Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Third Sector’s Role in Managing Serious Offenders: Partners, Collaborators or Buffers?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Sex Offender Risk Management, Volume I

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society ((PSRCS))

Abstract

This chapter will focus on the role of third-sector organisations in the management of sex offenders in the community. The chapter will consider, given the changing landscape of offender management, if the criminal justice system and third-sector organisations are working together or at cross-purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘third sector’ is used in this chapter even though it is not widely used outside of UK policy-making circles; ‘voluntary sector’ remains much more common in colloquial discourse. However, we prefer ‘third sector’ because this category includes mutuals and social enterprises, which are now as likely as charities to comprise the stratum of service providers. Additionally, the term ‘voluntary sector’ suggests that services are provided at a low cost and largely by volunteers (that is, unpaid helpers). The reality is rather different, especially as the risk management of sensitive client groups usually raises the professional, performative and legal standards required of the service provider.

  2. 2.

    Specifically, in its announcement, the ministry clustered several different types of surplus-making social enterprises to underline the suggestion that the successful contractors were not purely commercial interests: ‘Half of the partnerships chosen as preferred bidders also include new “mutual” organisations set up by current probation staff to take over their own organisations. The list of preferred bidders includes 16 charities and voluntary organisations, four probation staff mutuals and seven private companies, all with different expertise to bring to rehabilitation’ (Ministry of Justice 2014).

Reference

  • Beech, A., & Fisher, D. (2004). Adult Male Sex Offenders. In H. Kemshall & G. McIvor (Eds.), Managing Sex Offender Risk. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C., & Williamson, S. (2000). Review of the Research Literature on Serious Violent and Sexual Offenders (Crime and Criminal Justice Research Findings No. 46). Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. S. (2011). Dilemmas of Institutionalisation of the Penal Voluntary Sector in England and Wales. Critical Social Policy, 31(1), 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. S. (2014). The Trajectory of Penal Markets in an Age of Austerity: The Case of England and Wales. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Punishment and Incarceration: A Global Perspective (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 19). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M., Maguire, M., Prince, K., & Williams, K. (2016). Voluntary Sector Adaptation and Resilience in the Mixed Economy of Criminal Justice, England and Wales: Emerging Themes from a Research Project. Paper Presented at the British Society of Criminology Annual Conference, Nottingham, 6–8 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2011). Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation: Action Plan. London: Department for Education. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180867/DFE-00246-2011.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evaluation Support Scotland. (2011). Why Involve the Third Sector in Reducing Re-Offending. http://www.evaluationsupportscotland.org.uk/media/uploads/tsrf/120629_why_involve_the_third_sector_in_reducing_reoffending.pdf

  • Gallagher, B. (2009). Child Sexual Abuse: Informed or in Fear? Criminal Justice Matters, 77(September), 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D. (2012). Revolution’: Marketisation, the Penal System and the Voluntary Sector. In A. Silvestri (Ed.), Critical Reflections: Social and Criminal Justice in the First Year of Coalition Government. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebenton, B., & Thomas, T. (1996). Tracking Sex Offenders. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2016). Transforming Rehabilitation: Early Implementation, 4th Report. Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A., & Corcoran, M. S. (Eds.). (2016). The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K. J., & Henley, A. J. (2015). Disparities in Public Protection Measures against Sexual Offending in England and Wales: An Example of Preventative Injustice? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15(5), 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2001). Risk Assessment and Management of Known Sexual and Violent Offenders: A Review of Current Issues (Police Research Series No. 140). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2003). Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2008). Understanding the Community Management of High Risk Offenders. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2012). The Sex Offender Public Disclosure Pilots in England and Scotland: Lessons for ‘Marketing Strategies’ and Risk Communication with the Public. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12(5), 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H., & Maguire, M. (2001). Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality: The Multi-agency Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders. Punishment and Society, 3(2), 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H., & Wood, J. (2007). Beyond Public Protection: An Examination of Community Protection and Public Health Approaches to High-risk Offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(3), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H., MacKensie, G., & Wood, J. (2004). Stop It Now! UK and Ireland: An Evaluation. Leicester: De Montfort University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1999). The Ultimate Neighbour from Hell? Stranger Danger and the Media Framing of Paedophiles. In R. Franklin (Ed.), Social Policy, the Media and Misrepresentation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, R. D. (1996). Relapse Prevention or Harm Reduction? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(3), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, R. D. (2000). Sexual Offending as a Public Health Problem: A North American Perspective. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Association. (2011). National Conversation on Child Sexual Exploitation: Summary Report of Response. London: Local Government Association. Available from: http://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=c732e93b-b0d7-477b-981c-e9432c201cff&groupId=10180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlinden, A. M. (2007). The Shaming of Sexual Offenders: Risk, Retribution and Reintegration. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, K. (2016). Circles of Support and Accountability (Project Report). Bristol: University of the West of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, J. (2009). Promoting Inclusive Partnership Working. In R. Carnwell & J. Buchanan (Eds.), Effective Practice in Health, Social Care and Criminal Justice: A Partnership Approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2009). MAPPA Guidance 2009. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2012). MAPPA Guidance 2012. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2014). Voluntary Sector at Forefront of New Fight against Reoffending. Press Release, 19 October. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mythen, G., Walklate, S., & Kemshall, H. (2012). Decentralising Risk: The Role of the Voluntary and Community Sector in the Management of Offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, M. (1999). Police, Probation and Protecting the Public. London: Blackstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, M. (2006). Public Protection and the Criminal Justice Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service. (2012). MAPPA Guidelines. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Probation Directorate (NPD). (2004). Sex Offender Strategy for the National Probation Service. London: NPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (2004). Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: The Glass House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, H., & Strannach, I. (2008). Don’t Touch! The Educational Story of Panic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2000). The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men or the Arrival of Postmodern Penality? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Accounts Committee, House of Commons. (2016). Oral Evidence: Transforming Rehabilitation. HC 848, 4 July. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, P. (Ed.). (2013). Editorial: Transforming Rehabilitation—Under the Microscope. British Journal of Community Justice, Special Edition, 11((2–3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (2005). Sex Crime: Sex Offending and Society (2nd ed.). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomczak, P. (2016). The Penal Voluntary Sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The Good Lives Model and Conceptual Issues in Offender Rehabilitation. Psychology Crime and Law, 10(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The Good Lives Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Clinical Implications. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12, 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, S. (2016). ‘Let’s Talk about CSE’: The Regulation and Control of Childhood Behaviour and Sexuality. Paper Presented to the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control, Braga, 1–3 September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Keele University, Keele, UK

    Mary S. Corcoran & Samantha K. Weston

Authors
  1. Mary S. Corcoran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samantha K. Weston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Criminology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom

    Kieran McCartan

  2. Community and Criminal Justice, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Hazel Kemshall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corcoran, M.S., Weston, S.K. (2017). The Third Sector’s Role in Managing Serious Offenders: Partners, Collaborators or Buffers?. In: McCartan, K., Kemshall, H. (eds) Contemporary Sex Offender Risk Management, Volume I. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63567-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63567-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63566-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63567-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation