Advertisement

Introduction: The Shifting Global Economic Architecture

  • Jonathan Luckhurst
Chapter

Abstract

The introduction to the book, this chapter, presents the core analytical focus. This includes a discussion of the main topic in the present study, which is the shifting global economic architecture, as well as introducing the analytical focus on the three dimensions of strategic, political, and cognitive authority. It contextualizes this research within the broader academic literature on global governance and, particularly, global economic governance since the global financial crisis. The chapter further introduces the book, by providing an overview of the chapters.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Acharya, A. (2016). Rethinking demand, purpose and progress in global governance: An introduction. In A. Acharya (Ed.), Why govern? Rethinking demand and progress in global governance (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler, E. (2008). The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO’s post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altman, R. C. (2009). Globalization in retreat: Further geopolitical consequences of the financial crisis. Foreign Affairs, 88(4), 2–9.Google Scholar
  6. Archibugi, D., Held, D., & Köhler, M. (1998). Introduction. In D. Archibugi, D. Held, & M. Köhler (Eds.), Re-imagining political community: Studies in cosmopolitan democracy (pp. 1–10). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bache, I. (2004). Europeanization and multilevel governance: Cohesion policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Bergsten, C. F. (1997). Open regionalism. Peterson Institute for International Economics. (Working paper 97-3). https://piie.com/publications/working-papers/open-regionalism. Accessed 27 June 2017.
  9. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., & van Asselt, H. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blustein, P. (2003). The chastening: Inside the crisis that rocked the global financial system and humbled the IMF (Revised ed.). New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  11. Bremmer, I. (2012). Every nation for itself: Winners and losers in a g-zero world. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
  12. Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2015). Shaping policy curves: Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Administration, 93(4), 1–17. (Early Access Version).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzdugan, S., & Payne, A. (2016). The long battle for global governance. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Capling, A., & Ravenhill, J. (2011). Multilateralising regionalism: What role for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement? The Pacific Review, 24(5), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clegg, S. (2006). The bounds of rationality: Power/history/imagination. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 847–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, A. F. (2008). Executive but expansive: The L20 as a project of ‘new’ multilateralism and ‘new’ regionalism. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. de Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 249–264). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, A. F., Hughes, C. W., & de Lombaerde, P. (Eds.). (2008). Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Crotty, J. (2009). Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the ‘new financial architecture’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12, 185–206.Google Scholar
  22. Drezner, D. W. (2014). The system worked: How the world stopped another Great Depression. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox, J. (2009). The myth of the rational market: A history of risk, reward, and delusion on Wall Street. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Fuchs, D. A. (2002). Globalization and global governance: Discourses on political order at the turn of the century. In D. Fuchs & F. Kratochwil (Eds.), Transformative change and global order: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 1–23). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Speed, E. (2009, August). Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review paper.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (Eds.). (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Helleiner, E. (2016a). Finance. In A. Acharya (Ed.), Why govern? Rethinking demand and progress in global governance (pp. 174–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helleiner, E. (2016b). Legacies of the 2008 crisis for global financial governance. Global Summitry, 2(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hopf, T. (2010). The logic of habit in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations: Remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  40. Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hurd, I. (2008). Constructivism. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Joffe, J. (2009). The default power: The false prophecy of America’s decline. Foreign Affairs, 88(5), 21–35.Google Scholar
  44. Johnston, A. I. (2008). Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Judis, J. B. (2016). The populist explosion: How the great recession transformed American and European politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
  46. Kahler, M. (2013). Rising powers and global governance: Negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Katzenstein, P. J., & Sil, R. (2011). Toward analytic eclecticism: The political economy of an integrated Europe. In D. H. Claes & C. H. Knutsen (Eds.), Governing the global economy: Politics, institutions, and economic development. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Keohane, R. O. (2012). Hegemony and after: Knowns and unknowns in the debate over decline. Foreign Affairs, 91(4), 114–118.Google Scholar
  51. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krauthammer, C. (1990). The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs: America and the World, 70(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krauthammer, C. (2002). The unipolar moment revisited. The National Interest, Winter 2002–03.Google Scholar
  55. Krugman, P. (2009, September 6). How did economists get it so wrong? New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html. Accessed 23 June 2017.
  56. Lake, D. A. (2013). Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the great debates and the rise of eclecticism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 567–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luckhurst, J. (2016). G20 since the global crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCourt, D. M. (2016). Practice theory and relationalism as the new constructivism. International Studies Quarterly, 60, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McGrew, A., & Held, D. (Eds.). (2002). Governing globalization: Power, authority and global governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. Milner, H. V. (1991). The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. Review of International Studies, 17(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Norrlof, C., & Reich, S. (2015). American and Chinese leadership during the global financial crisis: Testing Kindleberger’s stabilization functions. International Area Studies Review, 18(3), 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nye, J. S. (2010). American and Chinese power after the financial crisis. The Washington Quarterly, 33(4), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. London/New York: Collins.Google Scholar
  64. Payne, R. A. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rachman, G. (2011). Think again: American decline. This time it’s for real. Foreign Policy, 184, 58–63.Google Scholar
  66. Reich, R. B. (1992). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  67. Reich, S., & Lebow, R. N. (2014). Good-bye hegemony! Power and influence in the global system. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International crises of legitimacy. International Politics, 44(2/3), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodrik, D. (2012). The globalization paradox: Why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & O.-E. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1, 13–43.Google Scholar
  73. Rosenau, J. N. (2007). Governing the ungovernable: The challenge of a global disaggregation of authority. Regulation & Governance, 1(1), 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, O.-E. (Eds.). (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization, 52(4), 855–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scholte, J. A. (2004). Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schweller, R. L., & Pu, X. (2011). After unipolarity: China’s visions of international order in an era of U.S. decline. International Security, 36(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.Google Scholar
  80. Sikkink, K. (2005). Patterns of dynamic multilevel governance and the insider-outsider coalition. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest & global activism (pp. 151–174). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  81. Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Slaughter, S. (2013). The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20: Legitimacy, accountability, and public contestation. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sohn, I. (2005). Asian financial cooperation: The problem of legitimacy in global financial governance. Global Governance, 11(4), 487–504.Google Scholar
  84. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and the logic of international collective action: Re-examining the Bretton Woods Institutions. In D. Nayyar (Ed.), Governing globalization: Issues and institutions (pp. 238–253). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-Western world: How emerging powers are remaking global order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  86. Telò, M. (2001). Introduction: Globalization, new regionalism and the role of the European Union. In M. Telò (Ed.), European Union and new regionalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  87. Thakur, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (2008). Enhancing global governance through regional integration. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. de Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 17–42). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Tussie, D., & Riggirrozi, P. (2015). A global conversation: Rethinking IPE in post-hegemonic scenarios. Contexto Internacional, 37(3), 1041–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  90. Widmaier, W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Young, O. R. (1989). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Luckhurst
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations