Skip to main content

Primary Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasound Program Management

Abstract

Point of care ultrasound is being adopted by primary care specialties at an increasing rate. While many of the applications may be similar, the practice and location of this POC ultrasound setting presents opportunities and challenges. Educational and practice adoption may have unique elements in the primary care setting. In addition, leadership, technical, economic, and educational US management concepts are discussed in this common medical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Croft LM, Wl D, Golman ME. A pilot study of the clinical impact of hand-carried cardiac ultrasound in the medical clinic. Echocardiography. 2006;23(6):439–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ. Noncardiac point-of-care ultrasound by Nonradiologist physicians: how widespread is it? J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:772–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinreb JC, Wilcox PA. How do training, education, and experience affect quality in radiology? J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:510–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leone AF, Schumacher SM, Krothis DE, Eleazer GP. Geriatricians’ Interest to Learn Bedside Portable Ultrasound (GEBUS) for Application in the Clinical Practice and in Education. JAMDA 2012; 13;308.e7–308.e10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berkoff DJ, English J, Theodoro D. Sports medicine ultrasound(US) beyond the musculoskeletal system: use in the abdomen, solid organs, lung, heart and eye. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:161–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosey RG, Kriss V, Uhl TL, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of splenic enlargement in athletes with acute infectious mononucleosis. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:974–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mjolstad OC, Snare SR, Folkvord L, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by GPs using pocket-sized ultrasound. Fam Pract. 2012;29(5):534–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Blois, B. Office-based ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Can Fam Physician 2011;58:e 172–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bornemann MAJ, Bornemann G. Military family physicians’ perceptions of a pocket point-of-care ultrasound device in clinical practice. Mil Med. 2014;79:1474–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akhikari MD, Amini R, Stolz L, et al. Implementation of a novel point-of-care ultrasound billing reimbursement program: fiscal impact. Am J of Emerg Med. 2014;32:592–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta M, Jacobson T, Peters D, et al. Handheld ultrasound versus physical examination in patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography for a suspected cardiac condition. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7(10):983–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Landers A, Ryan B. The use of bedside ultrasound and community based paracentesis in a palliative care service. J Prim Health Care. 2014;6(2):148–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology. 2004;43(7):887–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vogelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Juni P. Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(1):304–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arida A, Kyprianou M, Kanakis M, Sfikakis P. The diagnostic role of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in giant cell arteritis: a second metanalysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:44–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McGahan JP, Pozniak MA, Cronan J, et al. Handheld ultrasound: threat or opportunity? Appl Radiol. 2015;3:20–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spencer JK, Adler RS. Utility of portable ultrasound in a community in Ghana. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1735–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. PLatz D, Goldflam K, Mennicke M, et al. Comparison of web versus classroom-based basic ultrasonographic and EFAST training in 2 Euporean hospitals. AEM. 2010;56:660–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Cartier R, Skinner C, Laselle B. Perceived Effectiveness of Teaching Methods for Point of Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med 2014;47:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowra J, Dawson M, Goudie A, and Mallin M. Sounding out the future of ultrasound education. Ultrasound 2014;1–5. C. Cartier R, Skinner C, Laselle B. Perceived Effectiveness of Teaching Methods for Point of Care Ultrasound. J Emerg Med 2014;47:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apostololos P. Dallas MD, FACP, CHCP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dallas, A.P. (2018). Primary Care. In: Tayal, V., Blaivas, M., Foster, T. (eds) Ultrasound Program Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63143-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63143-1_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63141-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63143-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics