Skip to main content

Life Cycle Assessment of the Romanian Electricity Mix: Impacts, Trends and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Nearly Zero Energy Communities (CSE 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Energy ((SPE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1202 Accesses

Abstract

Considering the recent pressures in the energy sector at global level, in close relation with the conventional fuel availability, climate change, public interest and the overall debate for more sustainable energy sources, there is an acute need for instruments, capable to identify and measure in a coherent framework how various changes in the energetic systems lead to progress/challenges, in terms of environmental impacts and sustainability. In this context, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standardized methodology, capable of analysing complex systems, as well as to identify and quantify various environmental impacts of products for their entire life cycles. The main objectives of this study are to perform a life cycle evaluation of the Romanian energy sector for electricity production, in order to identify, quantify and update the associated environmental impacts and to investigate the sustainability of future scenarios. The LCA is focused onto 1 kWh of electricity produced in Romania, considering the indigenous resources mix: coal and gas-fired power plants, hydropower, wind turbines, nuclear power, solar panels and biomass, as well as imports and exports. The assessment is based on the ReCiPe impact assessment methodology, which enables the use of 18 environmental impact categories. By applying the LCA methodology, the Romanian energy mix environmental impact profiles can be compared for 4 years: 1990 (reference year), 1997, 2010 and 2015. Furthermore, the 2030 and 2050 scenarios were analysed. The results show how the changes in the electricity production mix have positive changes in the environmental profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. www.wc.europe.eu/eurostat

  2. Farfan, F.J., Breyer, C.: Structural changes of global power generation capacity towards sustainability and the risk of stranded investments supported by a sustainability indicator. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 370–384 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.068

  3. Hondo, H.: Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 30, 2024–2056 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2004.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannan, R., Leong, K.C., Osman, R., Ho, H.K.: Life cycle Energy, emissions and cost inventory of power generation technologies in Singapore. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 702–715 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foidart, F., Oliver-Solá, J., Gasol, C.M., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J.: How important are current energy mix choices on future sustainability? Case study: Belgium and Spain projections towards 2020–2030. Energy Policy 38, 5028–5037 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santoyo-Castelazo, E., Gujba, H., Azapagic, A.: Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico. Energy 36, 1488–1499 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gujba, H., Mulugetta, Y., Azapagic, A.: Power generation scenarios for Nigeria: an environmental and cost assessment. Energy Policy 39, 968–980 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stamford, L., Azapagic, A.: Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK. Int. J. Energy Res. 36(14), 1263–1290 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.2962

  9. Santoyo-Castelazzo, E., Azapagic, A.: Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J. Clean. Prod. 80, 119–138 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061

  10. Stamford, L., Azapagic, A.: Life cycle sustainability assessment of UK electricity scenarios to 2070. Energy Sustain. Dev. 23, 194–211 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.09.008

  11. Brizmohun, R., Ramjeawon, T., Azapagic, A.: Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mauritius. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 565–575 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.033

  12. Treyer, K., Bauer, C.: The environmental footprint of UAE’s electricity sector: combining life cycle assessment and scenario modeling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55, 1234–1247 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.016

  13. Atilgan, B., Azapagic, A.: Renewable electricity in Turkey: life cycle environmental impacts. Renew. Energy, 89, 649–657 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.082

  14. Nanaki, A.E., Koroneos, C.J, Xydis, G.A.: Environmental impact assessment of electricity production from lignite. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy (2016, in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep

  15. Martin-Gamboa, M., Iribarren, D., García-Gusano, D., Dufour, J.: A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems. J. Clean. Prod. 150, 164–174 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.017

  16. Santos, M.J., Ferreira, P., Araújo, M., Portugal-Pereira J., Lucena, A.F.P., Schaeffer, R.: Scenarios for the future Brazilian power sector based on a multicriteria assessment. J. Clean. Prod. (2017, in press), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.145

  17. Teotónio, C., Fortes, P., Roebeling, P., Rodriguez, M., Robaina-Alves, M.: Assessing the impacts of climate change on hydropower generation and the power sector in Portugal: a partial equilibrium approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 74, 788–799 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.002

  18. Kostevsek, A., Klemes, J.J., Varbanov, P.S., Cucek, L., Petek, J.: Sustainability assessment of the Locally Integrated Energy Sectors for a Slovenian municipality. J. Clean. Prod. 88, 83–89 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.008

  19. Ding, N., Liu, J., Yang, J., Yang, D.: Comparative life cycle assessment of regional electricity supplies in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 119, 47–59 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.010

  20. Zhang, X., Bauer, C., Mutel, C.L., Volkart, K.: Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas: approaches, system variations and their environmental implications. Appl. Energy, 190, 326–338 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098

  21. Romanian Energy Strategy 2016–2030, with an outlook to 2050

    Google Scholar 

  22. Romanian Energy Strategy for 2007–2020, revised for 2011–2020

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.nuclearelectrica.ro/cne/

  24. Dragomir, G., Șerban, A., Năstase, G., Brezeanu, A.I.: Wind energy in Romania: a review from 2009 to 2016. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 64, 129–143 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.080

  25. Colesca, S.E., Ciocoiu, C.N.: An overview of the Romanian renewable energy sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24, 149–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.042

  26. Romanian Photovoltaic Industry Report (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. http://www.iea-pvps.org/index.php?id=32. International Energy Agency - Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme, 30 March 2015, 15

  28. http://www.iea.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Teodosiu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barjoveanu, G., Teodosiu, C., Cailean (Gavrilescu), D. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment of the Romanian Electricity Mix: Impacts, Trends and Challenges. In: Visa, I., Duta, A. (eds) Nearly Zero Energy Communities. CSE 2017. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63215-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63215-5_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63214-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63215-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics