Abstract
This chapter surveys the status of educational systems and assessment practices across eight European countries that are part of the ASSIST-ME project. First, variations in the country’s educational systems are examined to identify possible connections between systems and educational practices. Such associations are useful both for understanding different existing assessment conditions as well as for providing possible pathways for change. Next, the chapter takes a closer look at teacher practices in these educational systems in order to identify the actual assessment practices of teachers in each country. With these understandings of the systems and current uses of assessment, it is possible to identify affordances and challenges for improving assessment practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernholt, S., Rönnebeck, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). Report on current state of the art in formative and summative assessment in IBE in STM - Part I. (ASSIST-ME Report Series No. 1). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 215–232.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451–469.
Christensen, T. S. (2004): Integreret Evaluering – En undersøgelse af den fagligt evaluerende lærer-elevsamtale som evalueringsredskab i Gymnasial Undervisning. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Denmark. Retrieved from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Om_SDU/Fakulteterne/Humaniora/Phd/afhandlinger/2005/Afhandlinger%2042_spanget%20pdf.pdf
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
Creemers, B. P., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: The importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 347–366.
Cross, D., & Lepareur, C. (2015). PCK at stake in teacher–student interaction in relation to students’ difficulties. In Understanding science teachers’ professional knowledge growth (pp. 47–61). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dolin, J. (2002). Fysikfaget i forandring – læring og undervisning i fysik i gymnasiet med fokus på dialogiske processer, autenticitet og kompetenceudvikling. PhD Dissertation, Roskilde University. Retrieved from http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/1645
Grangeat, M., & Hudson, B. (2015). 12. A new model for understanding the growth of science teacher professional knowledge. Understanding Science Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Growth, 205.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Institutional structures of the education system and student achievement: A review of Cross-country economic research. In Educational Policy Evaluation through International Comparative Assessments (pp. 145–175). New York: Waxmann Verlag.
Harrison, C. (2013). Collaborative action research as a tool for generating formative feedback on teachers’ classroom assessment practice: The KREST project. Teachers and Teaching, 19(2), 202–213.
Issaieva, É., Pini, G., & Crahay, M. (2011). Positionnements des enseignants et des élèves du primaire face à l'évaluation: une convergence existe-t-elle? Revue française de pédagogie, 3, 5–26.
Jundt, W., & Wälti, B. (2011). Mathematische Beurteilungsumgebungen; 7. Schuljahr. Zug: Klett und Schulverlag.
Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A., Harks, B., Blum, W., Leiß, D., & Rakoczy, K. (2010). Leistungsbeurteilung und Kompetenzmodellierung im Mathematikunterricht. Projekt Co2CA (pp. 64–74).
Lepareur, C. (2016). L’évaluation dans les enseignements scientifiques fondés sur l’investigation: Effets de différentes modalités d’évaluation formative sur l’autorégulation des apprentissages. Thèse de doctorat. Université Grenoble Alpes. France
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis (Vol. 163). Los Angeles: Sage.
Lima, L., Cross, D., Nakhili, N., Grangeat, M., & Bressoux, P. (2013). Educational system factors influencing student assessment methods in science, technology and mathematics education (Delivrable 3.4). Report for the FP7 UE project Assess Inquiry in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education -ASSIST-ME. http://assistme.ku.dk/deliverables/wp3/Deliverable_3.4_-_Part_1.pdf
Lima, L., Cross, D., Grangeat, M., & Nakhili, N. (2015, January). Évaluation Formative dans l’enseignement des sciences et mathématiques dans 8 pays européens: résultats de la première étape du projet ASSIST-ME. In Conditions enseignantes, conditions pour enseigner: réalités, enjeux, défis.
Marshall, B., & Jane Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(02), 133–149.
OECD. (2013). Education policy outlook. Germany: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/edu/EDUCATION%20POLICY%20OUTLOOK%20GERMANY_EN.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Santiago, P., & Source OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students' perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., Ropohl, M., Köller, O., & Parchmann, I. (2013). National reports of partner countries reviewing research on formative and summative assessment in their countries, No. D 2.3. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Sach, E. (2012). Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies, 38(3), 261–276.
Smit, R. (2009). Die formative Beurteilung und ihr Nutzen für die Entwicklung von Lernkompetenz: eine empirische Studie in der Sekundarstufe I. Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.
Vögeli-Mantovani, U. (1999). Mehr fördern, weniger auslesen. Zur Entwicklung der schulischen Beurteilung in der Schweiz. Trendbericht SKBF, (3).
Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know. Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning, 1–19.
Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Chapter 6: Teacher learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary Professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 173–209.
Winter, F. (2007). Fragen der Leistungsbewertung beim Lerntagebuch und Portfolio. Lernprozesse dokumentieren, reflektieren und beurteilen. Lerntagebuch und Portfolio in Bildungsforschung und Bildungspraxis (pp. 109–129).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, R. et al. (2018). European Educational Systems and Assessment Practice. In: Dolin, J., Evans, R. (eds) Transforming Assessment. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63247-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63248-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)