Advertisement

Unforeseeable Changes in Circumstances in Contracts in the New Romanian Civil Code

  • Johanna SzekrényesEmail author
Chapter
  • 196 Downloads
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 63)

Abstract

The new Romanian Civil Code regulates the legal institution of unforeseeability, aiming to resolve situations in which one of the contractual subjects faces disproportionate and impossible burdens in his/her contractual legal relationship du to unforeseeable changes of circumstances intervened after the conclusion of the contract. With the entry into force of this code, the institution of unforeseeability enjoys explicit regulation, and as such, it becomes compulsory in the judicial practice. This, however, was not always the case: the legal institution known as the principle unforeseeability had existed before the entry into force of the new Civil Code, but only on a theoretical level, and in this respect, case law was not coherent. The present study offers a retrospect of the case law, with a special regard to the acceptance or rejection of this principle in the different judicial decisions.

References

  1. Anton, G.: Teoria impreviziunii în dreptul român şi dreptul comparat. Dreptul, 7/2000.Google Scholar
  2. Beleiu, Gh.: Teoria impreviziunii – rebus sic stantibus – în dreptul civil român. Dreptul, 10-11/1993.Google Scholar
  3. Bobaşu, C. M.: Consideraţii privind teoria impreviziunii. Dreptul, 3/2006.Google Scholar
  4. Chelaru, E.: Forţa obligatorie a contractului, teoria impreviziunii şi competenţa în materie a instenţelor judecătoreşti. Dreptul, 9/2003.Google Scholar
  5. Costin M. N.; Deleanu S.: Dreptul comerţului internaţional. Vol. II. Special part, Ed. Lumina Lex, Bucharest, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Dobrev D.: Impreviziunea, o cutie a Pandorei în Noul Cod Civil? Noul Cod Civil al României, Comentarii, 2nd edition, Editura Universul Juridic, Bucharest, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Földi A, Hamza G.: A római jog története és Institúciói. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Lisievici, A.: Clauza de impreviziune. Dreptul, 6/2010.Google Scholar
  9. Lukács N.: A clausula rebus sic stantibus elv az ókori és középkori jogtudomány tükrében - article. Iustum Aequum Salutare. XI.2015.1.Google Scholar
  10. Munteanu C.; Ungureanu O.: Reflecţii privind moneda în dreptul privat. Revista de drept privat, 2/2010.Google Scholar
  11. Papp, T.: Opuscula civilia. Magánjogi látlelet. Lectum Kiadó, Szeged, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Pătru, R. S.: Teoria impreviziunii din perspectiva dimensiunii economice și juridice a analizei contractului. Juridical Tribune, Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Pop, L.: Tratat de drept civil, Obligațiile, vol. II, Contractul. Editura Universul Juridic, Bucharest, 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Pop, L.; Popa, I. F.; Vidu, S. T.: Tratat elementar de drept civil. Obligaţiile conform noului Cod Civil. Editura Universul Juridic, Bucharest, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Turcu, I.: Noul Cod civil, Legea nr. 287/2009, Cartea V. Despre obligații, art. 1164–1649, Editura C. H. Beck, Bucharest, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Veress E.: Drept civil. Teoria generală a obligațiilor, ed. 2, Editura C.H. Beck, Bucharest, 2016. Google Scholar
  17. Viorel, G.; Viorel L. A.: Configuraţia impreviziunii în Codul civil. (Legea nr. 287/2009, Republicată). Dreptul, 2/2012.Google Scholar
  18. Zamşa, C. E.: Teoria impreviziunii. Studiu de doctrină şi jurisprudență. Editura Hamangiu, Bucharest, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cluj-Napoca (Kolozsvár/Klausenburg)Romania

Personalised recommendations