Optimum Building Envelope Solution Strategies Based on the Solar Data in Performative Architecture

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

The number of the people who are aware of the energy issue is increasing since the fossil fuel reserves of the earth are coming to an end, and this fossil fuel consumption threatens the natural balance of the earth and human health. Considering the fact that the majority of the energy is consumed for constructing buildings and in these buildings after the construction, it is important to take energy-based decisions regarding the designs during the planning process. This study aims to present the optimum building envelope solution strategies by using the solar parameters, which are the most effective environmental factors in Turkey, with up-to-date computer programs making the digital designing process possible in performative architecture. Various samples were analyzed to examine the roles of performative architecture in pre and post-design process, and the relationship between the building envelope and energy was determined. In addition, the importance of using computers during the disregarded design process was emphasized, and awareness was raised in this issue.

Keywords

Performative architecture Parametric design Solar energy Building envelope 

References

  1. 1.
    AIA (2013) “Architecture 2030”, Commitment progress reportGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Güner D (2012) Performans ve Edimsellik Olarak Mimarlık. Ege University, Architecture, pp 24–25Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ofluoğlu S (2015) Bım Ve Performatif (Performansa Dayalı) Mimari Tasarım. Autodesk Yapı Tasarımı Atölyesi 5, İstanbul, pp 10–17 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Runddy R, Mohamed R (2014) Critical analysis of key determinants and barriers to digital innovation adoption among architectural organizations. Front Architectural Res 3(4):431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Pak B (2003) Dijital Ortam Mimari Tasarım Ara Kesitinde Bir Tasarım Modeli. ITU, Science, Master’s thesis, pp 21–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    William S, Aswin I, Heru W, P (2014) Parametric approach as a tool for decision-making in planning and design process. case study: office tower in Kebayoran Lama. 5th Arte Polis international conference and workshop—“reflections on creativity: public engagement and the making of place”, Arte-Polis 5, Bandung, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ofluoğlu S (2014) Bina Yaşam Döngüsünde BİM Uygulamaları. Mimar Sinan University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Department of Informatics, İstanbul, pp 26–27Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    IAAC, Guerrero M (2011) Fab lab houses, a new a for buildings new. Institute for advanced architecture of Catalonia, Barcelona, pp 13–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Necmettin Erbakan UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations