Advertisement

Incorporating Cultural and Moral Values into ELT Materials in the Context of Southeast Asia (SEA)

  • Handoyo Puji WidodoEmail author
  • Marianne Rachel Perfecto
  • Le Van Canh
  • Adcharawan Buripakdi
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 9)

Abstract

This chapter provides the rationale behind the integration of values into English language teaching (ELT) materials. It moves on to succinctly describe the sociolinguistic landscape of Southeast Asia (SEA) in order to help the reader understand the sociolinguistic context of the region. The chapter also outlines what each chapter presents. It concludes by pinpointing a pressing need for conducting a myriad of studies on the incorporation of moral and cultural values into ELT materials in which the contexts of studies should go beyond SEA.

Keywords

Critical language perspectives ELT materials Southeast Asia (SEA) Values 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2013). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alcoberes, P. J. N. (2016). The author-initiated discourses in the selected English textbooks in Southeast Asia: A World Englishes paradigm. Asian Englishes, 18, 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansaldo, U. (2009). Contact languages: Ecology and evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canagarajah, S. (2005). Critical pedagogy in L2 learning and teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 931–949). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Christian-Smith, L. K. (1991). Texts and high-tech: Computer, gender and book publishing. In W. M. Apple & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbooks (pp. 46–70). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  8. Goddard, C. (2005). Languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  10. Jayasuriya, S. K. (1997). Asian values as reactionary modernization. NIASnytt, Nordic Newsletter of Asian Studies, 4, 19–27.Google Scholar
  11. Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English language teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, B., Juhász, A., Marken, J., & Ruiz, B. R. (1998). Research in the teaching of English, 32, 161–181.Google Scholar
  13. King, V. T. (2008). The sociology of Southeast Asia: Transformations in a developing region. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick, A. (2014). World Englishes, 33, 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marlina, R., & Giri, R. (Eds.). (2014). The pedagogy of English as an international language: Perspectives from scholars, teachers, and students. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Matsuda, A. (2002). Representation of users and uses of English in beginning Japanese EFL textbooks. JALT Journal, 24, 182–200.Google Scholar
  18. McKay, S. (2011). English as an international lingua Franca pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 122–139). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System, 18, 303–314.Google Scholar
  20. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Renandya, W. A., & Widodo, H. P. (Eds.). (2016). English language teaching today: Linking theory and practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Robertson, C. J., Ralston, D. A., & Crittenden, W. F. (2012). The relationship between cultural values and moral philosophy: A generational subculture theory approach. AMS Rev, 2, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rüland, J. (2016). Why (most) Indonesian businesses fear the ASEAN economic community: Struggling with Southeast Asia’s regional corporatism. Third World Quarterly, 37, 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237–246.Google Scholar
  25. Siddique, S. (2008). Southeast Asia: The diversity dilemma. Madison: Select Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Tan, C. (2016). The present: An overview of teaching Chinese language in Singapore. In K. Soh (Ed.), Teaching Chinese language in Singapore: Retrospect and challenges (pp. 11–26). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White, P. (2002). The language of attitude, arguability and interpersonal positioning. From The Appraisal Homepage. Web site: http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Handoyo Puji Widodo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marianne Rachel Perfecto
    • 2
  • Le Van Canh
    • 3
  • Adcharawan Buripakdi
    • 4
  1. 1.English Language CenterShantou UniversityShantouChina
  2. 2.Department of EnglishAteneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines
  3. 3.Center for Foreign Language Education ResearchVietnam National UniversityHanoiVietnam
  4. 4.School of Foreign LanguagesSuraneree University of TechnologyMuangThailand

Personalised recommendations