Skip to main content

Outcomes Assessment and Registries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Abdominal Hernias

Abstract

What is the outcome of an abdominal wall hernia repair and how can it be measured?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16(3):239–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012. Hernia. 2013;17(4):423–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16(3):261–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen KK, Henriksen N, Harling H. Standardized measurement of quality of life after incisional hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2014;208(3):485–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loos MJA, Houterman S, MRM S, Roumen RMH. Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: visual analogue or verbal rating scale? Hernia. 2008;12(2):147–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon J, Preshaw RM, Hagen N. Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg. 1996;224(5):598–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):638–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB. Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg. 2011;254(5):709–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christoffersen MW, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN, Bytzer P, Bisgaard T. Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1852–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fränneby U, Gunnarsson U, Andersson M, Heuman R, Nordin P, Nyrén O, et al. Validation of an inguinal pain questionnaire for assessment of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2008;95(4):488–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clay L, Fränneby U, Sandblom G, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K. Validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of pain following ventral hernia repair--the VHPQ. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2012;397(8):1219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip™ laparoscopic self-fixating mesh according to the EuraHS-QoL instrument. Surgery. 2016;160(5):1344–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flum D, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Shumpelick V. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg. 2002;73(5):474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alnassar S, Bawahab M, Abdoh A, Guzman R, Al Tuwaijiri T, Louridas G. Incisional hernia postrepair of abdominal aortic occlusive and aneurysmal disease: five-year incidence. Vascular. 2012;20(5):273–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN, Knebel P, Bruckner T, Ulrich A, et al. Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2013;101(2):51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European hernia society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. den Hartog D, Dur AHM, Kamphuis AGA, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(1):45–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pereira A, Pera M, Grande L. Elevada incidencia de hernia incisional tras reseccion abierta y laparoscopica por cancer colorrectal. Cir Esp. 2013;1:5–10. (Spanish language).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Claes K, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D, et al. Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after colorectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scan. Hernia. 2014;18(6):797–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinand Köckerling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Köckerling, F., Kyle-Leinhase, I., Muysoms, F.E. (2018). Outcomes Assessment and Registries. In: LeBlanc, K., Kingsnorth, A., Sanders, D. (eds) Management of Abdominal Hernias. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63251-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63251-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63250-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63251-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics