Abstract
With regard to the design of research protocols, the field of disaster studies encounters challenges other fields of inquiry do not routinely face. Following a brief historical outline of the field, the chapter moves on to discuss these challenges, which often appear in the context of quick-response research and affect a range of planning and design issues, including, but not limited to, human subjects planning, sample design, measurement, and analysis. In addition to methodological issues in the field, the chapter also discusses advances in statistical analysis and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) that offer means to address common sampling and measurement issues in disaster research. Finally, a section on interdisciplinary research offers a description of multidisciplinary approaches to answering scientific questions, noting both the advantages and potential problems of collaboration across the disciplines. The chapter closes with a description of future trends and issues that may become relevant within the coming decades.
This manuscript owes a great debt to and draws significant inspiration from Robert Stalling’s chapter in the first edition of this volume, as well as his wide collection of writings outlining, critiquing, and synthesizing the various methodologies that have come to define the empirical foundations of the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babbie, E. (2014). The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Barron Ausbrooks, C. Y., Barrett, E. J., & Martinez-Cosio, M. (2009). Ethical issues in disaster research: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Population Research and Policy Review, 28(1), 93–106.
Barton, A. H. (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company Inc.
Baumgart, L., Bass, E. J., Philips, B., & Kloesel, K. (2008). Emergency management decision making during severe weather. Weather and Forecasting, 23, 1268–1279.
Browne, K., & Peek, L. (2014). Beyond the IRB: An ethical toolkit for long-term disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters., 32(1), 82–120.
Bourque, L., Shoaf, K., & Nguyen, L. (1997). Survey research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(1), 71–101.
Borden, K., & Cutter, S. L. (2008). Spatial patterns of natural hazard mortality in the United States. International Journal of Health Geographics., 7, 64.
Collogan, L. K., Tuma, F., Dolan-Sewell, R., Borja, S., & Fleischman, A. R. (2004). Ethical issues pertaining to research in the aftermath of disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(5), 363–372.
Cappock, J. T. (1995). GIS and natural hazards: An overview from a GIS perspective. In A. Carrara & F. Guzzetti (Eds.), Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards (pp. 21–34). Kluwer: Dordrecht.
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (2004). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (p. 2). Washington: National Academy Press, National Academies.
Cutter, S., Boruff, B., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
Dash, N. (1997). The use of geographical information systems in disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(1), 135–146.
Donner, W. (2007). The political ecology of disaster: An analysis of factors influencing U.S. tornado fatalities and injuries, 1998–2000. Demography, 44(3), 669–685.
Donner, W., Rodriguez, H., & Diaz, W. (2012). Tornado warnings in three southern states. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(2), 1–19.
Domino, S., Smith, Y., & Johnson, T. (2007). Opportunities and challenges of interdisciplinary research career development: Implementation of a women’s health research training program. Journal of Women’s Health, 16(2), 256–261.
Dynes, R. (2000). The dialogue between Voltaire and Rousseau in the Lisbon earthquake: The emergence of a social science view. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18(1), 97–115.
Dynes, R. (1970). Organized behavior in disasters. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Drabek, T. (2012). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. NY: Springer.
Drabek, T. (1968). Disaster in aisle 13. College of Administrative Science. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of Buffalo Creek. NY: Simon & Schuster.
Feinberg, W., & Johnson, N. (2010). FIRESCAP: A computer simulation model of reaction to a fire alarm. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20(2–3), 247–269.
Fekete, A. (2012). Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: Challenges in their quality and acceptance. Natural Hazards, 61(3), 1161–1178.
Fekete A. (2010). Assessment of social vulnerability to river-floods in Germany. Graduate Series (4). United Nations University—Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Bonn.
Ferreira, R., Buttell, F., & Ferreira, S. (2015). Ethical considerations for conducting disaster research with vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 12(1), 29–40.
Fischer, H. (2008). Response to disaster: Fact versus fiction and its perpetuation (3rd ed.) University Press of America.
Fischer, H., & Drain, E. (1993). Local offices of emergency preparedness (LEMA) belief in disaster mythology: What has changed and why? The International Journal of Disaster Prevention and Management, 2(3), 58–69.
Fritz, C., & Marks, E. (1954). The NORC studies of human behavior in disaster. The Journal of Social Issues, 10(3), 26–41.
Fritz, C. E. (1961). Disasters. In R. K. Merton & R. A. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). New York: Harcourt.
Fothergill, A., Maestas, E., & Darlington, J. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), 156–173.
Gentile, G. (2000). How effective is strategic bombing?. NY: NYU Press.
Goodchild, M., & Glennon, A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.
Greene, R. W. (2002). Confronting catastrophe: A GIS handbook. New York, NY: ESRI Press.
Kelman, I. (2005). Operational ethics for disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 23(3), 141–158.
Knack, J., Chen, Z., Williams, K., & Jensen-Campbell, L. (2006). Opportunities and challenges for studying disaster survivors. Analysis of Social Issues and Social Policy, 6(1), 175–189.
Kuligowski, E., & Gwynne, S. (2008). The need for behavioral theory in evacuation modeling. In W. W. F. Klingsch, C. Rogsch, A. Schadschneider, & M. Schreckenberg (Eds.), Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics (pp. 721–732). NY: Springer.
Kyne, D. (2015). Managing nuclear power plant inducted disasters. Journal of Emergency Management, 13(5), 417–430.
Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s emergency operations centre. Disasters, 27(1), 37–53.
King, G., & Nielson, R. (2016). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching (Unpublished manuscript). Harvard University. Accessed on June 19, 2017.
Lach, D. (2014). Challenges of interdisciplinary research: reconciling qualitative and quantitative methods for understanding human-landscape systems. Environmental Management, 53(1), 88–93.
Lavin, R. P., Schemmel-Rettenmeier, L., & Frommelt-Kuhle, M. (2012). Conducting research during disasters. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 30(1), 1–19.
Laituri, M., & Kodrich, K. (2008). Online disaster response community: People as sensors of high magnitude disasters using GIS. Sensors, 8(5), 3037–3055.
Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (1992). Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Bristol, PA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Lin, H. (2014). Governing natural disasters: State capacity, democracy, and human vulnerability. Social Forces, 93(3), 1267–1300.
Lowe, S., Sampson, L., Gruebner, O., & Galea, S. (2015). Psychological resilience after hurricane sandy: The influence of individual- and community-level factors on mental health after a large-scale natural disaster. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–15.
Mileti, D. S., & Sorensen, J. H. (1990). Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2011). Rebuilding the mosaic. Washington, DC.
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIH-NIMH). (2007). Ethical issues to consider in developing, evaluating, and conducting research post-disaster. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/funding/grant-writing-and-applicationprocess/ethical-issues-to-consider-in-developing-evaluating-and-conducting-research-post-disaster.shtml.
North, C., & Norris, F. (2006). Choosing research methods to match research goals in studies of disaster and terrorism. In F. Norris, S. Galea, M. Friedman, & P. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health in research (pp. 45–61). New York, NY: Guilford.
Norris, F. (2006). Disaster research methods: Past progress and future directions. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(2), 173–184.
O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., & Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260, 566–567.
Perry, R. (2006). What is a disaster. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 1–15). NY: Springer.
Peacock, W., Van Zandt, S., Henry, D., Grover, H., & Highfield, W. (2012). Social vulnerability and Hurricane Ike: Using Social vulnerability mapping to enhance coastal community resilience in Texas. In P. Bedient (Ed.), After Ike: Severe storm prediction, impact, and recovery on the Texas Gulf Coast, (pp. 66–81). College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press.
Phillips, B. (2014). Qualitative disaster research. New York, NY: Oxford.
Phillips, B. (1997). Qualitative methods and disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15(1), 179–195.
Prince, S. H. (1920). Catastrophe and social change. Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1987a). Disaster studies: An analysis of the social historical factors affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters., 5(3), 285–310.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1987b). What should we study? Questions and suggestions for researchers about the concept of disasters. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5(1), 7–32.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1998). Epilogue. In What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question (pp. 234–273). London and NY: Routledge.
Ruben, D., Hackett, J.; Bezhad, L., Gross, A., & Lanier, G. (2011). Social science research in action. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center (NORC), University of Chicago.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306(5704), 2046.
Rodriguez, H., Diaz, W., Donner, W., Santos, J., & Marks, D. (2005). Allocation of radar resources and policy implications: The end-user community in Oklahoma. ERC-CASA End-User Integration Research Brief No. 3, Disaster Research Center, Newark, DE.
SAMSHA. (2016). Disaster technical assistance center supplemental research bulletin: Challenges and considerations in disaster research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
Scanlon, T. J. (2002). Rewriting a living legend: Researching the 1917 Halifax explosion. In R. A. Stallings (Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 266–301). Philadelphia: Xlibris.
Stallings, R. (2007). Methodological issues. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 55–82). NY: Springer.
Stallings, R. (1997). Sociological theories and disaster studies. Inaugural Distinguished Lecture on Risk and Disaster, University of Delaware, Department of Sociology, Disaster Research Center, April 1997.
Stallings, R. (1990). Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Social Problems, 37(1), 501–516.
Scanlon, J. (1988). Disaster’s little known pioneer: Canada’s Samuel Henry prince. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster, 6(3), 213–232.
Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longintudinal analysis. Don Mills, ON: Oxford.
Spielvogel, J. (2012). Western civilization (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Thomas, D., Etugay, K., & Kemec, S. (2007). The role of geographic information systems/remote sensing in disaster management. In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 83–96). NY: Springer.
Thomas, D. S. K. (2001). Data, data everywhere, but can we really use them? In S. L. Cutter (Ed.), American hazardscapes. Washington, D.C: Joseph Henry Press.
Turner, R., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tierney, K., Christine, B., & Erica, K. (2006). Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy, 604(1), 57–81.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donner, W., Diaz, W. (2018). Methodological Issues in Disaster Research. In: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., Trainor, J. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63253-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63254-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)