Abstract
In several European countries decentralization has promoted the creation of Regional Governments (RGs) with high levels of competence and responsibilities, such as promoting good governance and sustainability. Information and communication technologies (ICTs), and hence, the adoption of e-government has contributed to the adoption and dissemination of government transparency in a usable and accessible way. In this chapter, we study the transparency, accessibility and usability of websites of Spanish RGs.
As a first step, we want to know if the implementation of e-government has improved transparency about sustainability. In a second step, we want to know if citizens perceive the advantages of the use of governmental websites as a medium of transparency assessing the accessibility and usability of RG’s websites. The results show that the most information disclosed is environmental information. Furthermore, RGs information disclosure is determined by citizens’ perception of accessibility and usability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). A comparative analysis of transparency in sustainability reporting by local and regional governments. Lex Localis - Journal of Self-Government, 12(1), 55–78.
Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2015). Factors determining online sustainability reporting by local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 79–109.
Angluin, D., & Scapens, R. (2000). Transparency, accounting knowledge and perceived fairness in UK universities’ resource allocation: Results from a survey of accounting and finance. British Accounting Review, 32(1), 1–42.
Bäck, H., Debus, M., Müller, J., & Bäck, H. (2013). Regional government formation in varying multilevel contexts: A comparison of eight European countries. Regional Studies, 47(3), 368–387.
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.
Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667–716.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ITCs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.
Charron, N. (2016). Quality of government, regional autonomy and cohesion policy allocations to EU regions. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU (pp. 92–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Colomer, J. M. (1998). The Spanish “State of autonomies”: Non-institutional federalism. West European Politics, 21(4), 40–52.
Council of Europe. (2011). Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:306:0041:0047:en:PDF
Hines, R. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251–261.
Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210.
Hopwood, A. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 156–182.
IGAE. (2013). Avance actuación económica y financiera de las Administraciones Públicas. Madrid: IGAE. Retrieved from http://www.igae.pap.minhap.gob.es/sitios/igae/es-ES/ContabilidadNacional/infadmPublicas/Documents/Informes%20Anuales/Avance_AAPP_2013.pdf.
International Transparency (IT). (2015). Índice de Transparencia de las CCAA. Retrieved from http://www.transparencia.org.es/
Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 371–376.
Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. London: The MIT Press.
La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & de Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web. Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34, 411–446.
León, S. (2014). How does decentralization affect electoral competition of state-wide parties? Evidence from Spain. Party Politics, 20(3), 391–402.
Lodhia, S., Jacobs, K., & Park, Y. J. (2012). Driving public sector environmental reporting. Public Management Review, 14(5), 631–647.
Lourenço, I. C., Callen, J. L., Branco, M. C., & Curto, J. D. (2014). The value relevance of reputation for sustainability leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 17–28.
Meijer, A. J. (2007). Publishing public performance results on the Internet. Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organisations to account? Government Information Quarterly, 24, 165–185.
Navarro-Galera, A., Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2016). Online dissemination of information on sustainability in regional governments. Effects of technological factors. Government information Quarterly, 33(1), 53–66.
Ortiz-Rodríguez, D., Navarro-Galera, A., & Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J. (2015). The influence of administrative culture on sustainability transparency in European local governments. Administration and Society. doi:10.1177/0095399715616838.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: Go to the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration, 85(2), 449–472.
Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2009). E-government evolution in EU local governments: A comparative perspective. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1137–1168.
Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 957–970.
Rodríguez Bolivar, M. P., & Navarro Galera, A. (2007). Could fair value accounting be useful, under NPM models, for users of financial information? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 473–502.
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, A. M. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557–602.
Rodríguez-Posé, A., di Cataldo, M., & Rainoldi, A. (2014). The role of government institutions for smart specialisation and regional development. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre.
Sánchez, J. (2004). Introducción a la Estadística Empresarial. Retrieved from http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/libreria/index.htm
Verge, T. (2013). Party strategies on territorial reform: State-wide parties and the state of autonomies in Spain. West European Politics, 36(2), 317–337.
World Commission. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alcaraz-Quiles, F.J., Urquia-Grande, E., Muñoz-Colomina, C.I., Rautiainen, A. (2018). E-Government Implementation: Transparency, Accessibility and Usability of Government Websites. In: Alcaide Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (eds) International E-Government Development . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63283-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63284-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)