Skip to main content

Theory of Generalised Heaps and Generalised Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wagner’s Theory of Generalised Heaps

Abstract

The purpose of this long paper was to develop the theories of generalised heaps and generalised groups in their mutual connections. To this end, Wagner began by introducing the new notion of a semiheap: a system with a ternary operation satisfying certain conditions. He explored some of the basic properties of semiheaps, as well as setting out elements of the theory of binary relations, the use of which was central to his approach. He next moved to the consideration of semigroups with involution, which turn out to have a natural connection with semiheaps, namely that any semiheap may be embedded in such a semigroup. Wagner then restricted his attention to a specific class of semigroups with involution: generalised groups (a.k.a. inverse semigroups), and the class of semiheaps with which they are closely associated: generalised heaps. He established elementary theories for these objects, and showed, for example, that any generalised heap may be embedded in a generalised group. These theories were then further expanded via the exploration of certain special binary relations in generalised heaps and generalised groups: the compatibility relation and the canonical order relation. The final section of the paper applies the previously developed notions to the context of binary relations and partial mappings and transformations: semiheaps and generalised heaps have a natural interpretation as abstractions of systems of binary relations or partial mappings between different sets, whilst semigroups and generalised groups apply in the case of partial transformations of a single set. It is proved that every generalised heap admits a representation by means of partial mappings, whilst every generalised group admits a representation via partial transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the theory of binary relations, we use the notation of Bourbaki [3]: \(\mathop{\rho }\limits^{-1}\) denotes the inverse of a binary relation ρ, and σρ denotes the product of binary relations ρ and σ.

  2. 2.

    For the case of commutative groups, it was considered earlier by Prüfer [10].

  3. 3.

    Following Bourbaki [3], we use the term order relation in a given set to mean a reflexive, anti-symmetric and transitive binary relation between its elements, i.e., that which other authors (see, for example, [2]) call a partial order relation.

  4. 4.

    For the definition of the union of sets, see [3].

  5. 5.

    Our use of our notation from mathematical logic is inessentially distinct from that of Lorenzen [15]. The advantage of the notation of Lorenzen over that of other authors is that, on the one hand, it best expresses the principle of duality, and, on the other, it accords with the corresponding notation in set theory. The similarity of the notation for the universal quantifier and conjunction, and of that for the existential quantifier and disjunction, is justified from the logical point of view by the fact that for the case of a finite domain [[550]] of variation of a variable, the universal quantifier is expressed by means of conjunction, and the existential quantifier by disjunction. Furthermore, this corresponds to the notation by similar signs of the intersection of two subsets or of an arbitrary set of subsets, and of the union of two subsets or of an arbitrary set of subsets.

  6. 6.

    In contrast to Bourbaki [3], we will systematically employ the notion of multivalued functions in connection with the theory of binary relations.

  7. 7.

    By \(\mathop{\rho }\limits^{n}\) we denote the n-th power of the binary relation ρ:

    $$\displaystyle{\mathop{\rho }\limits^{n} =\mathop{\underbrace{ \rho \circ \cdots \circ \rho }}\limits _{n}.}$$
  8. 8.

    This theorem is a generalisation of one proved by Lyapin [8] for semigroups.

  9. 9.

    The empty subset of a semigroup may also be considered a subsemigroup.

  10. 10.

    It is clear that the inverted semiheap of a generalised heap is a generalised heap.

  11. 11.

    In the general case, if we have an arbitrary binary relation ρK × L, we can define a similar function in \(\mathfrak{P}(K)\), taking values in \(\mathfrak{P}(L)\), by means of the formula

    $$\displaystyle{\rho (\mathfrak{k}) =\bigcap _{k\in \mathfrak{k}}\rho \langle k\rangle.}$$

    This function represents another form of the extension of the function defined by ρ to the set of subsets, which, in contrast to the union extension (8.1.26), is naturally called the intersection extension (see [12]).

  12. 12.

    This theorem has been proved by Rees (see [11]) for the case of a generalised group of one-to-one partial transformations.

  13. 13.

    Using the evident proposition that a generalised group considered as a generalised heap is a heap if and only if it is a group.

  14. 14.

    By \(\overbrace{\varphi ^{-1}}^{-1}\), we mean the inverse binary relation for φ−1.

  15. 15.

    From the definition (8.1.7) of lateral commutativity of a semiheap, it is clear that lateral commutativity is a necessary and sufficient condition for the identity transformation to be an anti-automorphism.

References

  1. Baer, R.: Zur Einführung des Scharbegriffs. J. Reine Angew. Math. 163, 199–207 (1929)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory. American Mathematical Society, New York (1948); Russian translation: IL, Moscow (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourbaki, N.: Théorie des Ensembles. Hermann, Paris (1939)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourbaki, Algèbre, I. Structures Algèbriques. Hermann, Paris (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt, H.: Über eine Verallgemeinerung des Gruppenbegriffs. Math. Ann. 96, 360–365 (1926)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Certaine, J.: The ternary operation (abc) = ab −1 c of a group. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 49(12), 869–877 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Croisot, R.: Une interprétation des relations d’équivalences dans un ensemble. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 226, 616–617 (1948)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyapin, E.S.: Normal complexes of associative systems. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 14, 179–192 (1950) (in Russian)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Mostowski, A.: Logika matematyczna: kurs uniwersytecki. Monografie matematyczne, vol. 18. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa-Wrocław (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prüfer, H.: Theorie der Abelschen Gruppen. I. Grundeigenschaften. Math. Z. 20, 165–187 (1924)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees, D.: On the group of a set of partial transformations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22, 281–284 (1948)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Riguet, J.: Relations binaires, fermetures, correspondances de Galois. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 76, 114–155 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sushkevich, A.K.: Theory of Generalised Groups. DNTVU, Kharkov-Kiev (1937) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner, V.V.: A ternary algebraic operation in the theory of coordinate structures. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 81(6), 981–984 (1951) (in Russian) [see Chapter 5]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenzen, P.: Die Widerspruchsfreiheit der klassischen analysis. Math. Z. 51, 1–24 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hollings, C.D., Lawson, M.V. (2017). Theory of Generalised Heaps and Generalised Groups. In: Wagner’s Theory of Generalised Heaps. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63621-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics