Advertisement

Pluriversal Readings of Emancipatory Engagements

Chapter
  • 406 Downloads
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This volume brings together pluriversal readings of emancipatory approaches to community and other reflexive engagements. In so doing, the book recognises the confluences between critical peace psychology and other critically derived psychologies. As an intersected collection of chapters on emancipatory engagements, the volume evokes what Pelias (2004) terms the “methodology of the heart”, that is, the authors—conscious of the epistemic pitfalls inherent to detached expert formulaic pronouncements—are present in their work as embodied activist writers and reflexive analysts. Through their respective probing voices, the authors of these chapters occupy the interdiscursive realm of meaning and experience that interrogates what it means to engage in emancipatory work and build compassionate critical connections, while accompanying the subaltern through moments of destabilising dominant discourses and inscribing generative spaces. All of the contributors, without exception, locate themselves within their respective texts; they are sensitive to the traps of the narcissistic researcher-writer and yet astutely aware of the significance of positioning themselves as engaged subjects, immersed in the messiness and complexities of community and other reflexive engagements.

References

  1. Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategies.Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2004). The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.),Participation. The new tyranny (pp. 1–15). London, England: Zed.Google Scholar
  3. Kothari, U. (2004). Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.),Participation. The new tyranny (pp. 139–152). London, England: Zed.Google Scholar
  4. Pelias, R. J. (2004).A methodology of the heart. Evoking academic and daily life. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Seedat, M. (2012). Community engagement as liberal performance, as critical intellectualism and as praxis.Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22(4), 489–498.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social and Health SciencesUniversity of South AfricaJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.South African Medical Research Council-University of South Africa ViolenceInjury and Peace Research UnitCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations