Abstract
Logic is typically characterized as a (or the) theory of inference; but that characterization is a biased and restrictive one. Once we understand a logic, instead, as a theory of the logos—that is, of meaningful discourse: of what makes discourse the vehicle of meaning—we open up a field of possible ways of reasoning and arguing that do not reduce to inferences. It is within this field that the present book moves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the Merriam-Webster dictionary the first definition of “logic” (more about multiple definitions below) is “a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy “logic” is defined as “The general science of inference.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bencivenga, E. (2017). Logic: A Contested Term. In: Theories of the Logos. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63396-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63396-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63395-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63396-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)