Intergenerational Equity



The idea of intergenerational equity is as old as humankind. Intergenerational equity arises from the elderly wanting their offspring to prosper in at least as favorable conditions as experienced. The natural behavioral law of intergenerational equity was lived for centuries and transpired in the social compound as practiced in ancient, traditional customs ever since. Intergenerational equality is grounded on a human-imbued wish for fairness as there is an ethical preference for fair welfare distribution among different generations. Acknowledging intergenerational equity as a natural behavioral law may serve as a legal basis for the codification of human rights of intergenerational equity. A pro-active overcompliance with contemporary sustainability legislation may stem from a broader social contract within society to incorporate novel responsibilities and embrace discretionary activities that contribute to societal welfare and the well-being of future generations. Globalization increasing internationalization of public and private concerns create a need for an international outlook of intergenerational equity in order to solve global common goods predicaments and draw inferences on the harmonization of intergenerational justice on a global scale in the age of climate change in the twenty-first century.


  1. Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., et al. (2011). Has the earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benke, N., & Meissel, F.-S. (2008). Übungsbuch Römisches Sachenrecht. Vienna: Manz.Google Scholar
  3. Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Latour, B. (2014). On some of the affects of capitalism. Lecture at the Royal Academy, Copenhagen, February 26.Google Scholar
  5. Luf, G. (2011). Grundfragen der Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtsethik: Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaften und ihre Methoden. Vienna: Manz.Google Scholar
  6. Mamor, A. (2010). Philosophy of law. Princeton: Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy.Google Scholar
  7. Mayer, H. (2010). Öffentliches Recht: Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaften und ihre Methoden. Vienna: Manz.Google Scholar
  8. Puaschunder, J. M. (2017a). Ethical decision making under social uncertainty: An introduction to Überethicality. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 78–89.Google Scholar
  9. Puaschunder, J. M. (2017b). Global responsible intergenerational leadership: A conceptual framework and implementation guidance for intergenerational fairness. Wilmington, DE: Vernon Art & Science.Google Scholar
  10. Puaschunder, J. M. (2018). Intergenerational responsibility in the 21st century. Wilmington, DE: Vernon Art & Science.Google Scholar
  11. Sachs, J. D. (2014). Climate change and intergenerational well-being. In L. Bernard & W. Semmler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the macroeconomics of global warming (pp. 248–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New School & Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations