Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Censorship in the Family: The Double-Edged Sword of Family Secrets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Censorship in Contexts of Conflict

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

This chapter diverges from the central thread of this volume, which is concerned predominantly with self-censorship within the context of national groups and large-scale societies. In this chapter, we address the issue of self-censorship, or secrecy, in small and intimate settings, namely, in the family context. We focus on both continuities and discontinuities between the phenomenon of self-censorship in the family and in broader social contexts. We argue that self-censorship hinges on a central dialectic: between social affiliation on the one hand and personal autonomy on the other. We examine both the costs and advantages of self-censorship in the family at the individual, relationship, and systemic levels of analysis. We argue that both concealing information and sharing it can be used as psychosocial strategies for connecting to others and belonging to a social unit, as well as for individuation, “breaking ranks,” and assertion of one’s self, values, and commitments. Self-censorship is therefore a multifaceted, complex notion, involving the integration of principles of fairness, communication, trust, and control. This central dialectic tension between privacy and openness, secrecy and disclosure, self-censorship and transparency may also be related to other dialectical tensions, such as freedom and responsibility (i.e., rights and duties), that manifest not only in families but also in broader societal structures. Democratic societies, in particular, are concerned with maintaining a balance between individual freedoms and mutually shared commitments.

A secret is a weapon and a friend (Irish proverb)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afifi, T., & Steuber, K. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): Factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 144–176. doi:10.1080/03637750902828412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afifi, W. A., & Caughlin, J. P. (2006). A close look at revealing secrets and some consequences that follow. Communication Research, 33(6), 467–488. doi:10.1177/0093650206293250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone – especially ourselves. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D., Eland, J., Kleber, R. J., Krell, R., Moore, Y., Sagi, A., … van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1998). Multigenerational perspectives on coping with the Holocaust experience: An attachment perspective for understanding the developmental sequelae of trauma across generations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(2), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2017). Self-censorship: The conceptual framework. In D. Bar-Tal, R. Nets-Zehngut, & K. Sharvit (Eds.), Self-censorship in different contexts: Theory and research (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2003). Family therapy: A systemic integration, vol. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, A. (2012). Rethinking closeness and distance in intimate relationships: Are they really two opposites? Journal of Family Issues, 33(3), 391–412. doi:10.1177/0192513X11415357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R., & Paul, M. (2008). Family secrets and family functioning: The case of donor assistance. Family Process, 47(4), 553–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, D. (2006). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 1–18. doi:10.1300/J145v09n04_01.

  • Brown-Smith, N. (1998). Family secrets. Journal of Family Issues, 19(1), 20–42. doi:10.1177/019251398019001003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Olson, C. D., & Buckmiller, N. (2007). Family boundary ambiguity: A 30-year review of theory, research, and measurement. Family Relations, 56(2), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crago, H. (1997). The ‘not to be opened letter’: Family secrets, hidden knowledge and violated prohibitions. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., Cumsille, P., Caldwell, L. L., & Dowdy, B. (2006). Predictors of adolescents’ disclosure to parents and perceived parental knowledge: Between- and within-person differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(4), 667–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldar-Avidan, D. (2011). On behalf of the children: Narratives and insights of children of divorce. Tel Aviv, Israel: Am Oved. [Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkenauer, C., Engels, R. C., & Meeus, W. (2002). Keeping secrets from parents: Advantages and disadvantages of secrecy in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijns, T., Finkenauer, C., & Keijse, L. (2013). Shared secrets versus secrets kept private are linked to better adolescent. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gingo, M. E. (2012). The coordination of social contextual features in children’s use of and reasoning about honesty and deception (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingo, M., Roded, A. D., & Turiel, E. (2017). Authority, Autonomy, and Deception: Evaluating the Legitimacy of Parental Authority and Adolescent Deceit. Journal of Research on Adolescence. DOI: 10.1111/jora.12319

  • Hawk, S. T., Hale, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A., & Meeus, W. (2008). Adolescents’ perceptions of privacy invasion in reaction to parental solicitation and control. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(4), 583–608. doi:10.1177/0272431608317611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpel, M. A. (1980). Family secrets. Family Process, 19(3), 295–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kav Venaki, S., Nadler, A., & Gershoni, H. (1985). Sharing the Holocaust experience: Communication behaviors and their consequences in families of ex-partisans and ex-prisoners of concentration camps. Family Process, 24(2), 273–280. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00273.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. F., & Van Horn, P. (2008). Psychotherapy with infants and young children: Repairing the effects of stress and trauma on early attachment. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1973). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. K., Tilton-Weaver, L. C., & Bosdet, L. (2005). Information management: Considering adolescents’ regulation of parental knowledge. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 633–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(5), 514–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Family therapy: Concepts and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52(1), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgad, Y. (2012). Family secrets: A psychoanalytic-semiotic analysis (unpublished doctoral proposal). Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, S. A., & Turiel, E. (2007). To lie or not to lie: To whom and under what circumstances. Child Development, 78(2), 609–621. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01017.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petronio, S. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 175–196. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach, A., & Shak’ed, A. (2013). Marriage and the family. In A. Rokach & A. Shak’ed (Eds.), Together and lonely: Loneliness in intimate relationships – Causes and coping. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, H. (2009, March 3). Don’t deny it: The lies we tell our kids. Retrieved from www.today.com; http://www.today.com/id/29495098/ns/today-parenting_and_family/t/dont-deny-it-lies-we-tell-our-kids/#.UdFd4HXMjHQ.

  • Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Development, 60(5), 1052–1067.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (2010). Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent–parent relationships. In J. G. Smetana (Ed.), Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds (pp. 216–248). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444390896.ch11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Metzger, A., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2006). Disclosure and secrecy in parent-adolescent relationships. Child Development, 77(1), 201–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B. (1987). “I have to talk to somebody”: A fever model of disclosure. In V. J. Derlega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research and therapy (pp. 257–277). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, B., DeVault, C., & Cohen, T. F. (2013). The meaning of marriage and the family. In The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society (vol. 10 ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E., & Perkins, S. A. (2004). Flexibilities of mind: Conflict and culture. Human Development, 47, 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E., Perkins, S. A., & Mensing, J. (2009). Honesty in marriage: When is deception justified? (unpublished manuscript). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Family secrets: Forms, functions and correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 113–135. doi:10.1177/0265407594111007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainryb, C., & Turiel, E. (1994). Dominance, subordination, and concepts of personal entitlements in cultural contexts. Child Developement, 65(6), 1701–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, H., Barber, J. P., Raz, A., Yam, I., Foltz, C., & Livne-Snir, S. (2002). Parental communication of Holocaust experiences and interpersonal patterns in offspring of Holocaust survivors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(4), 371–381. doi:10.1080/01650250143000346

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel

    Alona D. Roded

  2. The College for Academic Studies, Or Yehuda, Israel

    Amiram Raviv

  3. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Amiram Raviv

Authors
  1. Alona D. Roded
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amiram Raviv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alona D. Roded .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Daniel Bar-Tal

  2. International Summer Program in Conflict Resolution, Bar Ilan University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Rafi Nets-Zehngut

  3. Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Keren Sharvit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roded, A.D., Raviv, A. (2017). Self-Censorship in the Family: The Double-Edged Sword of Family Secrets. In: Bar-Tal, D., Nets-Zehngut, R., Sharvit, K. (eds) Self-Censorship in Contexts of Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63378-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation