Conclusion: Decentralizing Global Economic Governance

  • Jonathan Luckhurst


This chapter concludes the book, synthesizing the preceding evidence and presenting the core claims. The ‘analytical matrix’, focusing on the evidence of decentralizing strategic, political, and cognitive authority among the organization, policymaking, and actors that constitute the global economic architecture, provides important evidence for this chapter. It emphasizes the broad effects of decentralizing authority in global economic governance. This indicates, for example, how the policy areas of global governance analyzed here have been strengthened or adjusted since the GFC. It also demonstrates the importance of strategic, political, and cognitive authority for these shifts. This study is useful for those who want to understand better the contemporary significance of global economic governance, prospects for further cooperation, and some of the key challenges to the global economic architecture.


  1. Adler, E. (2013). Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions, and debates. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (2nd ed., pp. 112–144). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2015). Shaping policy curves: Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Administration, 93(4), 1–17. (Early Access Version).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Goede, M. (2004). Repoliticizing financial risk. Economy and Society, 33(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edkins, J. (1999). Poststructuralism and international relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  5. Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the west: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  6. Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Luckhurst, J. (2016). G20 since the global crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Widmaier, W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Luckhurst
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations