Abstract
The right on informational privacy is – at a first glance – not related to the world of work, but rather describes the right of an individual regarding the disclosure and utilization of personal data. Comprehensive and complete informational privacy is an illusion, anyway. The increasing overlapping between private and working life on the one hand and the nowadays use of information technology on the other hand means that the idea of informational privacy needs to be rediscussed. This contribution provides a critical reflection of the concept of informational privacy and attempts to develop a new understanding of the digital economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AWP (2016). Kosten und fehlendes Knowhow bremsen Digitalisierungsvorhaben. AWP Finanznachrichten, 416, n.p.
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1017–1041. doi:10.1159/000360196.
Bitkom. (2016). Digitale Agenda der Bundesregierung nach zwei Jahren zu großen Teilen umgesetzt. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from https://www.bitkom.org/Presse/Presseinformation/DigitaleAgenda-der-Bundesregierung-nach-zwei-Jahren-zu-grossen-Teilen-umgesetzt.html
Choi, B., et al. (2016). The effects of general privacy concerns and transactional privacy concerns on Facebook apps usage. Information Management, 53(7), 868–877. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.003.
Cohen, J. E. (2000). Examined lives: Informational privacy and the subject as object. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1373–1438.
Dachwitz, I. (2017). ePrivacy-Novelle: EU-Kommission bleibt beim Datenschutz auf halber Strecke stehen. Retrieved January 26, 2017, from https://netzpolitik.org/2017/eprivacy-novelle-eu-kommission-bleibt-beim-datenschutz-auf-halber-strecke-stehen/
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080.
Eco. (2016). 2 Jahre Digitale Agenda: Internetwirtschaft und Politik ziehen gemeinsame Bilanz. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from https://www.eco.de/2016/pressemeldungen/2-jahre-digitale-agenda-internetwirtschaft-und-politik-ziehen-gemeinsame-bilanz.html
Federal Trade Commision (FTC). (2012). Protecting consumer in an era of rapid change: Recommendations for businesses and policymakers. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-recommendations/120326privacyreport.pdf
Freiling, et al. (2014). Technische Sicherheit und Informationssicherheit. Informatik-Spektrum, 37(1), 14–24.
GDV. (2015). Positionspapier des Gesamtverbandes der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft zur Digitalen Agenda 2014–2017 der Bundesregierung. Retrieved from September 29, 2016, from http://www.gdv.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/GDV_Positionspapier_Digitale_Agenda_2015.pdf
Gluck, J. et al. (2016). How short is too short? Implications of length and framing on the effectiveness of privacy notices. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (pp. 321–340).
Hansen-Oest, S., & Heidrich, J. (2016). Neu verordnet: Welche Änderungen die neue EU-Datenschutz-Regulierung in Deutschland bringen wird. C’t Magazin für Computertechnik, 166.
Hofstetter, Y. (2014). Sie wissen alles: Wie intelligente Menschen in unser Leben eindringen und warum wir für unsere Freiheit kämpfen müssen. München: Bertelsmann.
Hornung, G., & Schnabel, C. (2009). Data protection in Germany I: The population census decision and the right to informational self-determination. Computer Law & Security Review, 25(1), 84–88. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2008.11.002.
Juris GmbH. (2015). Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG). Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/bdsg_1990/gesamt.pdf
Kelley, P. G. et al. (2009). A “nutrition label” for privacy. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security SOUPS. Article No. 4, doi:10.1145/1572532.1572538.
Kelley, P.G. et al. (2010). Standardizing privacy notices: An online study of the nutrition label approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1573–1582). doi:10.1145/1753326.1753561.
LDA. (2013). Akteneinsichts- und Informationszugangsgesetz. Retrieved October 15, 2016, from http://www.lda.brandenburg.de/media_fast/4055/AIG_2013.pdf
Malhotra, N. K., et al. (2004). Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a casual model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. doi:10/1287.
Norberg, P. A., et al. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 100–126. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x.
Pavlou, P. A. (2011). State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quarterly, 35, 977–988.
Podlech, A. (1976). Aufgaben und Problematik des Datenschutzes. Datenverarbeitung im Recht, 5, 23–39.
Rössler, B. (2001). Der Wert des Privaten. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
Roßnagel, A. (2007). Informationelle Selbstbestimmung in der Welt des Ubiquitous Computing. In F. Mattern (Ed.), Die Informatisierung des Alltags (pp. 265–289). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71455-2_14.
Rouvroy, A., & Poullet, Y. (2009). The right to informational self-determination and the value of self development: Reassessing the importance of privacy for democracy. In S. Gutwirth et al. (Eds.), Reinventing data protection (pp. 45–76). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9498-9_2.
Schaaf, C. (2015). Datensicherheit und Informationsschutz. In T. Jäger (Ed.), Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren (pp. 533–542). Wiesbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02753-7_45.
Smith, H., et al. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20, 167–196. doi:10.2307/249477.
Smith, H. J., et al. (2011). Theory and review information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS QuarterlyInformation Privacy Research, 35(4), 989–1015.
Spink, A., & Cole, C. (2007). Information behavior: A socio-cognitive ability. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 258–274. doi:10.1177/147470490700500201.
Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 26–49. doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97.
Stigler, G. J. (1980). An introduction to privacy in economics and politics. Journal of Legal Studies, 9(4), 645–648. Article 2.
Toker, K. A. (2013). Data protection. In S. Idowu et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 752–759). Berlin: Springer.
Trute, H.H. (2003). Verfassungsrechtliche Grundlagen. In A. Roßnagel (Ed.), Handbuch Datenschutzrecht (pp. 156–187).
Weichert, T. (2013). Grenzen des Datenschutzes: Im internationalen Kontext. Retrieved October 14, 2016, from https://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/vortraege/20131120-weichert-grenzen-des-datenschutzes.pdf
Weka Media. (2016). Datenschutz-Grundverordnung: Viele Unternehmen nicht vorbereitet. Retrieved October 14, 2016, from https://www.datenschutz-praxis.de/fachnews/datenschutz-grundverordnung-viele-unternehmen-nicht-vorbereitet/
Westin, A. F. (1969). Privacy and freedom. Administrative Law Review, 22(1), 101–106.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Special issue on information science research. Informing Science, 3(2), 49–55.
ZVEI. (2015). Positionspapier-Kurzfassung: Digitale Agenda. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from http://www.zvei.org/Verband/Publikationen/Seiten/Digitale-Agenda-Positionspapier-Kurzfassung.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lehner, F., Dzepina, A. (2018). Information Privacy in a Digitalized World: Private Issue or Public Matter?. In: Harteis, C. (eds) The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63256-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63257-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)