Advertisement

Implementation Issue of “Eco-city” Projects in Turkiye: An Assessment of Problems Encountered

  • Zeynep Özdemir
  • Sezen Aslan
  • Hülagü Kaplan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

Eco-cities are desired as healthy human settlements in which self-sufficient, targeted to the deterioration of the balance between natural ecosystems and built environment. In the literature; the pre-conditions which is vary in aspects of environmental, social, economic, spatial and legal characteristics as eco-cities are defined. At present, many countries, including Turkey, have been attempting to establish eco-city projects succeed in different levels. In this process, Many issues are encountered as problematic factors. These factors can be categorized primarily as legal, administrative and project related procedures and process issues. The role of ‘actors’ and actor relations, economic and socio-cultural structures take part in this outlook at different levels. The purpose of this study is to examine the examples of eco-city projects. All such project attempts have varying problems about putting the theory into practice, determine the most effective tools and procedure. As the method of this study, the process of these eco-city projects have been examined with this factors. The methodology includes surveying such as contacting to concerned institutions to identify related problems. In addition; categorically chosen examples of eco-cities around the world have been studied for comparision. The same parameters and methodology have been followed in this comparative study. The comparative outlook helped to grasp the problematic ingredients of the process which determined in the projects’ success or failure, through this, whether the parameters in the projects have common characteristics or not, is investigated. Consequently; critical assessment through the findings, and suggestions to increase the success rate in the implementation of the eco-city projects.

Keywords

Ecological planning and sustainability Eco-city projects Comparative study 

References

  1. 1.
    Konyalıoğlu H (2015) Kent Planlama ve Ekoloji İlişkisi. http://planci.net/kent-planlama-ve-ekoloji-iliskisi/
  2. 2.
    Wong TC, Yuen B (2011) Eco-city planning policies, practice and design. Springer, Berlin, ISBN 978-94-007-0382-7Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan H, Aslan S, Özdemir Z (2015) Ecological planning study towards eco-urbanization project: Cide (Turkey) case study, 2nd international sustainable buildings symposium (ISBS-2015) Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Bank (2009) Sino-Singapore Tianjin eco-city: a case study of an emerging eco-city in China. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/776301468029076278/pdf/590120WP0P114811REPORT0FINAL1EN1WEB.pdf
  5. 5.
    Caprotti F (2014) Critical research on eco-cities? a walk through the Sino-Singapore Tianjin eco-city, China. Cities 36:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Low P, Ying S, Liu J, Wu P (2009) Sustainable facilities: institutional compliance and the Sino-Singapore Tianjin eco-city project. Facilities 27(9/10):368–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghiglione S, Larbi M (2015) Eco-cities in China: ecological urban reality or political nightmare? J Manag Sustain 5(1):101–114Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spath P, Rohracher H (2011) The ‘eco-cities’ Freiburg and Graz the social dynamics of pioneering urban energy and climate governance. In: Bulkeley H, Broto VC, Hodson M, Marvin S (eds) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mössner S (2016) Sustainable urban development as consensual practice: post-politics in Freiburg, Germany. Reg Stud 50(6):971–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Villacampa A, Hedayati N (2013) Tale of two cities: urban planning for the 21st century eco-metropolis. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 173Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Island Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mıller GT, Spoolman SE Jr (2011) Living in environment concepts, connections and solutions, Sixteenth editionGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Copenhagen Solution For Sustainable Cities (2012) City of copenhagen. http://www.arup.com/publications/copenhagen_solutions_for_sustainable_cities
  16. 16.
    Lundqvist M (2007) Sustainable cities in theory and practice, a comparative study of Curitiba and PortlandGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suzuki H, Dastur A, Moffatt S, Yabıki N, Maruyama F (2010) Eco2 cities ecological cities as economic cities World Bank, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Eskişehir Eko kent Projesi, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı ve İstanbul Tenik Üniversitesi iş birliği ile https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvkv32Np-iQ
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Güleç MS (2014) Gaziantep Ekolojik Kent, Yapı’da Ekoloji Şeffaflık Sürdürülebilirliğin Neresinde? Yapı dergisi, Nisan eki, pp 26–30Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaziantep Metropolitan Municipality (2013) Kilis Highway Gaziantep eco city project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtn2ePMFBCs 10.01.2016
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Stancheva E (2008) Urban sustainability: eco-cities, lecture notes http://econhist.userweb.mwn.de/geography/ES%20Eco-cities.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture, Department of City and Regional PlanningIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Architecture, Department of City and Regional PlanningGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations