Skip to main content

Mapping Climate Justice

Abstract

This chapter maps international climate change mitigation and adaptation regimes in order to derive fair climate stability implementation strategies. Based on insights on the current endeavor to finance climate change mitigation and adaptation around the globe, a three-dimensional climate justice approach will be introduced to share the burden of climate change fair within society. First, climate justice within a country should pay tribute to the fact that low- and high-income households share the same burden proportional to their dispensable income. Secondly, fair climate change burden sharing between countries comprises of argumentations that those countries benefiting more from a stable climate should also bear a higher burden of climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts. Thirdly, climate justice over time is proposed in an innovative climate change burden sharing strategy. Innovative compensation schemes to share the burden of climate change with bonds help weight the burden of climate change more equally between today’s and tomorrow’s society. Deriving respective policy recommendations for the wider climate change community is aimed at ensuring to share the burden but also the benefits of climate change within society, between countries and over time in an equitable and fair way.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63281-0_4
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-63281-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.businessinsider.com/map-shows-how-much-of-nyc-could-be-underwater-in-200-years-2015-7

  2. 2.

    https://www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law/treaties-customary-law/geneva-conventions

  3. 3.

    http://cisdl.org/public/docs/news/brief_common.pdf

  4. 4.

    http://www.unep.org/documents.multilingual/default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163

References

  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. S. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103–125.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. T. (1957). Economic analysis and policy in underdeveloped countries. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy. Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 15–39). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V., & Ahmed, E. (2005). A threat to tax morale: The case of Australian higher education policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 523–540.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bürgenmeier, B. (1994). Environmental policy: Beyond the economic dimension. In B. Bürgenmeier (Ed.), Economy, environment, and technology: A socio-economic approach (pp. 166–175). New York: Armonk Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, M. A., Creager, A. N., Elga, A., Felton, E., Katz, St. N., Massey, W. A., et al. (2013). Global systemic risk: Proposal for a research community. Working paper. Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2015). Carbon and inequality: From Kyoto to Paris. Paris, France: Paris School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct (pp. 44–58). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169–193.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, J. (2008). Discovery of Rosetta: The stone that unlocked the mysteries of ancient Egypt. London: Constable & Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberger, R., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Democratic governance for a globalized world. Kyklos, 55(2), 265–288.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87–99.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1992). Tertium datur: Pricing, regulation and intrinsic motivation. Kyklos, 45(2), 161–184.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, M., & Markowitz, E. M. (2015). Climate change: Multidisciplinary perspectives on climate ethics. Climatic Change, 130(3), 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D., Kahneman, D., & Kunreuther, H. (1994). How the method and scope of public funding affects willingness to pay for public goods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 48–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A., & Semmler, W. (2008). The global environment, natural resources, and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J. D. (2012). Ideology, psychology, and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hasseldine, J. D. (1998). Prospect theory and tax reporting decisions: Implications for tax administrators. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 52(11), 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. M. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, G. A. J., & Opschoor, J. B. (1991). Economics of sustainability or the sustainability of economics: Different paradigms. Ecological Economics, 4, 93–115.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1982). The psychology of taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marron, D. B., & Morris, A. C. (2016). How to use carbon tax revenues. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center Urban Institute & Brookings Institution.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, A. (2001). Taxing culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). Mapping the global commons: The economics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, M., O’Neill, B. C., Webster, M., & Agrawal, S. (2011). Climate change: The limits of consensus. Science, 317(5844), 1505–1506.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, M. (2005). The specificity of social dilemma situations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(3), 431–441.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Puaschunder, J. M. (2015). Trust and reciprocity drive social common goods allocation norms. In Proceedings of the 2015 Cambridge Business & Economics Conference. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puaschunder, J. M. (2016). Intergenerational climate change burden sharing: An economics of climate stability research agenda proposal. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Economics and Commerce, 16(3), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovenskaya, E. (2005). Sensitivity and cost-benefit analyses of emission-constrained technological growth under uncertainty in natural emission. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Interim Report. Laxenburg, Austria, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovenskaya, E. (2008). Optimal economic growth under stochastic environmental impact: Sensitivity analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Interim Report. Laxenburg, Austria, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. (2014). Climate change and intergenerational well-being. In L. Bernard & W. Semmler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the macroeconomics of global warming (pp. 248–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 121–137.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2015). Green bonds attract private sector climate finance, World Bank Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Economic Forum Report. (2015). Davos, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657–683.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & De Cremer, D. (2006). How do we promote cooperation in groups, organizations, and societies? In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging social psychology. Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 427–433). Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art. In W. B. G. Librand, D. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Report. (2015). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Puaschunder, J. (2020). Mapping Climate Justice. In: Governance & Climate Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63281-0_4

Download citation