Advertisement

Accessing and Securing Conceptual and Symbolic Knowledge Required for Digital Era Work

  • Stephen BillettEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 21)

Abstract

Much of what we learn arises through direct experiencing, and the kinds of learning required for work are no exception here. Yet, some of the knowledge needing to be learnt for contemporary work cannot be directly experienced. It is opaque, hidden or abstracted in some way and, therefore, cannot be directly experienced. A feature of work requirements in the digital era is a growing requirement to access and appropriate conceptual and symbolic knowledge, which is not immediately evident or accessible in workplaces. This presents particular challenges for its effective learning and requires ways for making it accessible and guiding its learning. It needs to be secured through means other than direct experiencing and without assistance from cues and clues afforded by the physical environment. This chapter draws upon recent findings from studies of contemporary work and human cognition to consider how these important elements of learning for contemporary work might best be realised through guidance and pedagogic interventions, and learners’ intentional efforts. It does so by engaging with premises advanced through literature from social constructivism and cognitive science. These accounts offer bases upon which these kinds of hard-to-access and hard-to-learn knowledge that might be developed for work that increasingly relies on symbolic form of knowledge for its enactment (i.e. digitised work). These are essential for contemporary working life, and we need to know how they can be secured through experiences in both educational and workplace settings.

Keywords

Conceptual and symbolic knowledge Pedagogic practices Guided learning Remaking occupations Digital work Readiness Person-dependence Changing work Learning 

References

  1. Ausubel, D. P., & Novak, J. D. (1978). Meaningful reception learning and retention. In D. P. Ausubel, J. D. Novak, & H. Hanesian (Eds.), Educational psychology: A cognitive review (pp. 114–160). New York: Holt Reinhardt and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Barley, S., & Batt, R. (1995). The new crafts: The rise of the technical labour force and its implication for the organisation of work. Retrieved from Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  3. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2003). Sociogeneses, activity and ontogeny. Culture and Psychology, 9(2), 133–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billett, S. (2006). Work, change and workers. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billett, S. (2009a). Conceptualising learning experiences: Contributions and mediations of the social, personal and brute. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2009b). Personal epistemologies, work and learning. Educational Research Review, 4, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2010). The practices of learning through occupations. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 59–81). Dodrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billett, S. (2014). Mimetic learning at work: Learning in the circumstances of practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Billett, S. (2015a). Work, discretion and learning: Processes of learning and development at work. International Journal of Training Research, 13(3).Google Scholar
  11. Billett, S. (2015b). Integrating practice-based experiences into higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Billett, S. (2015c). Readiness and learning in healthcare education. Clinical Teacher, 12, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Billett, S., Smith, R., & Barker, M. (2005). Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(3), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatham, R. E. (2009). The 20th century revolution in military training. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The development of professional expertise (pp. 27–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colin, K. (2004). Workplace’s learning and life. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4(1), 24–38.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Diakidoy, I.-A. N., & Kendeou, P. (2001). Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: A comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches. Learning and Instruction, 11, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Downey, G. (2010). Practice without theory: A neuroanthropological perspective on embodied learning. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS), 16(Supplement 1), S22–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebrey, P. B. (1996). China: Illustrated history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltowich, & R. R. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gott, S. (1989). Apprenticeship instruction for real-world tasks: The co-ordination of procedures, mental models, and strategies. Review of Research in Education, 15, 97–169.Google Scholar
  23. Gowlland, G. (2012). Learning craft skills in China: Apprenticeship and social capital in an artisan community of practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43(4), 358–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: The implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Groen, G. J., & Patel, P. (1988). The relationship between comprehension and reasoning in medical expertise. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & R. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 287–310). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, K. (2007). The desire to learn: An analysis of knowledge-seeking practices among professionals. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan, B. (1989). Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Social Science and Medicine, 28(9), 925–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, J. (2011). Dynamic integrated learning: Managing knowledge development in road transport. (PHD), Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  29. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lodge, R. C. (1947). Plato’s theory of education. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  31. Makovichy, N. (2010). ‘Something to talk about’: Notation and knowledge-making among central Slovak lace-makers. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS), 16(Supplement S1), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Introduction: The significance of intentionality. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marchand, T. H. J. (2008). Muscles, morals and mind: Craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. British Journal of Education Studies, 56(3), 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, L. M. W., & Scribner, S. (1991). Laboratory for cognitive studies of work: A case study of the intellectual implications of a new technology. Teachers College Record, 92(4), 582–602.Google Scholar
  35. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Organisation for Economic Co-operational and Development. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Plotkin, H. (1994). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rice, T. (2008). Beautiful murmurs: Stescopic listening and acoustic objectification. The Senses and Society, 3(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
  42. Scribner, S. (1985a). Knowledge at work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scribner, S. (1985b). Vygostky’s use of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Singleton, J. (1989). The Japanese folkcraft pottery apprenticeship: Cultural patterns of an educational institution. In M. W. Coy (Ed.), Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again (pp. 13–30). New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
  45. Sun, R., Merrill, E., & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill development. Cognitive Science, 25, 203–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2004). The accident at three mile Island. Retrieved from Washington.Google Scholar
  47. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2002). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419.Google Scholar
  50. Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whalley, P., & Barley, S. R. (1997). Technical work in the division of labor: Stalking the wily anomaly. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 24–52). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia

Personalised recommendations