Skip to main content

Nucleolus-Based Compensation Payments for Automated Negotiations of Complex Contracts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Group Decision and Negotiation. A Socio-Technical Perspective (GDN 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 293))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 886 Accesses

Abstract

Automated negotiation mechanisms (ANMs) can be used to semi-automatically negotiate well-structured but complex contracts. Such negotiations among multiple negotiators, who are represented by software agents, can easily reach a deadlock because they block each others proposals. This of course leads to inferior results. Our aim is to improve the performance of ANMs. In this paper, we try to overcome deadlocks during automated single negotiation text by using compensation payments. Compensation payments are calculated by a mediator according to the Nucleolus method from cooperative game theory. It guarantees that a unique payment is calculated in any case. Furthermore, it lies in the Core, if the Core exists. The proposed ANM can be vulnerable against shading the desired compensation payments. However, our computational experiments suggest that the negotiation results are both superior and faster compared to an ANM without compensation payments. The dominance increases with an increasing number of negotiators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aumann, R.J., Maschler, M.: Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the talmud. J. Econ. Theory 36(2), 195–213 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buer, T., Haass, R.: Cooperative liner shipping network design by means of a combinatorial auction. Flex. Serv. Manuf. J. (2017). doi:10.1007/s10696-017-9284-8

  3. Buer, T., Homberger, J., Gehring, H.: A collaborative ant colony metaheuristic for distributed multi-level uncapacitated lot-sizing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(17), 5253–5270 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudek, G., Stadtler, H.: Negotiation-based collaborative planning in divergent two-tier supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(2), 465–484 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eslikizi, S., Ziebuhr, M., Kopfer, H., Buer, T.: Shapley-based side payments and simulated annealing for distributed lot-sizing. In: Dolgui, A., Sasiadek, J., Zaremba, M. (eds.) 15th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (INCOM 2015), vol. 48, pp. 1592–1597. IFAC-PapersOnLine. Elsevier (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Homberger, J.: Decentralized multi-level uncapacitated lot-sizing by automated negotiation. 4OR Q. J. Oper. Res. 8, 155–180 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Homberger, J., Gehring, H., Buer, T.: Integrating side payments into collaborative planning for the distributed multi-level unconstrained lot sizing problem. In: 48th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1068–1077. IEEE Computer Society Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacob, J., Buer, T.: Population-based negotiation of contract clauses and transportation request assignments. IFAC PapersOnLine 49(12), 1862–1867 (2016). 8th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control MIM 2016, Troyes, France, 28–30 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Sierra, C.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decis. Negot. 10(2), 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. 15(2), 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Negotiating complex contracts. Group Decis. Negot. 12(2), 111–125 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., Bar-Yam, Y.: The dynamics of collaborative design: insights from complex systems and negotiation research. Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl. 11(3), 201–209 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes, F., Wooldridge, M., Novais, A.Q.: Negotiation among autonomous computational agents: principles, analysis and challenges. Artif. Intell. Rev. 29(1), 1–44 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmeidler, D.: The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17(6), 1163–1170 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziebuhr, M., Buer, T., Kopfer, H.: Agent-negotiation of lot-sizing contracts by simulated annealing with part-way resets. In: Klusch, M., Thimm, M., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) MATES 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8076, pp. 166–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40776-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The junior research group on Computational Logistics is funded by the University of Bremen in line with the Excellence Initiative of German federal and state governments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Guckenbiehl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guckenbiehl, G., Buer, T. (2017). Nucleolus-Based Compensation Payments for Automated Negotiations of Complex Contracts. In: Schoop, M., Kilgour, D. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation. A Socio-Technical Perspective. GDN 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 293. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics