Advertisement

Evaluation of Sustainable Education Buildings on Samples

  • Hatice Derya Arslan
  • Esin Gülseker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

Environmental problems appear due to rapid population growth, uncontrolled urbanization, rapid exhaustion of natural sources, global warming and climate changes. With an aim to find solutions to these problems and to ensure that next generations can live on this planet, the concepts of sustainable architecture and sustainable buildings gained importance. Sustainable architecture is a contemporary and interdisciplinary approach to architecture that works in compliance with environmental systems. It builds on using energy and scanty sources consciously and economically. Sustainable construction design requires the integration of ecologic, economic and socio-cultural sustainability components into the design procedure in a balanced manner. Educational buildings that serve next generations are crucial in the context of sustainable design with their contributions to social awareness and the economy in the country. In this respect, first basic criteria that constitute the sustainability in education structure design, and samples of “sustainable education buildings” chosen from different climate regions around the world have been evaluated according to the defined criteria in the present study. The evaluations have indicated that parameters such as “environmental factors, climate features, land choice, material and construction technology used” are effective in sustainable education buildings designs. The results also underline the need for different designs in the light of the data gathered.

Keywords

Sustainability Education buildings Sustainable design criteria 

References

  1. 1.
    Muscoe M (1995) A sustainable community profile. Places J 9(3)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilman R (1992) Sustainability By Robert Gilman from the 1992 UIA/AIA Call for sustainable community solutionsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Round Table on the Environment and The Economy, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atalık G, Baycan T (1995) Planning and designing ecological approach, symposium book. MSÜ Faculty of Architecture, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davey P (2001) Scaling the city (Offices, City of London, Richard-Rogers-Partnership, architect). Archit Rev 209(1248):50–55Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kremers J (1995) Defining sustainable architecture. Electron J Archit 4(3) (Online)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shaviv E (1998) The integration of passive cooling, heating and daylighting in the design of an intelligent energy conscious building design. In: EuroSun98—proceedings of the second ISES-Europe solar congress, Portoroz, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J (1998) Qualities, use, and examples of sustainable building materials. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tuglu HU (2005) Sustainable buildings and materials with respect of ecology. Msc thesis, MSÜ, Institute of Sciences, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yudelson J (2007) Green building A to Z, understanding the language of green building. New Society Publishers, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prakash N, Fielding R (2007) The language of school design. Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools, DesignshareGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy C, Thorne A (2010) Health and productivity benefits of sustainable schools: a review. Brepress, WatfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Davis JM (2010) What is early childhood education for sustainability. In: Davis JM (ed) Young children and the environment, early education for sustainability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 21–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering-ArchitectureNecmettin Erbakan UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations