Skip to main content

Child and Adolescent Forensic Psychiatry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychiatry and the Law
  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

Juveniles are a population that hold a special place within the legal system. This special place has evolved over centuries. Recognizing what has contributed to that evolution is important in appreciating the forensic issues that arise within child and adolescent psychiatry. This has included the development of the juvenile court system and the numerous reforms which have taken place within that system. It is also important to understand the concept of culpability and how this concept is applied to juveniles when determining the appropriate punishment for a crime. The US Supreme Court has reviewed several cases that have contributed to an evolving understanding of juveniles within the courts and the extent to which minors are able to be punished. In their decisions, the Court has recognized several aspects of the neurobiological and social development of children and adolescents which contributes to their propensity to engage in criminal behavior and their subsequent potential to be found responsible for their actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Graham v. Florida. United States reports; 2010. p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myers JE. A short history of child protection in America. Fam Law Q. 2008;42(3):449–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grossman J. Fair labor standards act of 1938: Maximum struggle for a minimum wage United States department of labor. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/flsa1938.

  4. Burke AS. Under construction: brain formation, culpability, and the criminal justice system. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011;34(6):381–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landess J. Civil and constitutional rights of adjudicated youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25(1):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mack JW. The juvenile court. Harv Law Rev. 1909;23:104–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ash P. Adolescents in adult court: does the punishment fit the criminal? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(2):145–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kent v. United States. United States reports: United States Supreme Court; 1966. p. 541.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In re Gault. United States reports; 1967. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bulletin: Juveniles and the Death Penalty. Coordinating council on juvenile justice and delinquency prevention. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ash P. But he knew it was wrong: evaluating adolescent culpability. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(1):21–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. The Law Dictionary [Internet]. [cited Jan 22, 2017]. Available from: thelawdictionary.org.

  13. American Academy of Psychiatry and Law. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(4 Suppl):S3–S76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanenhaus DS. Juvenile justice in the making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eddings v. Oklahoma. United State reports; 1982. p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson v. Oklahoma. United States reports; 1988. p. 815.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford v. Kentucky. United States reports; 1989. p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roper v. Simmons. United States reports; 2005. p. 551.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U.S Health and Human Services. Youth violence: a report of the surgeon general. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(3):399.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner M, Steinberg L. Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):625–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel DM. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011;20(3):431–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SJ, Kraus LJ. Transfer of juvenile cases to criminal court. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25(1):41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. xliv, 947.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos A. Salgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salgado, C.A. (2017). Child and Adolescent Forensic Psychiatry. In: Wasser, T. (eds) Psychiatry and the Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63148-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63148-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63147-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63148-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics