Plant Invasions in the Czech Republic

Part of the Plant and Vegetation book series (PAVE, volume 14)


At present there are 1454 alien taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, hybrids and cultivars) of vascular plants recorded in the Czech Republic, among them 350 archaeophytes, introduced since the beginning of the Neolithic until the end of the Middle Ages, and 1104 neophytes, introduced in the Modern Period. Of the total number, 985 (67.7%) taxa are classified as casual, 408 (28.1%) as naturalized but non-invasive and 61 (4.2%) as invasive. Aliens make up 33.1% of the total plant diversity recorded in this country, or 14.4% of the permanently present flora. The highest levels of invasion of plant communities are recorded in cities and villages and their surroundings, floodplains of large rivers, disturbed landscapes in the north, and agricultural landscapes and forest plantations in the warm lowlands, especially in southern, central and eastern Bohemia. The habitats and vegetation types harbouring the highest percentages of alien species in the Czech Republic are generally those with a high level of disturbance or with a fluctuating input of nutrients.



We thank Jiří Danihelka, Zdeněk Kaplan and Marinus Werger for helpful comments on the manuscript, Ondřej Hájek for preparing the maps, Zdeňka Lososová for a photograph, Kryštof Chytrý for preparing photographic plates, Pavel Dřevojan and Zuzana Sixtová for editing the list of references, Tony Dixon for improving our English and Irena Axmanová for her help with proof correcting. This work was supported by project no. 14-36079G, Centre of Excellence Pladias (Czech Science Foundation), and long-term research development project no. RVO 67985939 (The Czech Academy of Sciences).


  1. Aikio S, Duncan RP, Hulme PE (2010) Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos 119:370–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander JM, Kuffer C, Daehler CC, Edwards PJ, Pauchard A, Seipel T (2011) Assembly of nonnative floras along elevational gradients explained by directional ecological filtering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:656–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balogh L, Dancza I, Király G (2004) A magyarországi neofitonok időszerű jegyzéke, és besorolásuk inváziós szempontból [A recent list of neophytes in Hungary and their classification according to their success]. In: Mihály B, Botta-Dukát Z (eds) Biológiai inváziók Magyarországon: Özönnövények [Biological invasions in Hungary: invasive plants]. Természet BÚVÁR Alapítvány Kiadó, Budapest, pp 61–92Google Scholar
  4. Bastl M, Kočár P, Prach K, Pyšek P (1997) The effect of successional age and disturbance on the establishment of alien plants in man-made sites: an experimental approach. In: Brock JH, Wade M, Pyšek P, Green D (eds) Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 191–201Google Scholar
  5. Becker T, Dietz H, Billeter R, Bush MB, Buschmann H, Edwards PJ (2005) Altitudinal distribution of alien plant species in the Swiss Alps. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 7:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Marková Z, Mrugała A, ... Bacher S (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology 12:e1001850PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV, Banfi E, Bernardo L, Bovio M, Brundu G, Cagiotti MR, Camarda I, ... Blasi C (2009) Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosystems 143:386–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chytrý M (ed) (2007–2013) Vegetace České republiky 1–4 [Vegetation of the Czech Republic 1–4]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  10. Chytrý M, Rafajová M (2003) Czech national phytosociological database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia 75:1–15Google Scholar
  11. Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Tichý L, Knollová I, Danihelka J (2005) Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 77:339–354Google Scholar
  12. Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, Danihelka J (2008a) Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89:1541–1553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chytrý M, Maskell LC, Pino J, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Font X, Smart SM (2008b) Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Wild J, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M (2009a) European map of alien plant invasions, based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Diversity and Distributions 15:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chytrý M, Wild J, Pyšek P, Tichý L, Danihelka J, Knollová I (2009b) Maps of the level of invasion of the Czech Republic by alien plants. Preslia 81:187–207Google Scholar
  16. Chytrý M, Wild J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Dendoncker N, Reginster I, Pino J, Maskell L, Vilà M, ... Settele J (2012) Projecting trends in plant invasions in Europe under different scenarios of future land-use change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P (2015) Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage. AoB Plants 7:plv033PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P (2016) Juvenile biological traits ofImpatiens species are more strongly associated with naturalization in temperate climate than their adult traits. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 20:1–10Google Scholar
  19. Danihelka J (2013) Botanické součty, rozdíly a podíly [Botanical counts]. Živa 61:69–72Google Scholar
  20. Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Kaplan Z (2012) Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:647–811Google Scholar
  21. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. di Castri F (1989) History of biological invasions with special emphasis on the Old World. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  23. Dostál P, Dawson W, van Kleunen M, Keser LH, Fischer M (2013) Central European plant species from more productive habitats are more invasive at a global scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dostálek J, Frantík T, Šilarová V (2016) Changes in the distribution of alien plants along roadsides in relation to adjacent land use over the course of 40 years. Plant Biosystems 150:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Essl F, Rabitsch W (eds) (2002) Neobiota in Österreich. Umweltbundesamt, WienGoogle Scholar
  26. Essl F, Dullinger D, Kleinbauer I (2009) Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences of Ambrosia artemisiifolia during the invasion of Austria. Preslia 81:119–133Google Scholar
  27. Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hülber K, Jarošík V, Kleinbauer I, Krausmann F, Kühn I, ... Pyšek P (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. European Union (2014) Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Official Journal of the European Union L 317:35–55Google Scholar
  29. Genovesi P, Carboneras C, Vilà M, Walton P (2014) EU adopts innovative legislation on invasive species: a step towards a global response to biological invasions? Biological Invasions 17:1307–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hejda M (2013) Do species differ in their ability to coexist with the dominant alien Lupinus polyphyllus? A comparison between two distinct invaded ranges and a native range. NeoBiota 17:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009a) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology 97:393–403Google Scholar
  32. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Jarošík V (2009b) Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hejda M, Chytrý M, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2015) Native-range habitats of invasive plants: are they similar to invaded-range habitats and do they differ according to the geographical direction of invasion? Diversity and Distributions 21:312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hejda M, Štajerová K, Pyšek P (2017) Dominance has a biogeographical component: do plants tend to exert stronger impacts in their invaded rather than native range? Journal of Biogeography 44:18–27Google Scholar
  35. Hejný S, Jehlík V, Kopecký K, Kropáč Z, Lhotská M (1973) Karanténní plevele Československa [Quarantine weeds of Czechoslovakia]. Studie ČSAV 1973(8):1–156Google Scholar
  36. Hejný S, Kopecký K, Jehlík V, Krippelová T (1979) Přehled ruderálních rostlinných společenstev Československa [Survey of ruderal plant communities of Czechoslovakia]. Rozpravy Československé akademie věd, Řada matematických a přírodních věd 89(2):1–100Google Scholar
  37. Hejný S, Slavík B, Chrtek J, Tomšovic P, Kovanda M (eds) (1988) Květena České socialistické republiky 1 [Flora of the Czech Socialist Republic 1]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  38. Hejný S, Slavík B, Hrouda L, Skalický V (eds) (1990) Květena České republiky 2 [Flora of the Czech Republic 2]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  39. Hejný S, Slavík B, Kirschner J, Křísa B (eds) (1992) Květena České republiky 3 [Flora of the Czech Republic 3]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  40. Holub J, Jirásek V (1967) Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 2:69–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horáčková J, Juřičková L, Jarošík V, Šizling A, Pyšek P (2014) Invasiveness does not predict impact: response of native land snail communities to plant invasions in riparian habitats. PLoS One 9:e108296PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Nentwig W, Vilà M (2009) Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324:40–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jandová K, Klinerová T, Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Cajthaml T, Dostál P (2014) Long-term impact of Heracleum mantegazzianum invasion on soil chemical and biological characteristics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 68:270–278Google Scholar
  44. Jehlík V (ed) (1998) Cizí expanzivní plevele České republiky a Slovenské republiky [Alien expansive weeds of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  45. Jehlík V, Hejný S (1974) Main migration routes of adventitious plants in Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 9:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kalníková V (2012) Rozšíření invazních neofytů a sukcese na štěrkových náplavech na tocích Moravskoslezských Beskyd a jejich podhůří [Distribution of invasive neophytes and succession on gravel sediments along streams of the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts and their foothills]. MSc thesis, Masaryk University, BrnoGoogle Scholar
  47. Kalusová V (2009) Rostlinné invaze v aluviálních biotopech dolního toku Moravy a Dyje [Plant invasions in floodplain habitats of the lower Morava nad Dyje Rivers]. MSc thesis, Masaryk University, BrnoGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalusová V, Chytrý M, Kartesz JT, Nishino M, Pyšek P (2013) Where do they come from and where do they go? European habitats as donors of alien plants globally. Diversity and Distributions 19:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kalusová V, Chytrý M, Peet RK, Wentworth TR (2014) Alien species pool influences the level of habitat invasion in intercontinental exchange of alien plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23:1366–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kalusová V, Chytrý M, Peet RK, Wentworth TR (2015) Intercontinental comparison of habitat levels of invasion between temperate North America and Europe. Ecology 96:3363–3373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaplan Z (2012) Flora and phytogeography of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:505–574Google Scholar
  52. Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 15–38Google Scholar
  53. Křivánek M (2006) Biologické invaze a možnosti jejich předpovědi [Biological invasions and possibilities for their prediction]. Acta Průhoniciana 84:5–73Google Scholar
  54. Křivánek M, Pyšek P (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Diversity and Distributions 12:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kubešová M, Moravcová L, Suda J, Jarošík V, Pyšek P (2010) Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82:81–96Google Scholar
  56. Kumschick S, Bacher S, Evans T, Marková Z, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Vaes-Petignat S, van der Veer G, Vilà M, Nentwig W (2015) Comparing impacts of alien plants and animals using a standard scoring system. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Winter M, … Hulme PE (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101–149Google Scholar
  58. Linc O (2012) Efektivita likvidace invazních druhů v České republice na příkladu bolševníku velkolepého [The efficiency of eradication of invasive species in the Czech Republic exemplified by Heracleum mantegazzianum]. BSc thesis, University of Economics, PragueGoogle Scholar
  59. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions 15:904–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lososová Z, Cimalová Š (2009) Effects of different cultivation types on native and alien weed species richness and diversity in Moravia (Czech Republic). Basic and Applied Ecology 10:456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lososová Z, Grulich V (2009) Chorological spectra of arable weed vegetation types in the Czech Republic. Phytocoenologia 39:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lososová Z, Simonová D (2008) Changes during the 20th century in species composition of synanthropic vegetation in Moravia (Czech Republic). Preslia 80:291–305Google Scholar
  64. Lososová Z, Chytrý M, Cimalová Š, Kropáč Z, Otýpková Z, Pyšek P, Tichý L (2004) Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lososová Z, de Bello F, Chytrý M, Kühn I, Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Winter M, Zelený D (2015) Alien plants invade more phylogenetically clustered communities and cause their even stronger clustering. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Matějček T (2008) Výskyt invazních druhů rostlin v břehové vegetaci vybraných vodních toků [Occurrence of invasive plant species in riverbank vegetation along selected water courses]. Zprávy České botanické společnosti 43, Materiály 23:169–182Google Scholar
  67. McDougall KL, Alexander JM, Haider S, Pauchard A, Walsh NG, Kueffer C (2011) Alien flora of mountains: global comparisons for the development of local preventive measures against plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions 17:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Medvecká J, Kliment J, Májeková J, Halada Ľ, Zaliberová M, Gojdičová E, Feráková V, Jarolímek I (2012) Inventory of the alien flora of Slovakia. Preslia 84:257–310Google Scholar
  69. Mihulka S (1998) The effect of altitude on the pattern of plant invasions: a field test. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I, Williamson M (eds) Plant invasions: ecological mechanisms and human responses. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 313–320Google Scholar
  70. Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Havlíčková V, Zákravský P (2010) Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia 82:365–390Google Scholar
  71. Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2005) Aerial photographs as a tool for assessing the regional dynamics of the invasive plant species Heracleum mantegazzianum. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:1042–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nentwig W, Bacher S, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Kumschick S (2016) The Generic Impact Scoring System (GISS): a standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188:315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Niklfeld H (1998) Mapping the flora of Austria and the eastern Alps. Revue Valdôtaine d’Histoire Naturelle, Suppl 51:53–62Google Scholar
  74. Ööpik M, Kukk T, Kull K, Kull T (2008) The importance of human mediation in species establishment: analysis of the alien flora of Estonia. Boreal Environment Research 13:53–67Google Scholar
  75. Otýpková Z, Chytrý M, Tichý L, Pechanec V, Jongepier JW, Hájek O (2011) Floristic diversity patterns in the White Carpathians Biosphere Reserve, Czech Republic. Biologia 66:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pergl J, Dušek J, Hošek M, Knapp M, Simon O, Berchová K, Bogdan V, Černá M, Poláková S, … Svobodová J (2016) Metodiky mapování a monitoringu invazních (vybraných nepůvodních) druhů [Guidelines for mapping and monitoring invasive (selected alien) species]. Botanický ústav AV ČR, PrůhoniceGoogle Scholar
  77. Pergl J, Genovesi P, Pyšek P (2016b) Better management of alien species. Nature 531:173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petřík P, Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Hejda M, Moravcová L, Perglová I, Štajerová K, Pyšek P (2016c) Dark side of the fence: ornamental plants as a source for spontaneous flora of the Czech Republic. Preslia 88:163–184Google Scholar
  79. Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petrusek A, Laštůvka Z, Musil J, Perglová I, Šanda R, Šefrová H, Šíma J, … Pyšek P (2016d) Black, Grey and Watch Lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28:1–37Google Scholar
  80. Prach K, Řehounková K, Konvalinková P, Trnková R (2008) Invaze a sukcese [Invasion and succession]. Zprávy České botanické společnosti 43, Materiály 23:41–49Google Scholar
  81. Pyšek P, Chytrý M (2014) Habitat invasion research: where vegetation science and invasion ecology meet. Journal of Vegetation Science 25:1181–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2005) Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. In: Inderjit (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Kučera T (2002a) Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biological Conservation 104:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B (2002b) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74:97–186Google Scholar
  85. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Kučera T (2003) Inclusion of native and alien species in temperate nature reserves: an historical study from Central Europe. Conservation Biology 17:1414–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B, Jarošík V (2003b) Czech alien flora and a historical pattern of its formation: what came first to Central Europe? Oecologia 135:122–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pyšek P, Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek A, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Tichý L (2004) Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:781–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J (2004b) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Kropáč Z, Tichý L, Wild J (2005) Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86:772–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pyšek P, Křivánek M, Jarošík V (2009) Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90:2734–2744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Wild J, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Chiron F, Didžiulis V, ... Winter M (2010) Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107:12157–12162PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Danihelka J, Kühn I, Pergl J, Tichý L, Biesmeijer J, Ellis WN, ... Settele J (2011a) Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecological Monographs 81:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J (2011b) Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as greater threat to natural areas? PLoS One 6:e24890PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Wild J (2011c) Colonization of high altitudes by alien plants over the last two centuries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:439–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pyšek P, Chytrý M, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Wild J (2012a) Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. Preslia 84:575–630Google Scholar
  96. Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Kaplan Z, Krahulec F, Moravcová L, … Tichý L (2012b) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155–255Google Scholar
  97. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:1725–1737Google Scholar
  98. Řehounková K, Prach K (2008) Spontaneous vegetation succession in gravel-sand pits: a potential for restoration. Restoration Ecology 16:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Reif J, Hanzelka J, Kadlec T, Štrobl M, Hejda M (2016) Conservation implications of cascading effects among groups of organisms: the alien tree Robinia pseudoacacia in the Czech Republic as a case study. Biological Conservation 198:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rejmánek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 369–388Google Scholar
  101. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2005) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 332–355Google Scholar
  102. Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2012) Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographic patterns. New Phytologist 196:383–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Roy HE, Adriaens T, Aldridge DC, Bacher S, Bishop JDD, Blackburn TM, Branquart E, Brodie J, Carboneras C, … Zenetos A (2015) Invasive alien species – prioritising prevention efforts through horizon scanning. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  105. Rumlerová Z, Vilà M, Pergl J, Nentwig W, Pyšek P (2016) Scoring environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alien plants invasive in Europe. Biological Invasions 18:3697–3711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Pyšek P (2007) Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia 79:303–321Google Scholar
  107. Schönfelder P (1999) Mapping the flora of Germany. Acta Botanica Fennica 162:43–53Google Scholar
  108. Šenová V, Matějček T (2013) Zatížení biotopů geograficky nepůvodními druhy rostlin na příkladu povodí Ploučnice [Level of invasion by alien plants across habitats in the basin of the Ploučnice River]. Geografie 118:356–371Google Scholar
  109. Šíma J (2008) Právní úprava problematiky nepůvodních druhů rostlin v České republice a ve světě [Legislation related to non-native species in the Czech Republic and the world]. Zprávy České botanické společnosti 43, Materiály 23:213–218Google Scholar
  110. Simonová D, Lososová Z (2008) Which factors determine plant invasions in man-made habitats in the Czech Republic? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Skálová H, Guo W-Y, Wild J, Pyšek P (2017) Ambrosia artemisiifolia in the Czech Republic: historic and current invasion pathways predict future spread. Preslia 89:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Slavík B, Smejkal M, Dvořáková M, Grulich V (eds) (1995) Květena České republiky 4 [Flora of the Czech Republic 4]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  113. Slavík B, Chrtek J Jr, Tomšovic P (eds) (1997) Květena České republiky 5 [Flora of the Czech Republic 5]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  114. Slavík B, Chrtek J Jr, Štěpánková J (eds) (2000) Květena České republiky 6 [Flora of the Czech Republic 6]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  115. Slavík B, Štěpánková J, Štěpánek J (eds) (2004) Květena České republiky 7 [Flora of the Czech Republic 7]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  116. Sojneková M, Chytrý M (2015) From arable land to species-rich semi-natural grasslands: succession in abandoned fields in a dry region of central Europe. Ecological Engineering 77:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Štěpánková J, Chrtek J Jr, Kaplan Z (eds) (2010) Květena České republiky 8 [Flora of the Czech Republic 8]. Academia, PrahaGoogle Scholar
  118. Strayer DL, D’Antonio C, Essl F, Fowler M, Geist J, Hilt S, Jarić I, Jöhnk K, Jones CG, ... Jeschke JM (2017) Boom-bust dynamics in biological invasions: definitions, causes, detection, and description. Ecology Letters 20:1337–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tokarska-Guzik B (2005) The establishment and spread of alien plant species (kenophytes) in the flora of Poland. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, KatowiceGoogle Scholar
  120. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, Kreft H, Weigelt P, Kartesz J … Pyšek P (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103Google Scholar
  121. Verloove F (2006) Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800–2005). Scripta Botanica Belgica 39:1–89Google Scholar
  122. Vilà M, Pujadas J (2001) Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biological Conservation 100:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Nentwig W, Olenin S, Roques A, ... DAISIE partners (2010) How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:135–144Google Scholar
  124. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14:702–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Vítková M, Müllerová J, Sádlo J, Pergl J, Pyšek P (2017) Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: a story of an invasive tree. Forest Ecology and Management 384:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Vymyslický T (2001) Rozšíření vybraných invazních druhů rostlin na aluviích jihomoravských řek [Distribution of selected invasive plant species in the floodplains of the southern Moravian rivers]. MSc thesis, Masaryk University, BrnoGoogle Scholar
  127. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  128. Williamson M (2002) Alien plants in the British Isles. In: Pimentel D (ed) Biological invasions: economic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Williamson M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Prach K (2005) On the rates and patterns of spread of alien plants in the Czech Republic, Britain and Ireland. Ecoscience 12:424–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, Arianoutsou M, Basnou C, Delipetrou P, Didžiulis V, … Kühn I (2009) Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:21721–21725Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of SciencesPrůhoniceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPraha 2Czech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Botany and ZoologyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations