Skip to main content

Globalization, Inequality, and Challenges to Free Trade

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Shifting Global Economic Architecture
  • 563 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes an interrelated set of key economic policy debates since the late twentieth century, concerning issues of globalization, inequality, and trade. This demonstrates, in particular, how the policymaking consequences of recent international politics are influencing the global economic architecture. The core claims of much of the discourse on economic globalization were brought into question by the GFC, further undermining confidence in financial deregulation. Another aspect of this discourse, the emphasis on trade liberalization, also was undermined by the growing influence of ‘populist’ politicians in America and Europe. Rising inequality in many of these countries contributed to the populist political surge in 2016, which has also increased the relative authority shift between some politicians of those states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Their reference to ‘hyperglobalization’ indicates what might be considered a ‘strong version’ of globalization discourse, that is, the most radical interpretation of its perceived political-economic effects.

  2. 2.

    Similar claims were evident in contributions from other influential scholars; cf. Giddens (2002), Ohmae (1990, 1995), and Reich (1992).

  3. 3.

    Rodrik’s (2012, 184–206) conception of a ‘political trilemma of the world economy’ builds on earlier analysis, from economists Robert Mundell (1963) and Marcus Fleming (1962), of the so-called impossible trinity. Rodrik’s (2012, 200–205) ‘trilemma’ model indicates that states must choose between three options in their international economic relations, either: (1) combine ‘hyperglobalization’ with the nation-state, which compels governments to adhere to a narrow set of orthodox, market-friendly policies; (2) combine ‘hyperglobalization’ with democratic political flexibility, by replacing national with global governance or even ‘world government’; or (3) combining the nation-state with democratic political flexibility, implying a return to something like the Bretton Woods compromise. He (Rodrik 2012, 205) notes many governments have attempted to combine the three dimensions, namely democratic choice, the nation-state, and hyperglobalization. The effect, he argues, has been to increase economic instability and the frequency of financial crises.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luckhurst, J. (2018). Globalization, Inequality, and Challenges to Free Trade. In: The Shifting Global Economic Architecture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63157-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics