Skip to main content

Film and Affect, Theories Entwined: The Case of the War Genre in Saving Private Ryan (Steven Speilberg, 1998)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism

Abstract

This essay on film and affect explores one of the most important developments in film studies in the last thirty years: the shift from psychoanalytic “screen” theories to a more cognitivist and/or phenomenological understanding of affect in the 1980s-present. Elaborating in part on phenomenological theories of cinema (especially Vivian Sobchack), theorists like David Bordwell , Carl Plantinga , Steven Shaviro , and Eugenie Brinkema , among others, understand viewers of cinema very differently: they underscore how not only actors or apparatus work with affect and emotion , but also how narrative itself relies on, fosters, and reaches its zenith by manipulating the affective responses and emotional investments of viewers. To explain and explore such theories, the essay analyzes war films , including Spielberg’s much celebrated Saving Private Ryan, to explore the workings of affect in cinema.

I would like to thank Donald Wehrs and Thomas Blake for their extensive and constructive feedback on this essay, which was much improved with their guidance (while its abiding shortcomings remain entirely my own).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abel, Marco. Violent Affect: Literature, Cinema and Critique after Representation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Film as Art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1933, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Film Essays and Criticism. Translated by Brenda Benthien. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Power and the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basinger, Jeanine. The World War II Combat Film: Anatomy of a Genre. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Introduction: Toward Generic Histories: Film Genre, Genre Theory, and German Film Studies.” In Generic Histories of German Cinema: Genres and its Deviations. Edited by Jaimey Fisher, 1–26. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David and Noël Carroll, eds., Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Poetics of Cinema. Berkeley, CA: Routledge, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkema, Eugenie. The Forms of the Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. Engaging the Moving Image. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Film, Emotion, and Genre” In Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures: An Anthology, ed. Noël Carroll and Jinhee Choi, 217–233. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Interpreting the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Mystifying Movies: Facts and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Erica, ed. Béla Balázs: Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. New York: Berghahn Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Ticeneto Patricia. “Introduction.” In The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, edited by Patricia Ticineto Clough with Jean Halley, 1–33. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, Carol J. Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender and the Modern Horror Film. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casebier, Allan. Film and Phenomenology: Towards a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema, 2 vols., Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated b Robert Hurly, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. London: Althone, 1980, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Pansy. The Emotional Life of Postmodernism. Affect Theory’s Other. London: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Sergei. Film Theory: Essays in Film Theory. Translated by Jay Leyda. New York: Harcourt, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, Torban. Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Genres, Feelings, and Cognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanich, Julian. Cinematic Emotion in Horror Films and Thrillers: The Aesthetic Paradox of Pleasurable Fear. New York: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Mark. The Meaning of the Body. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuleshov, Lev. Kuleshov on Film. Translated and edited by Ronald Levaco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. “The Autonomy of Affect.” Culture Critique 31 (1995): 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, Bruce. Evolution, Cognition, and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, Hugo. “Why We Go to the Movies.” In Hugo Münsterberg on Film: The Photoplay: A Psychological Study and Other Writings, edited by Allan Langdale, 171–190. New York: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl. Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Rhetoric and Representation in Nonfiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl and Greg M. Smith, Eds. Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Julian. “A People of Seers: The Political Aesthetics of Post-War Cinema Revisited.” In Deleuze and Fascism: Security: War: Aesthetics, edited by Brad Evans and Julian Reed, 42–63. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky and Adam Frank, editors. Shame and its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, Steven. The Cinematic Body. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Post-Cinematic Affect. Winchester, UK: Zero Books, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shouse, Eric. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect,” Media-Culture Journal 8, no. 6 (2005): http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php.

  • Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Male Subjectivity at the Margins. New York: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Threshold of the Visible World. New York: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, Vivian. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Phenomenology.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, edited by Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 435–445. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Vivian Sobchack in Conservation with Scott Bukatman.” E-Media Studies 2, no. 1 (2009). doi:10.1349/PS1.1938-6060.A.338.

  • Schlüpmann, Heide and Thomas Y. Levin, “Phenomenology of Film: On Siegfried Kracauer’s Writings of the 1920s.” New German Critique 40 (1987): 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Murray. “Gangsters, Cannibals, Aesthetes, or Apparently Perverse Allegiances,” in Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, edited by Carl Plantigna and Greg M. Smith, 217–38. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Ed S. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Film Induced Affect as a Witness Emotion,” Poetics 23 (1995): 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Ed S. and Nico H. Frijda. “Sentiment in Film Viewing.” In Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, edited by Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith, 48–64. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Routledge, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Linda. Hard Core: Pleasure and the Frenzy of the Visible. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Melodrama Revisited” In Refiguring American Film Genres: History and Theory, ed. Nick Browne, 42–88. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Playing the Race Card: Melodramas of Black & White from Uncle Tom to O. J. Simpson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Porn Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Screening Sex. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, Slavoj. ed., Everything You Want to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock). London: Verso, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fisher, J. (2017). Film and Affect, Theories Entwined: The Case of the War Genre in Saving Private Ryan (Steven Speilberg, 1998). In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics