Advertisement

Birds from Urban Latin America, Where Economic Inequality and Urbanization Meet Biodiversity

  • Ian MacGregor-Fors
  • Juan F. Escobar-Ibáñez
Chapter

Abstract

Following a massive migration toward cities, more than half of the total human population is now urban. Given the unbalanced metabolism of urban systems, urbanization has been recognized to be a major ecological driver with worrisome consequences at different spatial and temporal scales. Such an environmental issue has drawn the attention of ecologists from across the globe since the late 1990s, when urban ecology consolidated as a discipline. Although urban ecology has developed importantly in the last three decades, our comprehension of the effects of urbanization on wildlife communities is heavily biased toward developed countries, most of which are located in temperate regions. Woefully, there is a dearth of knowledge from highly biodiverse areas with increasing urbanization rates and major urban agglomerations. Latin America is not an exception, with most of its population in rapidly growing urban centers. Given that the region concentrates important biodiverse areas in a scenario of considerable economic and social disparity, understanding the effects that urbanization has on wildlife species is of special concern. Even though ecological studies performed in urban Latin America started in the 1970s, urban ecology in the region is still in the process of consolidation, with birds being the most studied group. Several ecological patterns hold in urban Latin America when contrasted with those from other regions; yet, important differences have been identified, making evident the need to understand the response of wildlife species in the region. In this book, we gathered regional experts to set the state-of-the-art of bird studies in urban Latin America. Starting with an updated review, the book transits across topics such as urban bird species richness, composition, abundance, demography, population dynamics, behavior, threats, and conservation, as well as their relationships with ‘green’ and ‘gray’ infrastructures. After reviewing the specific topics with information from across the globe, each chapter contrasts the global findings with those from Latin America, identifying knowledge gaps and research needs to suggest future directions. The gathered information sets the foundation for the study of birds in urban Latin America, hopefully promoting the consolidation of the field in the region and encouraging future mechanistic studies that untangle the recorded patterns to have the required information to bridge the gap between evidence-based knowledge and practice in urban systems.

Keywords

Anthropocene Avian studies Ecological footprint Megadiverse cities Urban ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply thankful to Mark Goddard and Rafael Rueda Hernández for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved the clarity of this chapter, and Michelle García-Arroyo for her support in drawing Fig. 1.1. JFE-I acknowledges the scholarship and financial support provided by the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT 366146), as well as the Graduate School of the Instituto de Ecología, A.C. (INECOL).

References

  1. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E et al (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH et al (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20133330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa O, Tratalos J, Armsworth P et al (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 83:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazzaz FA (1990) The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:167–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkowitz AR, Nilon CH, Hollweg KS (eds) (2003) A new frontier for science and education. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The Anthropocene. IGBP Newsl 41:17–18Google Scholar
  10. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delgado-Velez CA, Correa-Hernandez JC (2013) Estudios ornitológicos urbanos en Colombia: Revisión de literatura. Ing Cienc 9:215–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eldredge N, Horenstein N (2014) Concrete jungle: New York City and our last best hope for a sustainable future. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151:19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonaroff LS (1974) Urbanization, birds and ecological change in northwestern Trinidad. Biol Conserv 6:258–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. González-Urrutia M (2009) Avifauna urbana en América Latina: Estudio de casos. Gestión Ambiental 17:55–68Google Scholar
  16. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE et al (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hedblom M, Murgui E (2017) Urban bird research in a global perspective. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Cham, pp 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB et al (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lepczyk CA, Flather CH, Radeloff VC et al (2008) Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance. Conserv Biol 22:405–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Z, He C, Zhou Y et al (2014) How much of the world's land has been urbanized, really? A hierarchical framework for avoiding confusion. Landsc Ecol 29:763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marzluff JM (2016) A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future. Ibis 159:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) (2001) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  23. Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM (2016) The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536:143–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonnell MJ (2011) The history of urban ecology: an ecologist's perspective. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T et al (eds) Urban ecology: patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell MJ, MacGregor-Fors I (2016) The ecological future of cities. Science 352:936–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Mittermeier CG (eds) (1997) Megadiversity: earth’s biologically wealthiest nations. CEMEX/Agrupación Sierra Madre, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  29. Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW et al (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moreno CE, Sánchez-Rojas G, Pineda E et al (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity evaluation: a review of terminology and recommendations for the use of target groups, bioindicators and surrogates. Int J Environ Health 1:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Navarro-Sigüenza AG, Rebón-Gallardo MF, Gordillo-Martínez A et al (2014) Biodiversidad de aves en México. Rev Mex Biodivers 85:476–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niemelä J (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers Conserv 8:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nilon CH, Warren PS, Wolf J (2011) Baltimore birdscape study: identifying habitat and land-cover variables for an urban bird-monitoring project. Urban Habitats 6Google Scholar
  34. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (2002) The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:199–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ONU-Habitat (2012) Estado de las ciudades de América Latina y el Caribe. Rumbo a una nueva transición urbana. Naciones Unidas, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  36. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2011a) Dusting-off the file: a review of knowledge on urban ornithology in Latin America. Landsc Urban Plan 101:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2011b) Spreading the word: the ecology of urban birds outside the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. Auk 128:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pauchard A, Barbosa O (2013) Regional assessment of Latin America: rapid urban development and social economic inequity threaten biodiversity hotspots. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 598–608Google Scholar
  39. Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Grove J (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM et al (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manag 92:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Childers DL et al (2016) Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst Health Sustain 2:e01229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pitelka FA (1942) High population of breeding birds within an artificial habitat. Condor 44:172–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P et al (1996) Manual de métodos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, CaliforniaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reyes S, Figueroa I (2010) Distribución, superficie y accesibilidad de las áreas verdes en Santiago de Chile. EURE 26:89–110Google Scholar
  45. Santandreu A, Gómez Perazzoli A, Dubbeling M (2002) Biodiversity, poverty and urban agriculture, in Latin America. Urban Agric Mag 6:9–11Google Scholar
  46. Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B et al (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One 6:e23777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Steffen WL, Sanderson A, Tyson PD et al (eds) (2005) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P et al (2011) The Antropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:842–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L et al (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev 2:81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW, Parker TA et al (eds) (1996) Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Evans KL et al (2007) Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob Chang Biol 13:1685–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S et al (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division ST/ESA/SER.A/352Google Scholar
  54. United Nations (2015a) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division ST/ESA/SER.A/366Google Scholar
  55. United Nations (2015b) World population 2015. Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Venter O, Sanderson EW, Magrach A et al (2016) Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat Commun 7:12558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J et al (1997) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waters C, Zalasiewicz J, Summerhayes C et al (2016) The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science 351:aad2622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wigginton NS, Fahrenkamp-Uppenbrink J, Wible B et al (2016) Cities are the future. Science 352:904–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Red de Ambiente y SustentabilidadInstituto de EcologíaXalapaMexico

Personalised recommendations