Skip to main content

European Educational Systems and Assessment Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Transforming Assessment

Abstract

This chapter surveys the status of educational systems and assessment practices across eight European countries that are part of the ASSIST-ME project. First, variations in the country’s educational systems are examined to identify possible connections between systems and educational practices. Such associations are useful both for understanding different existing assessment conditions as well as for providing possible pathways for change. Next, the chapter takes a closer look at teacher practices in these educational systems in order to identify the actual assessment practices of teachers in each country. With these understandings of the systems and current uses of assessment, it is possible to identify affordances and challenges for improving assessment practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM - Part I. (ASSIST-ME Report Series No. 1). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. S. (2004): Integreret Evaluering – En undersøgelse af den fagligt evaluerende lærer-elevsamtale som evalueringsredskab i Gymnasial Undervisning. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Denmark. Retrieved from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Om_SDU/Fakulteterne/Humaniora/Phd/afhandlinger/2005/Afhandlinger%2042_spanget%20pdf.pdf

  • Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D., & Lepareur, C. (2015). PCK at stake in teacher–student interaction in relation to students’ difficulties. In Understanding science teachers’ professional knowledge growth (pp. 47–61). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dolin, J. (2002). Fysikfaget i forandring – læring og undervisning i fysik i gymnasiet med fokus på dialogiske processer, autenticitet og kompetenceudvikling. PhD Dissertation, Roskilde University. Retrieved from http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/1645

  • Grangeat, M., & Hudson, B. (2015). 12. A new model for understanding the growth of science teacher professional knowledge. Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Institutional structures of the education system and student achievement: A review of Cross-country economic research. In Educational Policy Evaluation through International Comparative Assessments (pp. 145–175). New York: Waxmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C. (2013). Collaborative action research as a tool for generating formative feedback on teachers’ classroom assessment practice: The KREST project. Teachers and Teaching, 19(2), 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issaieva, É., Pini, G., & Crahay, M. (2011). Positionnements des enseignants et des élèves du primaire face à l'évaluation: une convergence existe-t-elle? Revue française de pédagogie, 3, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jundt, W., & Wälti, B. (2011). Mathematische Beurteilungsumgebungen; 7. Schuljahr. Zug: Klett und Schulverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A., Harks, B., Blum, W., Leiß, D., & Rakoczy, K. (2010). Leistungsbeurteilung und Kompetenzmodellierung im Mathematikunterricht. Projekt Co2CA (pp. 64–74).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepareur, C. (2016). L’évaluation dans les enseignements scientifiques fondés sur l’investigation: Effets de différentes modalités d’évaluation formative sur l’autorégulation des apprentissages. Thèse de doctorat. Université Grenoble Alpes. France

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis (Vol. 163). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, L., Cross, D., Nakhili, N., Grangeat, M., & Bressoux, P. (2013). Educational system factors influencing student assessment methods in science, technology and mathematics education (Delivrable 3.4). Report for the FP7 UE project Assess Inquiry in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education -ASSIST-ME. http://assistme.ku.dk/deliverables/wp3/Deliverable_3.4_-_Part_1.pdf

  • Lima, L., Cross, D., Grangeat, M., & Nakhili, N. (2015, January). Évaluation Formative dans l’enseignement des sciences et mathématiques dans 8 pays européens: résultats de la première étape du projet ASSIST-ME. In Conditions enseignantes, conditions pour enseigner: réalités, enjeux, défis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B., & Jane Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(02), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Education policy outlook. Germany: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/edu/EDUCATION%20POLICY%20OUTLOOK%20GERMANY_EN.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Santiago, P., & Source OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students' perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). National reports of partner countries reviewing research on formative and summative assessment in their countries, No. D 2.3. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, E. (2012). Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies, 38(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, R. (2009). Die formative Beurteilung und ihr Nutzen für die Entwicklung von Lernkompetenz: eine empirische Studie in der Sekundarstufe I. Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vögeli-Mantovani, U. (1999). Mehr fördern, weniger auslesen. Zur Entwicklung der schulischen Beurteilung in der Schweiz. Trendbericht SKBF, (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know. Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Chapter 6: Teacher learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary Professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 173–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, F. (2007). Fragen der Leistungsbewertung beim Lerntagebuch und Portfolio. Lernprozesse dokumentieren, reflektieren und beurteilen. Lerntagebuch und Portfolio in Bildungsforschung und Bildungspraxis (pp. 109–129).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Evans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, R. et al. (2018). European Educational Systems and Assessment Practice. In: Dolin, J., Evans, R. (eds) Transforming Assessment. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63247-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63248-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics