Skip to main content

New Particular Agreements in the New Hungarian Civil Code

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 289 Accesses

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 63))

Abstract

The new Hungarian Civil Code incorporates some new particular agreements in Book 6 (Law of Obligations) Part 3 (Particular Agreements). This article reports on four of these newly incorporated particular agreements: the intermediary agreement, the (bank) guarantee, the health insurance contract and trusts. The new Hungarian Civil Code re-implements the private law rules of Council Directive 86/653/EEC among the norms of the commercial agency agreement, which is a special intermediary agreement. According to the new regulations, the (bank) guarantee is a collateral contract and not just a collateral commitment for securing contracts as it was before. The structure of the regulation of insurance agreements has been reviewed by the legislator and the health insurance contract is regulated in a separate chapter after the chapter on indemnity insurance and the chapter on insurance of fixed sums. Trusts, which were previously unknown in Hungarian law, have been incorporated by the new Hungarian Civil Code to offer a new option for property management but they can help to realise other economic or legal aims, too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The NHCC entered into force on 15th March, 2014.

  2. 2.

    Section 67 of the Act CLXXVII of 2013 on the Transitional and Authorizing Provisions Connected to the Promulgation of the Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code.

  3. 3.

    The Supreme Court of Hungary had the same conclusion in judgement 2/2005 PJE: Act CXVII of 2000 is not applicable to real estate agencies because of the lack of continuous authority.

  4. 4.

    See Article 1 of the Directive.

  5. 5.

    Section 1, para 2.

  6. 6.

    Translation of the ComplexJogtár online, WoltersKluwer group.

  7. 7.

    See Section 6:288 and 6:293. para 1.

  8. 8.

    But these special acts contains just a few private law rules, most of their norms are public law rules.

  9. 9.

    “Unless otherwise provided by this Chapter—the regulations governing mandate must apply to intermediary agreement.” See Sections 6:292.

  10. 10.

    See Section 6:291 Para 2.

  11. 11.

    See judgement BH2011.251 of the Hungarian Supreme Court.

  12. 12.

    Act CXVII of 2000 prescribed the written form for all commercial agency agreements in Section 4, which has been a mandatory rule.

  13. 13.

    See Article 13.

  14. 14.

    See Articles 17 and 18.

  15. 15.

    Section 6:294.

  16. 16.

    Act CXVII of 2000 contains different regulations. For example, according to Section 3 Para 1 of Act CXVII of 2000, if the agent is entitled to represent the principal then he or she is entitled to accept the consideration due (receive the purchase price).

  17. 17.

    However, the NHCC contains a special norm in Section 6:438: if the guarantor is a consumer, his or her guarantee must be regarded as a contingent surety agreement.

  18. 18.

    Section 6:432.

  19. 19.

    Section 6:436.

  20. 20.

    E.g. see Article 19 of United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/payments/guarantees/guarantees.pdf.

  21. 21.

    Sections 6:433 and 6:434.

  22. 22.

    See Section 5:407 in Vékás 2010, p. 1044 and the Section 5:392, para 2 of the Act CXX of 2009.

  23. 23.

    We do not know why the NHCC does not follow the international models which regulate this question; see e.g. Article 16 of United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit.

  24. 24.

    “Indemnity insurance” means insurance under which the insurer is obliged to indemnify against loss (suffered on the occurrence of an insured event) in the manner and to the extent specified in the contract, or to perform another service. “Insurance of fixed sums” means insurance under which the insurer is obliged to pay a fixed sum of money (on the occurrence of an insured event). See Section 6:439, para 2.

  25. 25.

    Section 6:487, Sentence 1.

  26. 26.

    The Spanish act on insurance contract (Ley 50/1980, de 8 de octubre, de Contrato de Seguro) uses also the word “illness” and the commentaries say that it means deterioration of health, see Badillo Arias 2011, p. 1637.

  27. 27.

    E.g. the German act on insurance contract (Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, VVG), the Austrian act on insurance contract (Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, VersVG) or the Spanish act on insurance contract.

  28. 28.

    See e.g. the VVG, the VersVG or the Spanish act on insurance contracts. These acts distinguish the indemnity insurance and the insurance of a person.

  29. 29.

    See e.g. the VVG and the VersVG. These acts contain a detailed regulation about the insurer’s rights on unilateral amendment of the contract. See Langheid and Wandt 2009, § 203 and Fenyves, Kronsteiner and Schauer 1998, § 178 f.

  30. 30.

    “An express declaration of trust is a manifestation of the settlor’s consent to the creation of the equitable interests. Express trusts arise because the settlor wants them to arise”. See Birks 2000, p. 280.

  31. 31.

    Section 6:310, para 1.

  32. 32.

    The gratuitous form is exceptional.

  33. 33.

    See Section 6:330.

  34. 34.

    Section 5:147, para 5.

  35. 35.

    Section 6:312.

  36. 36.

    Section 6:313.

  37. 37.

    Section 6:311, para 4.

  38. 38.

    Section 6:316.

  39. 39.

    If they had the right to give instructions to the trustee then their instructions could be open to dispute because of their conflict of interest and this situation must be avoided.

  40. 40.

    Section 6:317.

  41. 41.

    Section 6:323.

References

  • Badillo Arias JA (ed) (2011) Ley de Contrato de Seguro [Act on Insurance Contract]. Aranzadi, Cizur Menor (Navarra)

    Google Scholar 

  • Birks P (ed) (2002) English Private Law, Volume I. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell R, Spulber DF (2005) Trust and Incentives in Agency. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 15(1):45–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenyves A, Kronsteiner F, Schauer M (eds) (1998) VersVG-Novellen—Versicherungsvertragsgesetz Die Novellen ‘92, ‘94 und ‘96 [VersVG Amendments—Act on Insurance Contract Amendment of ‘92, ’94 and ‘96]. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Illés I (2011) Mire jó a bizalmi vagyonkezelés? [What Does the Trust Serve for?]. Jogtudományi Közlöny (66)11:550–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Langheid T, Wandt M (eds) (2009) Münchener Kommentar zum Versicherungsvertragsgesetz, Band 3 [Munich Commentary of the Act on Insurance Contract, Volume 3]. C.H. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár H (2009) Gondolatok a kereskedelmi ügynökök kompenzációs jogáról a Lonsdale ügy kapcsán [Thoughts on the commission agent’s right for compensation in connection with the Lonsdale case]. Themis 22–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sándor I (2013) Gondolatok a bizalmi vagyonkezelés szabályozásáról az új Ptk.-ban [Thoughts about the Regulation of the Trust in the New HCC] http://ptk2013.hu/szakcikkek/sandor-istvan-gondolatok-a-bizalmi-vagyonkezeles-szabalyozasarol-az-uj-ptk-ban/2355 Accessed 18 November 2013

  • Vékás L (ed) (2010) Szakértői Javaslat az új Polgári Törvénykönyv tervezetéhez [Expert Proposal to the Project of the New Civil Code]. Complex, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Vékás L (ed) (2013) A Polgári Törvénykönyv magyarázatokkal [The Civil Code with Commentaries]. Complex, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann Gy (ed) (2013) Polgári Jog Kötelmi Jog Harmadik, Negyedik, Ötödik és Hatodik Rész—Az új Ptk. magyarázata VI/VI. [Civil Law Law of Obligations Part 3, 4, 5 and 6—The Commentary of the New HCC 6/6]. hvgorac, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balázs Tőkey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tőkey, B. (2017). New Particular Agreements in the New Hungarian Civil Code. In: Menyhárd, A., Veress, E. (eds) New Civil Codes in Hungary and Romania. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 63. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63327-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63327-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63326-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63327-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics