Identifying the Main Factors of Workplace Flexibility Among Romanian Employees

  • Viorel Lefter
  • Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu
  • Ionut Casuneanu


Workplace flexibility gained increasingly more importance in the last decade, companies using it as a useful instrument to improve retention, to increase the overall level of work motivation and also to assure an adequate personal life to employees.

In this context, the paper aimed to identify the main flexibility factors among Romanian employees using as method of investigation, the principal component analysis based on a sample of 100 employees.

Analyzing the main forms of flexibility activities, the majority of the respondents consider teamwork and usage of information technology as primordial elements of flexibility.

The empirical results of the principal component analysis revealed that two main elements of flexibility are very important for Romanian employees-autonomy of work teams and working time flexibility.

Workplace flexibility is very important because employees will be more productive and more engaged in their work when there are able to balance the demands of work with other aspects of their lives.

The availability of a variety of flexible work arrangements can help employees also maximize work-family balance, which benefits both the employee and the employer.


Workplace flexibility Employee motivation Survey Romanian employees Flexibility factors 


  1. Aequus Partners. (2010). Workplace flexibility: Advice, training, research. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from
  2. Baltes, B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 496–513. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casey, J., & Chase, P. (2004). Creating a culture of flexibility: What it is, why it matters, how to make it work Chestnut Hill. Cambridge, MA: Boston College Center for Work and Family. Retrieved from Scholar
  4. Casuneanu, I. (2013). Îmbunătăţirea flexibilităţii forţei de muncă din întreprinderile româneşti folosind practicile în domeniu din unele ţări UE. Economie teoretică şi aplicată, XX(8(585)), 110–122.Google Scholar
  5. Coenen, M., & Kok, R. A. (2014). Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules. European Management Journal, 32(4), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung, H., & Tijdens, K. (2012). Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: Using company-level data across 21 countries.Google Scholar
  7. Field, A. (2009). Discovering SPSS using SPSS. London: SAGE publication Ltd; 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Fynes, N., & Storrie, A. (1998). Families and work in the twenty-first century: Employer benefit from flexible working. Department of Social and Family Affair.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffrey Hill, E., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., et al. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, K., & Jones, E. (2011). Flexible working practices in the UK: Gender and management perspectives. Journal of Women in Society, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
  11. Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Building and developing the organization (pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kossek, E., & Thompson, R. (2015). Workplace flexibility: Integrating employer and employee perspectives to close the research-practice implementation gap. In L. Eby & T. Allen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of work and family. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Kossek, E. E., & Thompson, R. J. (2016). Workplace flexibility: Integrating employer and employee perspectives to close the research–practice implementation gap. In The Oxford handbook of work and family, 255.Google Scholar
  14. Martínez-Sánchez, A., Pérez-Pérez, M., De-Luis-Carnicer, P., & Vela-Jiménez, M. J. (2007). Telework, human resource flexibility and firm performance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matos, K., & Galinsky, E. (2014). 2014 national study of employers. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  16. McNall, L. A., Masuda, A. D., & Nicklin, J. M. (2010). Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. The Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 61–81. doi: 10.1080/00223980903356073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Noonan, M. C., Estes, S. B., & Glass, J. L. (2007). Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor? Journal of Family Issues, 28(2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2008). Workplace flexibility and job satisfaction: Some evidence from Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 29(6), 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Matz-Costa, C. (2008). The multi-generational workforce: Workplace flexibility and engagement. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ***SPSS package version 22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viorel Lefter
    • 1
  • Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ionut Casuneanu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ManagementBucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Statistics and EconometricsBucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Department of Labour Market PoliciesSenior Researcher at National Research Institute for Labour and Social ProtectionBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Bucharest Academy of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations