Can Digital Games Help Seniors Improve Their Quality of Life?

  • Louise SauvéEmail author
  • Lise Renaud
  • David Kaufman
  • Emmanuel Duplàa
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 739)


This developmental research study aimed to design, implement and evaluate an online educational game to improve the quality of life for seniors aged 55 years and older. The game Live Well, Live Healthy! ( is a Bingo game in which the learning content in the study is integrated into the mechanism of the game. A “pre-test/post-test” single group methodology measured the impact of the game on three dimensions of quality of life: psychological, physical, and social. A total of 56 seniors played for a week in multiplayer mode involving real-time interaction with at least two other participants. The results indicated that the educational game improved the seniors’ perception of a majority of the variables concerning the three dimensions: physical (fatigue, sleep, eating habits); social well-being (building ties, social connectedness, friendships) and psychological well-being (depression, difficulty doing activities, mood and feeling of being loved). Some variables (sadness, isolation, proximity to family and physical habits) generated a weak perception of positive benefits for these seniors.


Online games Seniors Benefits Quality of life 



We would like to thank the research assistants involved with this study: Samuel Venière for recruitment and data collection in the field, Aurélie Faticati for the literature review and Gustavo Adolfo Angulo Mendoza for the statistical analysis of the data of the study.

We also thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the AGE-WELL NCE Inc., a member of Canada’s Networks of Centres of Excellence program, for their financial support of this research.


  1. 1.
    Beaudoin, J., Kooli, N., Thomas, F., Arlabosse, B., Couture, A., Danjou, R.: Génération @: Portrait de l’utilisation d’internet et de l’ordinateur par les aînés internautes du Québec: CEFRIO, Québec (2011).
  2. 2.
    Kuyken, W.: WHOQOL group: the world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Soc. Sci. Med. 41(10), 1403–1409 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHOQOL Group: Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 2(2), pp. 153–159 (1993) doi: 10.1007/BF00435734
  4. 4.
    Bowling, A., Dieppe, P.: What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ 331, 1548–1551 (2005). doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, S.C., Huang, Y.G.L., Chiang, I.T.: Using somatosensory video games to promote quality of life for the elderly with disabilities. In: Proceedings, the IEEE 4th International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (Digitel), pp. 258–262. IEEE, Takamatsu (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turcotte, M., Schellenberg, G.: Un portrait des aînés au Canada [A portrait of seniors in Canada] Statistiques Canada, Ottawa (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaz-Orueta, U., Facal, D., Nap, H., Ranga, M.-M.: What is the key for older people to show interest in playing digital learning games? Initial qualitative findings from the LEAGE project on a multicultural European sample. Games Health J. 1(2), 115–123 (2012). doi: 10.1089/g4h.2011.0024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nacke, L.E., Nacke, A., Lindley, C.A.: Brain training for silver gamers: Effects of age and game form on effectiveness, efficiency, self-assessment and gameplay experience. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12(5), 493–499 (2009). doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization: International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva (2001).
  10. 10.
    Figueira, H., Figueira, J., Mello, D., Dantas, E.: Quality of life throughout aging. Acta Medica Lituanica 15, 169–172 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freitas, C.M., Santiago, M.S., Viana, A.T., Leão, A.C., Freyre, C.: Motivational aspects that influence the elderly to enroll on and continue participating in physical exercise programs. Revista Brasileira de Cine-antropometria Desempenho Humano 9(1), 92–100 (2007)
  12. 12.
    Pernambuco, C.S., Rodrigues, B.M., Bezerra, J.C.P., Carrielo, A., de Oliveira Fernandes, A.D., de Souza Vale, R.G., Dantas, E.H.M.: Quality of life, elderly and physical activity. Health 4(2), 88–93 (2012). doi: 10.4236/health.2012.42014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jorgensen, M.G., Laessoe, U., Hendriksen, C., Nielson, O.B.F., Aagaard, P.: Efficacy of Nintendo Wii training on mechanical leg muscle function and postural balance in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68(7), 845–852 (2013). doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maillot, P., Perrot, A., Hartley, A.: Effects of interactive physical-activity video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults. Psychol. Aging 27(3), 589–600 (2012). doi: 10.1037/a0026268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Singh, D.K.A., Rajaratnam, B.S., Palaniswamy, V., Raman, V.P., Bong, P.S., Pearson, H.: Effects of balance-focused interactive games compared to therapeutic balance classes for older women. Climacteric 16(1), 141–146 (2013). doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.664832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bieryla, K.A., Dold, N.M.: Feasibility of Wii Fit training to improve clinical measures of balance in older adults. Clin. Interv. Aging 8, 775–781 (2013). doi: 10.2147/CIA.S46164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daniel, K.: Wii-hab for pre-frail older adults. Rehabil. Nurs. 37(4), 195–201 (2012). doi: 10.1002/rnj.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams, K.B., Liebrandt, S., Moon, H.: A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and well-being in later life. Ageing Soc. 31(4), 683–712 (2011). doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heylin, L.: The older, the lonelier? Risk factors for social loneliness in old age. Ageing Soc. 30(7), 1177–1196 (2010). doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10000292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reichstadt, J., Sengupta, G., Depp, C., Palinkas, L.A., Jeste, D.V.: Older adults’ perspectives on successful aging: Qualitative interviews. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 18(7), 567–575 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Theurer, K., Wister, A.: Altruistic behaviour and social capital as predictors of well-being among older Canadians. Ageing Soc. 30(1), 157–181 (2010). doi: 10.1017/S0144686X09008848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pew Internet and American Life Project: Demographics of Internet users. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC (2011).
  23. 23.
    De Schutter, R., Abeele V.V.: Designing meaningful within the psycho-social context of older adults. In: Abeele, V.V., Zaman, B., Obrist, M., IJsselsteijn, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games, Fun and Games 2010, pp. 84–93. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Schutter, B.: Never too old to play: The appeal of digital games to an older audience. Games Cult. 6(2), 155–170 (2011). doi: 10.1177/1555412010364978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H.H., Kort, Y., Poels, K.: Digital game design for elderly users. In: Kapralos, B., Katchabaw, M., Rajnovich J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, pp. 17–22. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khoo, E., Cheok, A.: Age invaders: Intergenerational mixed reality family game. IJVR 5(2), 45–50 (2006).
  27. 27.
    Khoo, E.T., Merritt, T., Cheok, A.D.: Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Interact. Comput. 21(1–2), 76–87 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahmud, A.A., Mubin, O., Shahid, S., Martens, J.-B.: Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Building Bridges - NordiCHI 2008, pp. 403–406. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stebbins, R.: Serious Leisure: A Perspective for Our Time. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stowe, J.D., Cooney, T.M.: Examining rowe and kahn’s concept of successful aging: Importance of taking a life course perspective. Gerontologist 55(1), 43–50 (2015). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Theng, Y.-L., Chua, P.H., Pham, T.P.: Wii as entertainment and socialisation aids for mental and social health of the elderly. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHIEA 2012, pp. 691–702 (2012). doi: 10.1145/2212776.2212840
  32. 32.
    Whitcomb, G.R.: Computer games for the elderly. In: Rosenberg, R.S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computers and the Quality of Life, CQL 1990, pp. 112–115. ACM, New York (1990). doi: 10.1145/97344.97401
  33. 33.
    Astell, A.J.: Technology and fun for a happy old age. In: Sixsmith, A., Gutman, G. (eds.) Technologies for Active Aging, pp. 169–187. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Allaire, J.C., McLaughlin, A.C., Trujillo, A., Whitlock, L.A., Laporte, L., Gandy, M.: Successful aging through digital games: Socioemotional differences between older adult gamers and non-gamers. Comput. Human Behav. 29(4), 1302–1306 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wollersheim, D., Merkes, M., Shields, N., Liamputtong, P., Wallis, L., Reynolds, F., Koh, L.: Physical and psychosocial effects of Wii video game use among older women. IJETS 8(2), 85–98 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaufman, D., Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Duplàa, E.: Enquête auprès des aînés canadiens sur les bénéfiques que les jeux numériques ou non leur apportent [Survey of Canadian seniors to determine the benefits derived from digital games]. Research report. TÉLUQ, UQAM, Simon Fraser University, University of Ottawa, Québec (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., Duplàa, E.: Validation of the educational game for seniors: “Live Well, Live Healthy!”. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 674–682 (2015). Elsevier Ltd., Chicago (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.526
  38. 38.
    Brand, J.E., Lorentz, P., Mathew, T.: Digital Australia 2014. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association and Bond University, Eveleigh, Australia (2014).
  39. 39.
    Rosenberg, D., Depp, C.A., Vahia, I.V., Reichstadt, J., Palmer, B.W., Kerr, J., Norman, G., Jeste, D.V.: Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 18(3), 221–226 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Venière, S., Mendozo, G.A.: Rapport d’expérimentation du jeu Vivons bien, vivons sainement! [Experimentation report on the game Live Well, Live Healthy]: Télé-université and UQAM, Québec (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seçer, I., Satyen, L.: Video game training and reaction time skills among older adults. Act. Adapt. Aging 38(3), 220–236 (2014). doi: 10.1080/01924788.2014.935908 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Sauvé
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lise Renaud
    • 2
  • David Kaufman
    • 3
  • Emmanuel Duplàa
    • 4
  1. 1.Département ÉducationTélé-Université/SAVIEQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Faculté de CommunicationUQAMMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations