Skip to main content

Resisting Forms: Prolegomena to an Aesthetics of Resistance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Street Art of Resistance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

John Dewey’s aesthetic theory frames the critical–aesthetic role of graffiti and street art as “resisting forms.” In their dispersion and scattering on multiple surfaces, they cannot be centrally controlled. They resist the recourse to force by established powers to maintain order. The aesthetic dimension, Dewey shows, is not restricted to works of art, concentration on which impedes our recognizing art’s role in other sectors of our experience. Such a way of thinking transcends the distinction between “high” and “low” art forms and their intrinsic connection to the stratification of social and political groups. The interruptive nature of art forms to challenge perceptual and conceptual habits is exemplified in graffiti’s and street art’s power to do this with great skill and expressive richness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have treated different aspects of Dewey’s aesthetics in a number of essays and books. The most pertinent ones for present purposes are included in the reference list at the end of this chapter. I have avoided extensive citation of parallel materials and focused on Dewey’s contribution to a discussion of the central themes of this book.

References

  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: H. Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1930). Qualitative thought. Symposium, 1, pp. 5–32. In Hickman and Alexander, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group, 2005. Page references are to this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1935). Peirce’s theory of quality. The Journal of Philosophy, 32(26), 701–708. In Hickman and Alexander, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (1987). Aesthetic rationality as social norm. Phänomenologische Forschungen, 20, 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (1994). Consciousness and the play of signs. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2002). Pragmatism and the forms of sense: Language, perception, technics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2009). Susanne Langer in focus: The symbolic mind. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2011). The ‘quality’ of philosophy: On the aesthetic matrix of Dewey’s pragmatism. In L. Hickman, M. Flamm, K. Skowroński, & J. Rea (Eds.), The continuing relevance of John Dewey: Reflections on aesthetics, morality, science, and society (pp. 43–60). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2014). On not beating one’s wings in the void: Linking contexts of meaning-making. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudary, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Cultural psychology and its future (pp. 131–150). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2016a). Affective semiosis: Philosophical links to a cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, et al. (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being. Annals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 87–103). Cham: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2016b). Between philosophy and cultural psychology: Pragmatist and semiotic reflections on the thresholds of sense. Culture and Psychology, 22(3), 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2016c). Energies of objects between Dewey and Langer. In H. von Franz Engel & S. Marienberg (Eds.), Das Entgegenkommende Denken (pp. 21–38). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2017). Dewey’s Peircean aesthetics. Cuadernos de Sistemática Peirceana, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge; Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New Foreword by A. Sen. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Innis, R.E. (2017). Resisting Forms: Prolegomena to an Aesthetics of Resistance. In: Awad, S., Wagoner, B. (eds) Street Art of Resistance. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63330-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics