Skip to main content

Automatically Difficulty Grading Method Based on Knowledge Tree

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10412))

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to propose a model, which can automatically grade difficulty for a question from “instruction system” question bank. The system mainly uses 4 attributes with 26 features based on principal component analysis, which are employed to be input of the Automatically Difficulty Grading Model (ADGM). A knowledge tree model and a machine learning algorithm are utilized as important parts for the classification module. The experimental dataset “instruction system” question bank is based on our built “Principles of Computer Organization” online education system, the accuracy result of difficulty classification could be 77.43% which is much higher than the accuracy of random guess 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data can be get from http://mobisys.cc/pages/resource.html.

References

  1. Woods, A.M.: Exploiting linguistic features for sentence completion. In: The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 438 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sahu, S.K., Anand, A.: Recurrent neural network models for disease name recognition using domain invariant features. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09371 (2016)

  3. Sapkota, U., Solorio, T., Gomez, M.M., Bethard, S.: Domain adaptation for authorship attribution: improved structural correspondence learning. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pp. 2226–2235 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, T.-H., Hsu, Y.-C., Chang, C.-W., Hsu, Y.-C., Chang, J.-I.: Kc99: a prediction system for chinese textual entailment relation using decision tree. In: NTCIR, Citeseer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gkatzia, D., Lemon, O., Rieser, V.: Natural language generation enhances human decision-making with uncertain information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03254 (2016)

  6. Benzschawel, E.: Identifying potential adverse drug events in tweets using bootstrapped lexicons. YEARACL 2016, p. 15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Varjokallio, M., Klakow, D.: Unsupervised morph segmentation and statistical language models for vocabulary expansion. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 175–180 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qian, P., Qiu, X., Huang, X.: A new psychometric-inspired evaluation metric for chinese word segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2185–2194 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feifei, Z., Chengqing, Z.: Research on recognition of fillers in spoken dialogs. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 3, 017 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta, P.: From extractive to abstractive summarization: a journey. ACL 2016, p. 100 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wan, X., Wang, T.: Automatic labeling of topic models using text summaries. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 2297–2305 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wei12, Z., Liu, Y., Li, Y.: Is this post persuasive? Ranking argumenta-tive comments in the online forum. In: The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 195 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Logacheva, V., Lukasik, M., Specia, L.: Metrics for evaluation of word-level machine translation quality estimation. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Boyd-Graber, J., Findlater, L., Seppi, K.: Alto: active learning with topic overviews for speeding label induction and document labeling. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 1158–1169 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazemian, S., Zhao, S., Penn, G.: Evaluating sentiment analysis in the context of securities trading. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 2094–2103 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, T.-H., Lee, C.-H., Chang, Y.-M.: Enhancing automatic chinese essay scoring system from figures-of-speech. In: PACLIC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jia, H.E., Lin, C.: Optimization of chinese word segmentation based on neural network. J. Chengdu Univ. Inf. Technol. 6, 008 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitra, A., Baral, C.: Learning to use formulas to solve simple arithmetic problems. ACL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Inferring logical forms from denotations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06900 (2016)

  20. Persing, I., Ng, V.: Modeling stance in student essays. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pp. 2174–2184. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yih, W.-T., Richardson, M., Meek, C., Chang, M.-W., Suh, J., Richardson, M., Meek, C., Yih, S.W.-T.: The value of semantic parse labeling for knowledge base question answering. In: Proceedings of ACL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jia, R., Liang, P.: Data recombination for neural semantic parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03622 (2016)

  23. Khani, F., Rinard, M., Liang, P.: Unanimous prediction for 100% precision with application to learning semantic mappings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06368 (2016)

  24. Yu, D., Ji, H.: Unsupervised person slot filling based on graph mining. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pp. 44–53 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moosavi, N.S., Strube, M.: Which coreference evaluation metric do you trust? A proposal for a link-based entity aware metric. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 632–642 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Master Weilai Liu for providing the help of the ADGM model. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and helpful suggestions. The work is supported by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China award (No. 20130031120028), Research Plan in Application Foundation and Advanced Technologies in Tianjin award (No. 14JCQNJC00700), Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Computer Architecture, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences award under Grant No. CARCH201604.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoli Gong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, J., Liu, C., Yang, H., Feng, F., Gong, X. (2017). Automatically Difficulty Grading Method Based on Knowledge Tree. In: Li, G., Ge, Y., Zhang, Z., Jin, Z., Blumenstein, M. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63557-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63558-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics