Skip to main content

Laurence Sterne’s “Poor Maria” as Model of Empathic Response

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Late eighteenth-century England’s textual and visual interest in a melancholy literary figure from the works of Laurence Sterne known as “Poor Maria” valorized and stimulated a subject–object relationship that, considered through the lens of cognitive theory, offers insights into both the widespread cultural-historical phenomenon of “sensibility” and the general nature of empathic response. Paired with the depictions of the character, particularly as popularized through prints, elements of Douglas Watt’s wide-ranging 2007 overview of recent cognitive research illuminate late-eighteenth-century empathic response to Maria, responses shaped by a prevailing cultural atmosphere that emphasized fellow feeling, itself a culmination of a century’s preoccupation with the role of altruism in human nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Steven W. et al. “Impairment of Social and Moral Behavior Related to Early Damage in Human Prefrontal Cortex.” Nature Neuroscience 2, no. 11 (1999): 1032–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizmendi, Thomas G. “Linking Mechanisms: Emotional Contagion, Empathy, and Imagery.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 28, no. 3 (2011): 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Benfield, G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, Janet Beavin et al. “Form and Function in Motor Mimicry Topographic Evidence that the Primary Function Is Communicative.” Human Communication Research 14, no. 3 (1988): 275–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, translated by Harry Zohn, 217–252. New York: Schocken Books, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. “Affect Is the New Trauma.” Minnesota Review (2009): 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, Patricia et al. “Relationship between Empathy and Well-Being in Emergency Room Nurses.” Journal of Emergency Nursing 41, no. 4 (2015): 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, John. Pleasures of the Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brissenden, R. F. Virtue in Distress: Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade. London: Macmillan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, Emile G., Mina Cikara, and Rebecca Saxe. “Minding the Gap: Narrative Descriptions about Mental States Attenuate Parochial Empathy.” PloS One 10, no. 10 (2015): e0140838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, Emile, Nicholas Dufour, and Rebecca Saxe. “How We Know It Hurts: Item Analysis of Written Narratives Reveals Distinct Neural Responses to Others’ Physical Pain and Emotional Suffering.” PloS One 8, no. 4 (2013): e63085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, QiLiang, Jules B. Panksepp, and Garet P. Lahvis. “Empathy Is Moderated by Genetic Background in Mice.” PloS One 4, no. 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004387.

  • Cheng, Yawei et al. “Expertise Modulates the Perception of Pain in Others.” Current Biology 17, no. 19 (2007): 1708–1713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, Giovanna. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copelan, Amy. “Empathic Engagement with Narrative Fictions.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62, no. 2 (2004): 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Frans B. M. and Pier Francesco Ferrari. “Towards a Bottom-Up Perspective on Animal and Human Cognition.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14, no. 5 (2010): 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, Jean. “The Neuroevolution of empathy.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1231 (2011): 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, Jean, Kimberly L. Lewis, and Jason M. Cowell. “Specific Electrophysiological Components Disentangle Affective Sharing and Empathic Concern in Psychopathy.” Journal of Neurophysiology 114, no. 1 (2015): 493–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, Ellen. Art and Intimacy: How the Arts Began. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, John F., Judith L. Allen, and David A. Schroeder, “Specificity of Empathy-Induced Helping: Evidence for Altruistic Motivation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, no. 2 (1990): 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Changming and Clara E. Hill, “The Current State of Empathy Research.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 43, no. 3 (1996): 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Robert. The Language of the Heart. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faflkak, Joel and Richard C. Sha, editors. Romanticism and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, W. B. “‘Betwixt One Passion and Another’: Continuations of Laurence Sterne’s A Sentimental Journey, 1769–1820.” In On Second Thought. Updating the Eighteenth-Century Text, edited by Debra Taylor Bourdeau and Elizabeth Kraft, 123–138. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, W. B. and Brigitte Friant-Kessler. “Towards a Catalogue of Illustrated Editions of the Works of Laurence Sterne and Related Illustrated Works (English Language editions).” The Shandean 16 (2005): 19–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Towards a Catalogue of Illustrated Laurence Sterne: Paintings and Prints.” The Shandean 18 (2007): 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, Elaine, John T Cacioppo, and Richard L Rapson. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, Grit et al. “How Learning Shapes the Empathic Brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, edited by Susan T. Fiaske, 113, no. 1 (2016): 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Richard and Ida Macalpine, editors. Three Hundred Years of Psychiatry 1535–1860. London: Oxford University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Philip L., Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Jean Decety, “How Do We Perceive the Pain of Others? A Window into the Neural Processes Involved in Empathy.” NeuroImage 24, no. 3 (2005): 771–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Kathleen. Lunacy, Law, and Conscience 1744–1845. The Social History of the Care of the Insane. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Limited, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimecki, Olga and Tania Singer. “Empathy from the Perspective of Social Neuroscience.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Human Affective Neuroscience, edited by Jorge Armony and Patrik Vuilleumier, 533–551. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Eva Marie. “’Effects of “Literariness’ on Emotions and on Empathy and Reflection After Reading.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10, no. 1 (2016): 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, Paul. A Polite and Commercial People. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lende, Daniel H. and Greg Downey, editors. The Encultured Brain: An Introduction to Neuroanthropology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar, Raymond A. et al. “Bookworms versus Nerds: Exposure to Fiction versus Non-Fiction, Divergent Associations with Social Ability, and the Simulation of Fictional Social Worlds.” Journal of Research in Personality 40, no. 5 (2006): 694–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masserman, Jules H., Stanley Wechkin, and William Terris. “‘Altruistic’ Behavior in Rhesus Monkeys.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 121, issue 6 (1964): 584–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, John. Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford, UK: Clarendon, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, Steven L. “Does Empathy Lead to Anything More than Superficial Helping?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, no. 3 (1997): 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbould, M. C. “Contact Incarnate and Touching Fiction in Sterne and Sterneana.” In Defining and Redefining Space in the English-Speaking World, edited by Fanny Moghaddassi, Ghislain Potriquet, and Anne Bandry-Scubbi, 167–182. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, G. W. “Addiction to Nicotine Is Due to High Intrinsic Levels of Dopamine.” Medical Hypotheses 38, no. 3 (1992): 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy. English Society in the Eighteenth Century. London: Penguin, 1990, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, Stephanie D. and Frans B. M. de Waal. “Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.” 2001. http://www.wisebrain.org/papers/EmpathyOrigins.pdf.

  • Rameson, Lian T., Sylvia A. Morelli, and Matthew D. Lieberman. “The Neural Correlates of Empathy: Experience, Automaticity, and Prosocial Behavior.” Journal of Cogntiive Neuroscience 24, no. 1 (2011): 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanafelt, Tait D. et al. “Relationship Between Increased Personal Well-Being and Enhanced Empathy Among Internal Medicine Residents.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, no. 7 (2005): 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, Ellen. Preface to The Work of Fiction: Cognition, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Alan Richardson and Ellen Spolsky, vii-xiii. London: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, G. Gabrielle. “Theorizing Imagery, Aesthetics, and Doubly Directed States.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies, edited by Liza Zunshine, 246–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, Ervin and Johanna Vollhardt. “Altruism Born of Suffering: The Roots of Caring and Helping After Victimization and Other Trauma.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 78, no. 3 (2008): 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Lawrence. A Sentimental Journey through France and Italy, the Florida Edition of the Works of Laurence Sterne, vol. 6, edited by Melvyn New and W. G. Day. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman, The Florida Edition of the Works of Laurence Sterne, vol. 2, edited by Melvyn New and Joan New. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Matthew R. et al. “How Do Distress and Well-being Relate to Medical Student Empathy? A Multicenter Study.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22, no. 2 (2007): 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzefovsky, Florina et al. “The Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene Shows a Gender-Sensitive Association With Cognitive Empathy: Evidence From Two Independent Samples.” Emotion 14, no. 4 (2014): 712–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkow, Nora D. et al. “Cocaine Cues and Dopamine in Dorsal Striatum: Mechanism of Craving in Cocaine Addiction.” Journal of Neuroscience 26, no. 24 (2006): 6583–6588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, Douglas. “Toward a Neuroscience of Empathy: Integrating Affective and Cognitive Perspectives.” Neuro-Psychoanalysis 9, no. 2 (2007): 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunshine, Lisa. “Introduction.” In Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, edited by Lisa Zunshine, 1–33. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gerard, W.B. (2017). Laurence Sterne’s “Poor Maria” as Model of Empathic Response. In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics