Abstract
Based on the rise (or return) of populist parties in Europe, theories of populism have re-entered political and academic debates. In particular, Ernesto Laclau’s works have gained renewed status as plausible explanations for why and how new parties form. However, an adoption of Laclau’s framework onto current events carries several implications, which will be the focus of this chapter. First, there is an increased tendency to use Laclau’s work as an instruction manual, rather than as merely a social theory. For instance, Podemos in Spain have openly announced the influence of Laclau on their political program, and emphasized the need for articulating a chain of equivalence to create a counter-hegemonic political force, “the people.” Second, the theory of hegemony as used by new populist parties in Europe reinforces the idea of political subjectivity as aligned with the national sovereign. A counter-discourse against the hegemonic practices of the European Union has been intertwined with an increased focus on national autonomy, which does not heavily discriminate against more reactionary nationalist currents. This chapter concludes by arguing that using Laclau’s theory as a roadmap could be adopted also by non-emancipatory projects, thus misappropriating Laclau’s proposed intentions, and once again making national sovereignty the phantasmatic political goal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For studies on the horizontal qualities of Indignados, see Perugorría and Tejerina (2013), Stobart (2014), Espinoza Pino (2013), Sampedro and Haro Barba (2011), Fominaya (2014), and Peña Lopez et al. (2014). For studies on the Occupy and the Global Justice Movements which agree with Hardt and Negri, see Maeckelbergh (2012), Juris (2011, 2008), Sitrin (2012), and Williams (2012).
References
Balfor, S. (2005). The politics of contemporary Spain. London: Routledge.
Bodin, J. (1992). On sovereignty: Four chapters from six books of the commonwealth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castañeda, E. (2012). The indignados of Spain: A precedent to occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 11(3–4), 309–319.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Charnock, G., Purcell, T., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2014). Limits to capital in Spain: Crisis and revolt in the European South. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Day, R. (2005). Gramsci is dead. London: Pluto Press.
De Saussure, F. (1983 [1916]). Course in general linguistics. London: G. Duckworth.
Democracia real ya! (2011). Manifesto. http://www.democraciarealya.es/manifiesto-comun/manifesto-english/. Accessed 12 June 2012.
El País. (2012). Rajoy Anuncia el Recorte de 10.000 millones en Educación y Sanidad Política, 9/4. http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2012/04/09/actualidad/1333985643_619652.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2013.
Errejón, Í. (2015). We the people El 15-M: ¿Un populismo indignado? ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(1), 124–156.
Errejón, Í., & Mouffe, C. (2015). Construir pueblo: Hegemonía y radicalización de la democracia. Barcelona: Icaria.
Errejón, I., Grande, R., Díez García, R., Ramos, M., & Prieto Serrano, D. (2015). Pateando el tablero: “El 15M como discurso contrahegemónico” cuatro años después. ENCRUCIJADAS. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 9, 1–35.
Espinoza, P. M. (2013). Politics of indignation: Radical democracy and class struggle beyond postmodernity. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society, 25(2), 228–241.
European Financial Stability Facility. (2013). Frequently asked questions about the EFSF. http://www.efsf.europa.eu/attachments/2015-03-19%20EFSF%20FAQ.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.
European Parliament. (2014). Results of the 2014 European elections. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/country-results-es-2014.html. Accessed 30 Apr 2015.
Eurostat. (2011). Labour market. Eurostat Yearbook 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5728777/KS-HA-11-001-EN.PDF. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.
Fominaya, C. (2014). Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/indignados as autonomous movement. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 142–163.
García-jiménez, L., Zamora-Medina, R., & Martínez-Fernández, R. (2014). The construction of symbolic power: Comparing offline and online media representations of occupy the street in Spain. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2540–2560.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. New York: Penguin Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York: Argo Navis Author Services.
Hobbes, T. (1968 [1651]). Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.
Iglesias, P. (2015). Understanding PODEMOS. New Left Review, 93, 7–22.
Jiménez, R., María, A., González-Fernández, M., & Jiménez Sánchez, M. (2015). Identifying with the nation: Spain’s left-wing citizens in an age of crisis. South European Society and Politics, 20(4), 487–508.
Juris, J. (2008). Performing politics: Image, embodiment, and affective solidarity during anti-corporate globalization protests. Ethnography, 9(1), 61–97.
Juris, J. (2011). A new way of doing politics? Global justice movements and the cultural logic of networking. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 38(1), 127–142.
Kioupkiolis, A. (2010). Radicalizing democracy. Constellations, 17(1), 137–154.
Kolb, R. (Ed.). (2011). Financial contagion the viral threat to the wealth of nations. Hoboken: Wiley.
Lacan, J. (1964). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (trans: Sheridan, A.). London: Routledge.
Lacan, J. (1993 [1955–6]). The seminar. Book III, The psychoses 1955–6 (trans: Grigg, R.). London: Routledge.
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2001). Can immanence explain social struggles? Diacritics, 31(4), 3–10.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2006). Why constructing a people is the main task of radical politics. Critical Inquiry, 32(4), 646–680.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001 [1985]). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture and Society, 24(3), 55–78.
Maeckelbergh, M. (2012). Horizontal democracy now: From alterglobalization to occupation. Interface, 4(1), 207–234.
Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marco, J. M. (2015). La patria es la gente o el nacionalismo, según Podemos. La Razón, 25/10. http://www.larazon.es/espana/la-patria-es-la-gente-o-el-nacionalismo-segun-podemos-EE11043896#.Ttt1whYwoUTj6N6. Accessed 25 Dec 2015.
Metroscopia. (2015). Intención de voto y valoración de los candidatos. El País, 30/11. http://elpais.com/elpais/2015/11/27/media/1448645320_615174.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
Michels, R. (1999 [1911]). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. London: Transaction.
Muñoz Lopera, J. M. (2012). Los Indignados del 15-M. Nuevas Formas de Resistencia Ciudadana. Boletín de Antropología Universidad de Antioquia, 26(43), 239–252.
Newman, S. (2007). Unstable universalities: Post-structuralism and radical politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Núñez, X. (2001). What is Spanish nationalism today? From legitimacy crisis to unfulfilled renovation (1975–2000). Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(5), 719–752.
Peña López, I., Congosto, M., & Aragón, P. (2014). Spanish indignados and the evolution of the 15M movement on twitter: Towards networked para-institutions. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(1–2), 189–216.
Perugorría, I., & Tejerina, B. (2013). Politics of the encounter: Cognition, emotions and networks in the Spanish 15M. Current Sociology, 61(4), 424–442.
Podemos. (2014). Programma para las Elecciones Europeas. http://podemos.info/programa/. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.
Podemos. (2015). El programa del cambio. http://podemos.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/prog_marco_12.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2015.
Prentoulis, M., & Thomassen, L. (2013). Political theory in the square: Protest, representation, and subjectification. Contemporary Political Theory, 12(3), 166–184.
Prentoulis, M., & Thomassen, L. (2014). Autonomy and hegemony in the squares: The 2011 protests in Greece and Spain. In A. Kiopkiolis & G. Katsembekis (Eds.), Radical democracy and collective movements today: The biopolitics of the multitude versus the hegemony of the people (pp. 213–234). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Romanos, E. (2013). Evictions, petitions and escraches: Contentious housing in austerity Spain. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest, 13(2), 296–302.
Sampedro, V. (2014). El Mayor Riesgo de Podemos es que Funcione de Arriba Abajo. La Marea, 31/12. http://www.lamarea.com/2014/12/31/victor-sampedro-el-mayor-riesgo-de-podemos-es-que-funcione-de-arriba-abajo/. Accessed 30 Apr 2015.
Sampedro, V., & Haro Barba, C. (2011). Activismo Político en Red: del Movimiento por la Vivienda Digna al 15M. Revista Teknokultura, 8(2), 167–185.
Sampedro, V., & Lobera, J. (2014). The Spanish 15-M movement: A consensual dissent? Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15(1–2), 61–80.
Sitrin, M. (2012). Horizontalism and the occupy movements. Dissent Magazine. http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/horizontalism-and-the-occupymovements. Accessed 27 Aug 2013.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2007). The Lacanian left: Psychoanalysis, theory, politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). Hegemony or post-hegemony? Discourse, representation and the revenge(s) of the real. In A. Kiopkiolis & G. Katsembekis (Eds.), Radical democracy and collective movements today: The biopolitics of the multitude versus the hegemony of the people (pp. 111–132). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Stobart, L. (2014). Whatever happened to the Indignados? 1: Radical struggle. Left Flank, 17/4. http://left-flank.org/2014/03/17/whatever-happened-indignados-part-1/. Accessed 6 Apr 2015.
Tønder, L. (2005). Inessential commonality: Immanence, transcendence, abundance. In L. Tønder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 203–218). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Wert, J. I. (2011). Descifrando la Indignación. El País, 29/6. http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2011/06/29/actualidad/1309370646_744082.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2012.
Williams, D. M. (2012). The anarchist DNA of occupy. Contexts, 11(2), 19–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eklundh, E. (2018). Populism, Hegemony, and the Phantasmatic Sovereign: The Ties Between Nationalism and Left-Wing Populism. In: García Agustín, Ó., Briziarelli, M. (eds) Podemos and the New Political Cycle. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63431-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63432-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)