Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contributions of Technological and Natech Disaster Research to the Social Science Disaster Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disaster Research

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The development of a disaster social science paradigm is explored in this chapter. A disaster paradigm emerged in the years following WWII and came to dominate the field. Relying on theories associated with functionalism, collective behavior, and social organization, this paradigm used case studies, interviews, secondary data analysis, and surveys to address research questions that increasingly focused on preparation, response, recovery, and mitigation activities associated with sudden-onset natural hazards and disasters. Beginning in the 1970s, extreme events in the form of technological disasters presented anomalies to this dominant paradigm and gave rise to alternative perspectives in the study of disasters. These perspectives introduced new concepts, theories, and approaches that are increasingly being incorporated into this disaster social science paradigm. Recognition of “natech” and “techna” hazards and disasters further reveals the social embeddedness of all hazards, risks, and disasters and presents new challenges to this evolving paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the term “na-tech” was initially hyphenated by Showalter and Myers, more recent literature typically does not hyphenate “natech.”

References

  • Alter, J. (2005). The other America. Newsweek, September 19, CXLVI(12), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City, NJ, USA: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Fleming, I., & Singer, J. E. (1982). Stress at Three Mile Island: Applying psychological impact analysis. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 3, pp. 217–248).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Fleming, I., & Singer, J. E. (1983). Coping with victimization by technological disaster. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1996). World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. Theory, Culture and Society, 13(4), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkley, D. (2006). The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast. New York, NY, USA: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, S. R., & Kroll-Smith, J. S. (1985). The chronic technical disaster: Toward a social scientific perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 66(3), 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, S. R., & Kroll-Smith, J. S. (1992). Controllability, social breakdown and technological disasters: The case of the Centralia coal mine fire. In S. K. Majundmar, G. S. Forbes, E. W. Miller, & R. F. Schmalz (Eds.), Natural and technological disasters: Causes, effects and preventive measures (pp. 337–349). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, A. M., Steinberg, L. J., Vetere Arellano, A. L., Nordvik, J. P., & Pisano, F. (2004). State of the art in natech risk management. European Commission: EUR 21292 EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbertson, B. H., & Nigg, J. M. (1987). Technological disaster and the nontherapeutic community: A question of true victimization. Environment and Behavior, 19(4), 462–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York, NY, USA: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R. R. (1970). Organizational involvement and changes in community structure in disaster. American Behavioral Scientist, 13, 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, M. (2000). Outsiders just don’t understand. In M. J. Cohen (Ed.), Risk in the modern age: Social theory, science and environmental decision-making (pp. 123–142). New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, M. ([1988] 2004). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada, J., Hofmeister, J., Mason, R., McNabb, S., Morrison, E., Reynolds, S., et al. (1993). Social indicators study of Alaskan coastal villages: IV. Postspill key informant summaries: Schedule C Communities, Part I (Cordova, Tatitlek, Valdez) and Part 2 (Kenai, Tyonek, Seldovia, Kodiak City, Karluk, Old Harbor, Chignik). Prepared for Minerals Management Service, Alaska OCS Environmental Studies Program, Technical Report 155, OCS Study MMS 92-0052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York, NY, USA: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. (1994). A new species of trouble: Explorations in disasters, trauma, and community. New York, NY, USA: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B., Emery, M., Fey, S., & Bregendahl, C. (2008). Community capitals: A tool for evaluating strategic interventions and projects. In Goreham (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rural America: The land and people (pp. 1186–1187). Millerton, NY, USA: Grey House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B., & Flora, Jan L. (1993). Entrepreneurial social infrastructure: A necessary ingredient. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 529, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowlkes, M. R., & Miller, P. Y. (1982). Love Canal: The social construction of disaster. Washington, D.C., USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Available at: http://library.buffalo.edu/libraries/specialcollections/lovecanal/documents/disaster_gif/records/fowlk3.html.

  • Freudenburg, W. R. (1993). Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions. Social Forces, 71, 909–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R. (1997). Contamination, corrosion and the social order: An overview. Current Sociology, 45(3), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R. (2000). The ‘risk society’ reconsidered: Recreancy, the division of labor, and risks to the social fabric. In M. J. Cohen (Ed.), Risk in the modern age: Social theory, science and environmental decision-making (pp. 107–122). New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R., Gramling, R., Laska, S., & Erikson, K. (2009). Catastrophe in the making: The engineering of Katrina and the disasters of tomorrow. Washington, D.C., USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W. R., & Jones, T. (1991). Attitudes and stress in the presence of technological risk: A test of the Supreme Court hypothesis. Social Forces, 9(4), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frickel, S. (2006). Our toxic gumbo: Recipe for a politics of environmental knowledge. Available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Frickel/

  • Fritz, C. E. (1961). Disaster. In R. K. Merton & R. A. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E. (2006). Leaving New Orleans: Social stratification, networks, and hurricane evacuation. Available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Fussell/.

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A. (1986). A disaster impact assessment model: An empirical study of a technological disaster. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A. (1994). Environmental disaster and fishery co-management in a natural resource community: Impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In C. L. Dyer & J. R. McGoodwin (Eds.), Folk management in the world’s fisheries: Implications for fisheries managers (pp. 207–235). Boulder, CO, USA: University of Colorado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A. (2007). Secondary trauma or secondary disaster? Insights from Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Spectrum, 27(6), 613–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A., & Picou, J. S. (1991). The social-psychological impacts of a technological accident: Collective stress and perceived health risk. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 27(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A., & Picou, J. S. (1997). The day the water died: Cultural impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In J. S. Picou, D. A. Gill, & M. Cohen (Eds.), The Exxon Valdez disaster: Readings on a modern social problem (pp. 167–191). Dubuque, IA, USA: Kendall-Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A., Picou, J. S., & Ritchie, L. A. (2012). The 2010 BP oil spill and 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill: A comparison of initial social impacts. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. A., Ritchie, L. A., & Picou, J. S. (2016). Sociocultural and psychosocial impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill: Twenty-four years of research in Cordova, Alaska. Extractive Industries and Society , 3, 1105-1116.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.09.004.

  • Gleser, G. C., Green, B. L., & Winget, C. (1981). Prolonged psychosocial effects of disaster: A study of Buffalo Creek. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. L. (1996). Traumatic stress and disaster: Mental health effects and factors influencing adaptation. International Review of Psychiatry, 2, 177–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. L., Lindy, J. D., Grace, M. C., Gleser, G. C., Leonard, A. C., Korol, M., et al. (1990). Buffalo Creek survivors in the second decade: Stability of stress symptoms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatrics, 60(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, G., & Squires, C. (2006). There is no such thing as a natural disaster: Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (Ed.). (1983). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Boston, MA, USA: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impact Assessment, Inc. (IAI). (1990). Economic, social and psychological impact assessment of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Final Report prepared for Oiled Mayors Subcommittee, Alaska Conference of Mayors. Anchorage, Alaska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impact Assessment, Inc. (IAI). (1998). Exxon Valdez oil spill, cleanup and litigation: A collection of social impacts information and analysis, final report, Volume 1. Prepared for the Minerals Management Service. LaJolla, CA, USA: Impact Assessment, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R., & Pijawka, K. D. (1985). Societal response to hazards and major hazard events: Comparing natural and technological hazards. Public Administration Review, 45, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G. (1989). Social structure and disaster. Newark, DE, USA: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll-Smith, J. S., Baxter, V., & Jenkins, P. (2015). Left to chance: Hurricane Katrina and the story of two New Orleans neighborhoods. Austin, TX, USA: University of Austin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll-Smith, J. S., & Couch, S. R. (1991). What is a disaster? An ecological symbolic approach to resolving the definitional debate. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll-Smith, J. S., & Couch, S. R. (1993a). Symbols, ecology and contamination: Case studies in the ecological-symbolic approach to disaster. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 5, 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll-Smith, J. S., & Couch, S. R. (1993b). Technological hazards: Social responses as traumatic stressors. In J. P. Wilson & B. Raphael (Eds.), International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes (pp. 79–91). New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. ([1962] 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2d ed.). Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1982). Love Canal: Science, politics, and people. Lexington, MA, USA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, D.C., USA: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). (2014). Community resilience planning guide, volume II. Available at https://www.nist.gov/el/resilience/community-resilience-planning-guide.

  • Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., & Watson, P. J. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part II. Summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry, 65(3), 240–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (2006). Disasters and forced migration in the 21st century. Available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Oliver-Smith/.

  • Palinkas, L. A., Downs, M. A., Petterson, J. S., & Russell, J. (1993a). Social, cultural, and psychological impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Human Organization, 52(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Petterson, J. S., Russell, J., & Downs, M. A. (1993b). Community patterns of psychiatric disorders after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(10), 1517–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Russell, J., Downs, M. A., & Petterson, J. S. (1992). Ethnic differences in stress, coping and depressive symptoms after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. W. (1979). Evacuation decision-making in natural disasters. Mass Emergencies, 4, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou, J. S. (2009). Katrina as a natech disaster: Toxic contamination and long-term risks for residents of New Orleans. Journal of Applied Social Science, 3(2), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou, J. S., Brunsma, D. L., & Overfelt, D. (2010). Katrina as paradigm shift: Reflections on disaster research in the twenty-first century. In D. L. Brunsma, D. Overfelt, & J. S. Picou (Eds.), The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (2nd ed., pp. 1–21). New York, NY, USA: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou, J. S., & Gill, D. A. (1997). Commercial fishers and stress: Psychological impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In J. S. Picou, D. A. Gill, & M. Cohen (Eds.), The Exxon Valdez disaster: Readings on a modern social problem (pp. 211–236). Dubuque, IA, USA: Kendall-Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou, J. S., & Gill, D. A. (2000). The Exxon Valdez disaster as localized environmental catastrophe: Dissimilarities to risk society theory. In M. J. Cohen (Ed.), Risk in the modern age: Social theory, science and environmental decision-making (pp. 143–170). New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Picou, J. S., & Rosebrook, D. D. (1993). Technological accidents, community class-action litigation, and scientific damage assessment: A case study of court-ordered research. Sociological Spectrum, 13(1), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1981). What is a disaster? An agent specific or an all disaster spectrum approach to socio-behavioral aspects of earthquakes? Disaster Research Center. Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Cleveland, OH. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1992). The case for a generic rather than agent specific approach to disasters. Disaster Research Center. University of Delaware. Unpublished Manuscript. London, England: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (Eds.). (1978). Disasters: Theory and research. London, England: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. A. (2004). Voices of Cordova: Social capital in the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Mississippi State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. A. (2012). Individual stress, collective trauma, and social capital in the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Sociological Inquiry, 82(2), 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. A., & Gill, D. A. (2007). Social capital theory as an integrating framework for technological disaster research. Sociological Spectrum, 27, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. A., & Gill, D. A. (2011). Considering community capitals in disaster recovery and resilience. PERI Scope (Public Entity Risk Institute), 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. A., Gill, D. A., & Farnham, C. (2013). Recreancy revisited: Beliefs about institutional failure following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Society and Natural Resources, 26, 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, M., Downs, M. A., Petterson, J., & Russell, J. (1992). Community impacts resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 6, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Barcott, T. P. (2008). After the disaster: Re-creating community and well-being at Buffalo Creek since the notorious coal mining disaster in 1972. Amherst, NY, USA: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, P., & Myers, M. F. (1994). Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemical, or radiological materials between 1980-1989: Analysis and recommendations. Risk Analysis, 14(2), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1987). Bhopal: Anatomy of a crisis. New York, NY, USA: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2006). There’s no such thing as a natural disaster. Available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Smith/.

  • Tierney, K. J. (2014). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. A. (1978). Man-made disasters. New York, NY, USA: Crane, Russak & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. A., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1997). Man-made disasters (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenstein, M. (1957). Disaster: A psychological essay. Glencoe, IL, USA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA

    Duane A. Gill

  2. University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

    Liesel A. Ritchie

Authors
  1. Duane A. Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liesel A. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duane A. Gill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York, USA

    Havidán Rodríguez

  2. University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA

    William Donner

  3. Core Faculty, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

    Joseph E. Trainor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gill, D.A., Ritchie, L.A. (2018). Contributions of Technological and Natech Disaster Research to the Social Science Disaster Paradigm. In: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., Trainor, J. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63253-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63254-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation