Skip to main content

Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions from Solid Waste Management: Prognosis of Related Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nexus: Energy, Environment and Climate Change

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

The implementation of cleaner waste treatment technologies in developing countries is accompanied by myriads of limitations and obstacles. This study reports that greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions that would not have happened with business-as-usual scenarios are achievable in the waste management system under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The grounds for CDM failures and successes were reviewed by reflecting on the past and current episodes in developing countries. It was found that economic development was directly proportional to increase in waste generation rate and influenced waste composition. The need to decouple waste production from Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and linking the prevalence of more low-carbon emissions waste treatment options were found essential to ensure sustainable development and mitigate climate change. Based on the present evaluation, Brazil and Thailand have had the largest number of CDM projects and mostly small-scale projects with the highest maximum emission reductions in Brazil (751, 148 Mt CO2e) followed by Vietnam (158, 727 Mt CO2e) and India (158, 077 Mt CO2e). It was found that small-scale projects were more feasible as technology transfer and financial status were hindering the implementation of large-scale CDM projects. Moreover, emissions trading through CDM were accompanied by technical obstructions in terms of carbon leakage, permit allowances and unfair carbon price with irregular international policies and regulations to control GHGs. This study highlights the potential of a carbon trading scheme through CDM waste management projects designed to aid highly polluting developed countries achieve their target baselines for carbon emissions. The increasing GHG emissions in developing and least developed countries could be tackled at the early stages of economic growth through financial and technological assistance from industrialized countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/projsearch.html. Last Updated 2015.

  2. 2.

    United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available from https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Rulings/index.html. Last updated 2015.

References

  • Alam, M. J. (2016). Critical evaluation of impact on economic growth of India due to the environmental degradation. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(4), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astrup, T., Moller, J., & Fruergaard, T. (2009). Incineration and co-combustion of waste accounting of GHG and global warming contributions. Waste Management and Research, 27, 789–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. R., Issaias, I., & Stentiford, E. I. (2008). Carbon-making the right choice for waste management in developing countries. Waste Management, 28, 690–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, C., & Söderholm, P. (1997). An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environmental and Resources Economics, 26(2), 429–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, J., Pipatti, R., Hashimoto, S., Diaz, C., Mareckova, K., Diaz, L., et al. (2008). Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: Conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Management and Research, 26(1), 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldrin, A., Andersen, J. K., Christensen, T. H., & Favoino, E. (2009). Composting and compost utilization: Accounting for GHG and global warming contributions. Waste Management, 28, 8000–8012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, M., Arens, C., Sterk, W., & Helmreich, H. W. (2011). Integrating Africa’s least developed countries into global carbon market: Analysing CDM implementation barriers. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environmental and Energy. Available from http://www.jiko-bmu.de/english/service/host_country_information/doc/1096.php. Accessed May 23, 2013.

  • Christensen, T. H., Gentil, E., Boldrin, A., Larsen, A. W., Weidema, D. C., & Hauschild, M. (2009). C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management system. Waste Management and Research, 27, 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, S. J. (2009). A dangerous obsession: The evidence against carbon trading and for real solutions to avoid a climate crunch. Research report. Available from www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dangerous_obsession.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.

  • Clo, S. (2008). The effectiveness of the EU emissions trading scheme. Climate Policy, 9(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colling, A. V., Oliveira, L. B., Reis, M. M., da Cruz, N. T., & Hunt, J. D. (2016). Brazilian recycling potential: Energy consumption and Green House Gases reduction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couth, R., & Trois, C. (2011a). Waste management activities and carbon emissions in Africa. Waste Management, 31, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couth, R., & Trois, C. (2011b). Waste management activities and carbon emissions in Africa. Waste Management, 31, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couth, R., & Trois, C. (2012). Sustainable waste management in Africa through CDM projects. Waste Management, 32, 2115–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormady, N. C., & Englander, G. (2016). Carbon allowances and the demand for offsets: A comprehensive assessment of imperfect substitutes. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1), 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Hayama: Waste Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Available from http://www.ipccnggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/0_overview/v0_0_cover.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2013.

  • Ellerman, A. D., & Joskow, P. (2008). The European Union’s emissions trading system in perspective. Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Available from http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/EU-ETS-In-Perspective-Report.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2013.

  • Evans, D. A., & Burtraw, D. (2009). Tradable rights to emit air pollution. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazeli, A., Bakhtvar, F., Jahanshaloo, L., Sidik, N. A. C., & Bayat, A. E. (2016). Malaysia’s stand on municipal solid waste conversion to energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1007–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. M. (2015). Emissions from tropical hydropower and the IPCC. Environmental Science Policy, 50, 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenhann, J. (2010). CDM pipeline overview. United Nations Environment Program Risoe Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development (URC). Available from http://cdmpipeline.org/. Accessed August 9, 2013.

  • Friedrich, E., & Trois, C. (2016). Current and future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the management of municipal solid waste in the eThekwini Municipality–South Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 4071–4083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-K. M., Swilling, M., Weizsäcker, E. U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., et al. (2013). http://uncsd.iisd.org/news/unep-releases-report-on-decoupling-resource-use-and-economic-growth/. Accessed July 23, 2013.

  • Galik, G. S., Murray, B. C., Mitchell, S., & Cottle, P. (2016). Alternative approaches for addressing non-permanence in carbon projects: An application to afforestation and reforestation under the Clean Development Mechanism. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentil, E., Christensen, T. H., & Aoustin, E. (2009). GHG accounting and waste management. Waste Management and Research, 27, 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillenwater, M. (2008). Forgotten carbon: Indirect CO2 in greenhouse gas mission inventories. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(3), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl, A., & Mauschitz, G. (2008). Role of waste management with regard to climate protection: A case study. Waste Management and Research, 26(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, C. (2009). International carbon finance and the Clean Development Mechanism. In D. Helm & C. Hepburn (Eds.), The economics and politics of climate change (pp. 409–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoa, N.T., & Matsuoka, Y. (2017). The analysis of greenhouse gas emissions/reductions in waste sector in Vietnam. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(3), 427–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodes, G., & Kamel, S. (2007). Equal exchange: Determining a fair price for carbon. UNEP RISOE Centre, Capacity Development for CDM (CD4CDM) Project. Available from http://www.unep.org/pdf/dtie/FairPriceCarbon.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.

  • Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P., (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. Urban Development Series Knowledge Papers, 15, 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, B., Mauerhofer, V., & Geng, Y. (2016). Analysis of existing building energy saving policies in Japan and China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(2), 1510–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC. Available from www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/support/Primer_2006GLs.pdf .‎ Accessed January 28, 2013.

  • Johnstone, N., & Labonne, J. (2004). Generation of household solid waste in OECD countries: An empirical analysis using macroeconomic data. Land Economics, 80(4), 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamran, A., Chaudhry, M. N., & Batool, S. A. (2015). Effects of socio-economic status and seasonal variation on municipal solid waste composition: A baseline study for future planning and development. Environmental Sciences Europe, 27(1), 16. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-015-0050-9. Accessed March 10, 2016.

  • Kawai, K., & Tasaki, T. (2016). Revisiting estimates of municipal solid waste generation per capita and their reliability. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 18(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, M., Kartha, S., Ruth, M., & Bernow, S. (1999). Evaluation of benchmarking as an approach for establishing Clean Development Mechanism baselines. Available from http://sei-us.org/Publications_PDF/SEI-EvaluationBenchmarkingCleanDev-99.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2013.

  • Lederer, M. (2010). Evaluating carbon governance: The Clean Development Mechanism from an emerging economy perspective. Journal of Energy Markets, 3(2), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema, A., & Lema, R. (2016). Low-carbon innovation and technology transfer in latecomer countries: Insights from solar PV in the clean development mechanism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B., & Boileau, P. (1999). Methods for assessment of inventory data quality: Issues for an IPCC expert meeting. Environmental Science and Policy, 2(3), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. L., Hwee Lee, L., & Wu, T. Y. (2016). Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: Recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E., Jiang, K., Hu, X., Zuo, J., Li, M., & Ju, H. (2015). Climate change mitigation and adaptation: Technology and policy options. In Climate and environmental change in China: 1951–2012 (pp. 107–127). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, L. (2009). Regulatory challenges for financial and carbon markets. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 3(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, X. F., & Nair, J. (2009). The impact of land filling and composting on greenhouse gas emissions—A review. Bioresource Technology, 100(16), 3792–3798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, C. A., & Bowen, J. D. (2012). The Clean Development Mechanism in the solid waste management sector: Sustainable for whom? Ecological Economics, 82, 123–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez de Alegría, I., Basañez, A., Díaz de Basurtoa, A., & Fernández-Sainz, A. (2016). Spain׳s fulfillment of its Kyoto commitments and its fundamental greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 858–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzanti, M. (2008). Is waste generation de-linking from economic growth? Empirical evidence for Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 15, 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: Evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohareb, E. A., Maclean, H. L., & Kennedy, C. A. (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions from waste management—assessment of quantification methods. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 61(5), 480–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monni, S., Pipatti, R., Lehtilla, A., Savolainen, I., & Syri, S. (2006). Global climate change scenarios for solid waste management Espoo 2006. VTT Publications 603. Available from www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2006/P603.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2013.

  • Monni, S., Syri, S., & Savolainen, I. (2004). Uncertainties in the finnish greenhouse gas emission inventory. Environmental Science and Policy, 7(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, I., & Schmidt, J. H. (2016). Methane oxidation, biogenic carbon, and the IPCC’s emission metrics. Proposal for a consistent greenhouse-gas accounting. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(8), 1069–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhre, G., et al. (2013). Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In T. F. Stocker et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group 1st to the 5th assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 661–740). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2009). Varities of CDM governance: Some reflections. The Journal of Environment and Development, 18(4), 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, Y., & Michaelowa, A. (2010). Effectiveness of subsidies for the Clean Development Mechanism: Past experiences with capacity building in Africa and LDCs. Climate and Development, 2(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A., Grönkvist, S., Lind, M., & Yan, J. (2016). The elephant in the room—A comparative study of uncertainties in carbon offsets. Environmental Science and Policy, 56, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L., & Blodgett, J. (2008). Carbon leakage and trade: Issues and approaches. Congressional Research Service. Available from www.crs.gov. Accessed June 15, 2013.

  • Pasour, E. C. (1981). The free rider as a basis for government intervention. Journal of Libratarian Studies, 5(4), 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, U., & Münster, M. (2016). Current and future prospects for heat recovery from waste in European district heating systems: A literature and data review. Energy, 110, 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikon, K., & Gaska, K. (2010). Greenhouse gas emission mitigation relevant to changes in municipal solid waste management system. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 60(7), 782–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong, F., Lan, Y., Zeng, S., & Yu, H. (2012). Waste recovery CDM projects in China: Status, challenges and suggestions. Climate Policy, 12(1), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Holzer, A., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2008). Understanding the CDM’s contribution to technology transfer. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2930–2938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L., Kollmuss, A., & Lazarus, M. (2015). Addressing the risk of double counting emission reductions under the UNFCCC. Climatic Change, 131(4), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities—A review. Waste Management, 28, 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström, M., & Östblom, G. (2010). Decoupling waste generation from economic growth—A CGE analysis of the Swedish case. Ecological Economics, 69, 1545–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekanth, K. J., Sudarsan, N., & Jayaraj, S. (2012). Clean Development Mechanism as a solution to the present world energy problems and a new world over: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streimikiene, D., & Girdzijauskas, S. (2009). Assessment of post-Kyoto climate change mitigation regimes impact on sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S., Sawer, J., Bonam, R., & Valdivia, J. E. (2009). Building a better methane generation model: Validating models with methane recovery rates from 35 Canadian landfills. Waste Management, 29, 2085–2091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, G. A., Alam, K., & Gow, G. (2016). Estimating the major contributors to environmental impacts in Australia. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 37(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC PDD. (2010). Omdurman landfill municipal solid waste composting project. Available from http://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/LQK9O8I2XS6HB4V037TPYCGEMN5DZW/Project_Design_Document.pdf?t=aXZ8MTI5Njk3NTI2Ni4yNw==|zAptLt540aM-lvnQb0Ka0Vmzy3c=. Accessed August 9, 2013.

  • Viguier, L. L. (2004). A proposal to increase developing country participation in international climate policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 7(3), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villoria-Sáez, P., Tam, V. W., del Río Merino, M., Arrebola, C. V., & Wang, X. (2016). Effectiveness of greenhouse-gas emission trading schemes implementation: A review on legislations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, M. B., & Deumlin, D. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 9266–9271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Geng, S., Zhao, P., Du, H., He, Y., & Crittende, J. (2016). Cost–benefit analysis of GHG emission reduction in waste to energy projects of China under clean development mechanism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiloso, E. I., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., & Fang, K. (2016). Effect of biogenic carbon inventory on the life cycle assessment of bioenergy: Challenges to the neutrality assumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woon, K. S., Lo, I. M. C., Chiu, S. L. H., & Yan, D. Y. (2016). Environmental assessment of food waste valorization in producing biogas for various types of energy use based on LCA approach. Waste Management, 50, 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Fujiwara, T., Matsuoka, Y., & Wang, W. (2016). A systematic approach to projecting industrial solid waste generation by industrial sector in Shanghai. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 18(1), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste in Beijing: The rising trend and the mitigation effects by management improvements. Waste Management & Research, 34(4), 368–377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunjaya Leelah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leelah, S., Mudhoo, A. (2018). Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions from Solid Waste Management: Prognosis of Related Issues. In: Leal Filho, W., Surroop, D. (eds) The Nexus: Energy, Environment and Climate Change. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63612-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63612-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63611-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63612-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics