Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community Innovation and Disasters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disaster Research

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine community innovation. We begin first by conceptualizing community and innovation as they relate to hazard and disaster. We identify the difficulties inherent in the terms community, innovation, and community innovation, presenting some working concepts that seem to align best with overall disaster research experience. We examine the characteristics of communities that make innovation both necessary and difficult, using examples of innovations drawn from the United States and internationally. This discussion will point toward some directions for future research, including an understanding of community that might be suitable for newer, complex, and diffuse hazards – such as bioterrorism, cyberterrorism, and slow onset hazards related to climate change. The discussion will also point to some needed reorientations in policy that might proceed from either subsequent or existing research.

I’ll be happy to give you innovative thinking. What are the guidelines?

Cullum (2005)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguirre, B. E., Dynes, R. R., Kendra, J. M. & Connell, R. (2005). Institutional resilience and disaster planning for new hazards: Insights from hospitals. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(2) ISSN (Online) 1547–7355, https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1113.

  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2009). Sustainability 3.0. building tomorrow’s earth-friendly communities. Planning, 75(5), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigoness, W. J., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1981). A conceptual paradigm and approach for the study of innovators. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouillettee, J. R., & Quarantelli, E. L. (1971). Types of patterned variation in bureaucratic adaptations to organizational stress. Sociological Inquiry, 41, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., et al. (2003). Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckle, P. (1999). Re-defining community and vulnerability in the context of emergency management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Terry. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’ disasters. In A. Varley (Ed.), Development and environment (pp. 13–30). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillo, P. (2005). Fostering market knowledge use in innovation: The role of internal brokers. European Management Journal, 23, 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L. K. (1999). Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response. Pittsburgh: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. S., & Perry, K. M. E. (2011). Like a fish out of water: Reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullum, L. (2005). The New Yorker, October 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (2001). American hazardscapes: The regionalization of hazards and disasters. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2004). Organization theory and design (8th ed.). Mason: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, E., & Enarson, E. P. (2012). The women of Katrina: How gender, race, and class matter in an American disaster. Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, S. E. (2016). When environmental justice meets social justice: The case of maternal and infant vulnerability after the nepal earthquake. SCRA community mini-grant spotlight. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 7(3). Retrieved at http://www.gjcpp.org/en/resource.php?issue=23&resource=207 on June 12, 2017.

  • DeYoung, S., & Peters, M. (2016). My community, my preparedness: The role of sense of place, community, and confidence in government in disaster readiness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 34(2), 250–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake, S., Prince, M., Sumathipala, A., Siribaddana, S., & Morgan, C. (2013). “We lost all we had in a second”: Coping with grief and loss after a natural disaster. World Psychiatry, 12(1), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (2012). Earthquake disasters and resilience in the global north: Lessons from New Zealand and Japan. The Geographical Journal, 178(3), 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2006). Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research, 35, 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2005). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. C Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C. E. (1961). Disaster. In R. K. Merton & R. A Nisbet (Eds.). Contemporary social problems. An introduction to the sociology of deviant behavior and social disorganization (pp. 651–694) Riverside: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. F. (1991). Coordinating community resources. In T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 55–78). Washington: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D. (1991). Disaster mitigation and hazard management. In T. E. Drabek & G. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 131–160). Washington: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, M. L., & Schroedel, J. R. (2000). Policy diffusion and strategies for promoting policy change: Evidence from California local gun control ordinances. Policy Studies Journal, 28(4), 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, R. C., Hohenemser, C., & Kates, R. W. (1978). Our hazardous environment. Environment, 20(6–15), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1983). Interpretations of calamity. Winchester: Allen and Unwin. Institute for Community Innovation. (ND). Website. Global Entrepreneurship Center. Florida International University, Miami. http://www.entrepreneurship.fiu.edu/community_innovation.htm. Last accessed October 11, 2005.

  • Kelly, J. G. (2006). Becoming ecological: An expedition into community psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003a). Elements of community resilience in the world trade center attack. Disasters, 27(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J. M. & Wachtendorf, T. (2003b). Creativity in emergency response after the World Trade Center attack. In Beyond September 11th: An Account of Post-Disaster Research. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Public Entity Risk Institute, and Institute for Civil Infrastructure Systems. Special Publication No. 39. (pp. 121–146). Boulder: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J. & Wachtendorf, T. (2004). Creativity and coordination in disaster response. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop for Comparative Study on Urban Earthquake Disaster Management, January 29–30, Kobe, Japan (pp. 73–86).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J., & Wachtendorf, T. (2016). American Dunkirk: The waterborne evacuation of Manhattan on 9/11. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra, J. M., Wachtendorf, T., & Quarantelli, E. L. (2003). The evacuation of lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: An unplanned “success.” Forum article. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 29(6) 316–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (1997). Computing and public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, G. A., & Bosworth, S. L. (1994). Organizing, role enactment and disaster: A structural theory. Newark, Toronto, and London: University of Delaware and Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laraway, A. S., & Jennings, C. P. (2002). Health insurance flexibility and accountability demonstration initiative (HIFA): A policy analysis using Kingdon’s policy streams model. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 3(4), 358–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. C. (2008). The 512 Wenchuan earthquake of China - a preliminary report. Retrieved on June 20, 2010. http://mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Reconnaissance/China5-12-08/default.asp.

  • Lee, D. C., Smith, S. W., McStay, C. M., Portelli, I., Goldfrank, L. R., Husk, G., et al. (2014). Rebuilding emergency care after Hurricane Sandy. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 8(02), 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, D., & Lawn, M. (1993). The driving and restraining forces which affect technological innovations in organizations. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 4, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. (2001). Community innovation in hazardous materials management: Profess in implementing SARA Title III in the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B., Picou, J., & Gill, D. (2003). Terrorism as disaster: Selected commonalities and long-term recovery for 9/11 survivors. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 11, 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, N., & Islam, T. (2006). Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation–A 25-year review. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 519–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. K. (1990). Human dimensions of environmental hazards: Complexity, disparity, and the search for guidance. In Nothing to fear: Risk and hazards in American Society, Andrew Kirby (Ed.) (pp. 131–175). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. K. (2004). Re-conceiving recovery. In Keynote Address to the Recovery Symposium, Napier, New Zealand, July 12–13, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2007). Ready or not: Taking innovation in the public sector seriously. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. (1997). Reconsidering the phases of disasters. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(2), 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., & Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paci-Green, R., & Pandey, B. (2016). School construction as catalysts for community change: Evidence from safer school construction projects in Nepal. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 34(3), 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., Mark, G., Martin, J., Sicker, D., Palmer, M., & Grunwald, D. (2010). A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science Conference (p. 8). British Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. (2002). Community schools in community development: Democracy, education, and social change. Ph.D. Dissertation. New Brunswick: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (Eds.). (2000). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters. Miami: Florida International University, International Hurricane Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penta, S., DeYoung, S. E., Yoder-Bontrager, D., & Suji, M. (2016). Trauma, victims, time, changing organizations and the Nepal 2015 earthquake. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 34(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. (1991). Managing disaster response operations. In T. E. Drabek & G. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 201–223). Washington: International City Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, R. H. (1996). Land use and society: Geography, law, and public policy. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, R. H. (1999). Disasters and democracy: The politics of extreme natural events. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1980). The study of disaster movies: Research problems, findings, and implications. Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper 64. Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. (1967). The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation. The Journal of Marketing, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberger, E. (1998). Discourse and practice in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. C. (2010). Integrating hazard mitigation into other local plans. APA Planning Advisory Service Reports, 560, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale-Feldman, A., & Upadahaya, N. (2015). Mental health after the earthquake: Building Nepal’s mental health system in times of emergency. Cultural anthropology. Retrieved from http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/736-mental-health-after-the-earthquake-building-nepalmental-health-system-in-times-of-emergency.

  • Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. M., Kruse, J. B., & Smith, D. A. (2002). Valuing mitigation: Real estate market response to hurricane loss reduction measures. Southern Economic Journal, 660–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. M., & Sutter, D. (2011). Economic and societal impacts of tornadoes. Boston: American Meteorological Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soden, R., & Palen, L. (2014). From crowdsourced mapping to community mapping: The post-earthquake work of openstreetmap Haiti. In COOP 2014-Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, May 27–30, 2014, Nice (France) (pp. 311–326). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern SARE and SRDC. (2005). Request for proposals 2005. Sustainable Community Innovation Grants. Southern SARE Program and Southern Rural Development Center. www.griffin.uga.edu/sare/currentcalls/sci.doc. Last accessed October 16, 2005.

  • Thomas, D. S. K., Cutter, S. L., Hodgson, M. E., Gutekunst, M., & Jones, S. (2003). Use of spatial data and geographic technologies in response to the September 11 terrorist attack on the world trade center. In Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research (pp. 147–164), Special Publication No. 39. Boulder: University of Colorado, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. J. (2002). Lessons learned from research on group and organizational responses to disasters. Paper presented at countering terrorism: Lessons learned from natural and technological disasters. Academy of Sciences (February 28–March 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veness, A. (1993). Neither homed nor homeless: Contested definitions and the personal worlds of the poor. Political Geography, 12(4), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verchick, R. R. M. (2010). Facing catastrophe: Environmental action for a post-Katrina world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtendorf, T. (2004). Improvising 9/11: Organizational improvisation following the World Trade Center disaster. Dissertation #35. Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtendorf, T., & Kendra, J. M. (2005). A typology of organizational response to disasters, Presentation to the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA. August 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtendorf, T., Connell, R., & Tierney, K. J. with assistance from Kompanik, K. (2002). Disaster resistant communities initiative: Assessment of the pilot phase–year 3 (Final Report #39). Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. R. (1998). Role enactment in disaster: Reconciling structuralist and interactionist conceptions of role (Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware). Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5) 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F. (1973). Natural hazards research. In R. J. Chorley (Ed.) Directions in geography (pp. 193–216). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2003). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbers, J., Boersma, K., Ferguson, J., Groenewegen. P., & Mulder, F. (In Press). Two faces of disaster response: Transcending the dichotomy of control and collaboration during the Nepal earthquake relief operation. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters: Nepal Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard W., Sawyer, John E., & Griffin, Ricky W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, M. A. (2004). The knowledge brokers: Venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Delaware, Newark, USA

    Tricia Wachtendorf & James M. Kendra

  2. University of Georgia, Athens, USA

    Sarah E. DeYoung

Authors
  1. Tricia Wachtendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James M. Kendra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sarah E. DeYoung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tricia Wachtendorf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, New York, USA

    Havidán Rodríguez

  2. University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA

    William Donner

  3. Core Faculty, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

    Joseph E. Trainor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wachtendorf, T., Kendra, J.M., DeYoung, S.E. (2018). Community Innovation and Disasters. In: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., Trainor, J. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63253-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63254-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation