Global Responsible Intergenerational Leadership



Global responsible intergenerational leadership is introduced by mapping the social representations of intergenerational imbalances in the age of climate change. The multi-faceted investigation of intergenerational equity serves the greater goal to ensure justice as a responsibility for the future. Social representations on intergenerational equity featured notions of ecologic decline related to climate change and unsustainable consumption. Climate change was found to be considered as a major future external influence on humankind. Stakeholder views of intergenerational equity included environmentalism on public officials’ and international organizations’ agendas. Politicians connected intergenerational justice to human rights. Promoting solidarity, ethicality and social responsibility but also innovations and future investment implement intergenerational equity. Long-term solutions may stem from institutional regulation and foresighted taxation but also open debates informing global leaders about complex intertemporal frictions.


  1. Almansa, C., & Martinez-Paz, J. M. (2011). Intergenerational equity and dual discounting. Environment and Development Economics, 16, 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Rosa, A. S. (1994). From theory to metatheory in social representations: The lines of argumentation of a theoretical-methodological debate. Social Science Information, 33, 273–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durkheim, E. (1898). Représentations individuelles et répresentations collectives: Sociologie et philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  4. Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  5. Moscovici, S. (1984). The myth of the lonely paradigm: A rejoinder. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 51, 939–968.Google Scholar
  6. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Puaschunder, J. M. (2015). On the social representations of intergenerational equity. Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 4(4), 78–99.Google Scholar
  8. Puaschunder, J. M. (2016). The call for global responsible intergenerational leadership in the corporate world: The quest for an integration of intergenerational equity in contemporary Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) models. In D. Jamali (Ed.), Comparative perspectives in global corporate social responsibility (pp. 275–288). Hershey: IGI Global Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage Book Series.Google Scholar
  9. Puaschunder, J. M., & Schwarz, G. (2012). The future is now: How joint decision making curbs hyperbolic discounting but blurs social responsibility in the intergenerational equity public policy making domain. Working paper. Harvard Law School. Retrieved from
  10. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New School & Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations