Skip to main content

Abe Cabinet and the TPP Negotiations on “Trade Sensitivities”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Japan’s Foreign Policy Making

Abstract

One of the biggest policy achievements in the area of trade and economy for the second Abe Shinzō cabinet was the conclusion and ratification of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in 2016, in spite of strong domestic opposition. The chapter analyzes the negotiation process on agricultural products, giving special attention to institutional tools introduced by administrative reform of 2001, which were employed by Prime Minister Abe in order to shape the decision-making process on the TPP. The main argument is that it was precisely those tools that enabled Abe to establish control over the policy process on TPP, coordinate conflicting interests of various domestic actors, and to reach the final compromise. Moreover, taken from the perspective of neoclassical realism, the case study of the TPP certifies to the importance of intervening factors of domestic politics, which accounted for the final outcome of the TPP policy. Furthermore, the TPP was used by Abe and other officials, as well as big business, as a chance to reform the problem of agriculture which politically had been untouchable for decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The system was proposed by the DPJ in the electoral manifesto for the 2009 Lower House election, which partially might have contributed to the party’s success in agricultural districts (Moriguchi 2013). Many farmers were dissatisfied at that time with the program introduced by the LDP, which compensated only big farms.

  2. 2.

    Ozawa has strongly advocated trade liberalization policy since the early 1990s, explicated in his widely read and translated into English book, Blueprint for a New Japan (Ozawa 1994: 122–127).

  3. 3.

    For the TPP to come to effect, at least six countries accounting 85% of GDP have to ratify it within two years from signing the agreement. Due to the scale of GDP, the ratification by the United States and Japan is necessary for the agreement.

  4. 4.

    The DPJ made references to trade liberalization policy much earlier, already in their manifesto of 2007.

  5. 5.

    The policy included also a statement about the establishment of the Headquarters for the Promotion of Agriculture Structural Reforms (Nōgyō Kōzō Kaikaku Sokushin Honbu). The Headquarters, presided by the prime minister and vice-chaired by the minister of state for national policy and agriculture minister, was to prepare a proposal by June 2011, and an Action Plan by October 2011.

  6. 6.

    Mulgan (2015a: 128–129) makes a list of business and agricultural organizations who declared their stance on the TPP, dividing them into supporting, opposing, and cautious.

  7. 7.

    Suga shared this idea with his “teacher,” Kajiyama Seiroku, who served as CCS under the Hashimoto administration (Matsuda 2016: 261–262).

  8. 8.

    What is even more interesting, Nishikawa was fully aware of this strategy. Nishikawa (2017) discussed it in his book TPP Shinjitsu [Truth about the TPP], which caused much controversy in the Diet in April 2016, leading to the postponing of deliberations on the TPP bills to the next extraordinary session. Nishikawa uses the exact term that Abe was trying to control zoku parliamentarians by zoku parliamentarians.

  9. 9.

    It was during the negotiations in Singapore in February 2014, during which Nishikawa met informally with the Australian Minister for Trade and Investment, Andrew Lobb, and prepared the ground for the agreement on beef and automobile parts (Ōtsu 2014: 4).

  10. 10.

    It is a system regulating the rice production output in order to keep the price of rice. Farmers switching to other crops are subsidized by the state.

  11. 11.

    Abe also gave up the idea of holding general election for both houses due to the Kumamoto earthquake.

  12. 12.

    LDP won also seats in local and other elections. In April 27, 2014, in the by-election to Lower House from one of the districts of Kagoshima, which is a agriculture-based prefecture known for pork and sugar cane, the LDP-backed candidate won. It was interpreted as a sign of support for the Abe cabinet (Asahi Shinbun 2014f, April 28).

  13. 13.

    Yomiuri Shinbun published results of opinion polls before election to the Upper House separately for all major prefectures. The highest percentage of voters who mentioned the TPP as important policy was in Yamagata Prefecture and reached only 4%. In Akita it was 3%, and in Niigata 2% (Yomiuri Shinbun 2016c, June 25a). There were differences of opinion depending on profession, and, as expected, substantially more farmers expressed interests in the TPP although they did not constitute a majority. In Kumamoto Prefecture, for instance, over 20% expressed interest in the TPP (Yomiuri Shinbun 2016d, June 25b).

References

  • Abe, S. (2015, April 29). An Alliance of Hope. Address to a Joint Meeting of the US Congress. Washington, DC. Accessed March 2, 2017, from http://japan.kantei.go.jp/97_abe/statement/201504/uscongress.htm

  • Amano, T. (2016, March 7). Kome “Eikyō 0 En” Hontō? TPP Kuni Shisan, Chihō Kara Iron, Aomori wa “Nen 23 Okuen Gen” [“0 Yen effect on rise,” really? Government’s estimate on TPP, objections from local regions, “23 Billion Yen decrease annually” for Aomori]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2008, November 25). Ondanka Taisaku Shinten Nashi, Shunō Sengen o Saitaku Shita Kaimaku APEC [No progress on green house effect, declaration of heads of states at APEC closing], p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010a, October 2). Nichigin ni Kyōki, Irei no Chūmon “Hitsuyō na Seisaku Taiō o” Kan Shushō Shoshin Hyōmei [Aggressively towards Bank of Japan, unusual request of “necessary policy measures,” prime minister Kan’s policy speech], p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010b, October 8). “Amari ni Tototsu” Shinohara Takashi Nōrin Fukudaijin [“Supprise for Amari,” Shinohara Takashi agriculture vice minister], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010c, October 9). Taiheiyō Kyōtei Meguri Seimei, Nichibei Zaikaijin Kaigi [Japan–US Business Council declaration on TPP], p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010d, October 15). APEC ni Keizaikai Teigen [Proposal of the business circles for APEC], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010e, October 14). Beika Kyūraku, Seiken Kanashibari, Jiyū Bōeki Kyōtei, Sanka Iyoku ni Tsuyomaru Hanpatsu [Sharp decline of rice price, the government bound by free trade agreement, rising protest against the will to participate], p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010f, October 19). Minshu Giin, TPP Hihan no Benkyōkai [DPJ lawmakers, study group critical to TPP], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010g, October 20). “TPP wa Nihon Nōgyō Kowasu,” Yotō de Hihan Kakudai [“TPP will destroy Japanese agriculture,” growing criticism inside the ruling parties], p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010h, October 22a). TPP Sanka Nara GDP 3 Chōen Zō, Naikakufu Shisan [3 billion increase of GDP when TPP joined, Cabinet Office’s estimates], p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010i, October 22b). Minshu “TPP” Batoru Taiheiyō Chiku no Kanzei Teppai, Zei ka Hi ka [DPJ “TPP” battle on tariff elimination in Pacific region, right or wrong?], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010j, October 23). TPP Shisan Gōsen, Kanzei Teppai, Naikakufu “GDP 3 Chōen Zō,” Nōrinshō wa Shinchō, Keisanshō wa Suishin [TPP estimate fight, tariffs abolition, Cabinet Office “3 billion Yen increase of GDP,” MAFF cautious, METI in favor], p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010k, October 27). TPP Giron Meisō Kakuryō, Susumanu Ishi Tōitsu, Ōhata Keisanshō, Shinchō Shisei ni [Straying debate on TPP among Cabinet Ministers, lack of unity, METI Minister Ōhata, cautious attitude], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010l, October 28). Shushō “TPP wa Shōhizei to wa Chigaun Da,” Kan Gaikō, Shōnenba Tsuzuku, Kanzei Teppai ni Rikiten, Iron mo [Prime Minister “TPP differs from consumption tax, Kan’s diplomacy, the moment of truth continues, emphasis on tariff elimination, some objections], p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010m, November 2). Minshu, TPP Fumikomazu Jizen Kyōgi Teigen, Shinchōron ni Hairyo [DPJ, Proposal of prior consultation without reference to TPP, consideration for cautious attitudes], p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2010n, November 5). Kan Seiken no “Honkido” Shōten TPP, Minshu ga Teigen [Kan administration’s “degree of sincerity,” focus on TPP, DPJ proposition], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014a, February 10). TPP Kakuryō Kaigō, 22–25 Nichi ni Kaisai, Nankō no Kanzei nado Kyōgi [Cabinet ministers meeting on TPP, organized on 22–25, discussions on problematic tariffs and other], p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014b, February 20). Nōsanbutsu Kanzei Teppai, Kentō no Yochi Shimesu, Jimin Ishiba Kanjichō [Elimination of tariff on agricultural products, LDP Secretary-General Ishiba indicates possibility of investigation], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014c, February 21). “Nōsanhin Mamore” JA Kinkyū Shūkai TPP [“Protect agricultural products,” JA emergency meeting on TPP], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014d, April 22). Asahi Shinbunsha Seron Chōsa, Shitsumon to Kaitō [Opinion poll by Asahi Shinbunsha, questions and answers], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014e, April 24). TPP Shunō Kaidan go mo Kakuryō Kyōgi Nichibei, Kyōdō Bunshozume, Senkaku ni Anpo Tekiyō, Obama Shi ga Teigen [US–Japan ministerial deliberations also after summit meeting, joint statement conclusion, security alliance applicable to Senkaku, Obama declaration], Evening ed., p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2014f, April 28). Shūin Hosen, Jimin ga Shōri, Yatō Kyōtō Oyobazu, Kagoshima 2-ku [By-election to Upper House, LDP victory, no united front of opposition parties, Kagoshima 2nd District], p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2015, November 27). Shushō, Hosei Yosanan no Hensei Shiji, Kaigo Seibi, Nōkyō, Hashira ni [Prime minister orders formation of supplementary budget, elderly care system and agriculture as pillars], Evening ed., p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2016a, March 5). Yatō Renkei, Shūinsen wa Nandai, Dōnichisen no Ugoki, Minshu, Kyōryoku Hiteiteki [Opposition parties cooperation, problematic lower house election, movements toward the same day elections, DPJ, negative towards cooperation], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2016b, March 9). TPP Hōan, Kakugi Kettei, Tokubetsuin de Ronsen Honkakuka e [TPP bill, cabinet decision, towards fullfledged debate in special committee], p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2016c, April 8). Netto Shoten, Kieta Naimaku Hon, TPP Kōshō Katei, Nishikawa Shi ga Hippitsu, Tokubetsuin Funkyū Shi Chūdan [Internet bookstore, inside-information book disappears, negotiations process on TPP, written by Nishikawa, complications and break off at special committee], Evening ed., p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2016d, February 4). TPP Kyōtei no Ishiki Chōsa [Attitude survey on TPP agreement], Yamagata ed., p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Shinbun. (2016e, May 3). Asahi Shinbunsha Seron Chōsa [Opinion poll by Asahi Shinbunsha]. Higashi Tokushū L (Tokyo special edition L), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Democratic Party of Japan. (2009). Manifesto [Manifest]. Accessed April 15, 2017, from http://archive.dpj.or.jp/special/manifesto2009/pdf/manifesto_2009.pdf

  • Hiromiya, Y. (2011). TPP ga Nihon o Kowasu [TPP will destroy Japan]. Aoki Fumitaka, supervision. Tōkyō: Fusōsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honma, M. (2015). The TPP and Agricultural Reform in Japan. In A. G. Mulgan & M. Honnma (Eds.), Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp. 94–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara, K. (2015). Nōkyō Kaikaku to TPP Kōshō [Nōkyō Reforms and TPP Negotiations]. Jichi Sōken (July), 44, 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishimatsu, H., & Ōhata, S. (2015, November 8). Jimin, TPP Settoku Angya, “Gensanchi Hyōji, Tetteiteki ni” [LDP, pilgrimage with TPP explanation, “indication of origin to be thorough”]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamitzky, U. (2015). The TTP Debate in Japan: Reasons for a Failed Protest Campaign. Asia Pacific Perspectives, 14(1), 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujiraoka, H. (2016). Dokyumento TPP Kōshō [Document, TPP Negotiations]. Tōkyō: Tōyō Keizai Shinbunsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujiraoka, H., Ōhashi, S., & Keii, S. (2015, December 25). “TPP Kōka 13.6 Chōen” GDP Seifu Shisan, Koyō 79.5 Mannin Zō [“TPP effect of 3 billion yen increase” in government’s TPP estimate of GDP, jobs increase by 795 thousands]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masumitsu, Y., Murayama, Y., & Ōshima, T. (2014, April 25). TPP, Saishū Chōsei Tsuzuku, Nichibei Kōshō, Rinichi mae no Dakyō Mezasu [Continuation of final Japanese-US negotiations, aiming at compromise before leaving Japan]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, K. (2016). Kage no Kenryokusha, Naikaku Kanbō Chōkan Suga Yoshihide [A Wirepuller: Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide]. Tōkyō: Kōdansha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2016). Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA). Accessed February 2, 2017, from http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/fta/index.html

  • Moriguchi, H. (2013). Nōgyōsha Kobetsu Shotoku Hoshō Seido wa Baramaki Datta ka? [Was the Expenditures for the Income Security Program for Farmers’ Household Wasteful, Irresponsible Spending?]. Kikan Seisaku Keiei Kenkyū [Quarterly Journal of Public Policy and Management], 1, 91–101. Accessed February 5, 2017, from http://www.murc.jp/thinktank/rc/quarterly/quarterly_detail/201301_91.pdf

  • Mulgan, A. G. (2014). Bringing the Party Back: How the DPJ Diminished Prospects for Japanese Agricultural Trade Liberalization under the TPP. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, A. G. (2015a). To TPP or Not TPP: Interest Groups and Trade Policy. In A. G. Mulgan & M. Honnma (Eds.), Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp. 123–156). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, A. G. (2015b). Understanding Japanese Trade Policy: A Political Economy Perspective. In A. G. Mulgan & M. Honnma (Eds.), Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp. 1–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, T. (2011). TPP Bōkokuron [TPP Theory of National Ruin]. Tōkyō: Shūeisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa, K. (2017). TPP no Shinjitsu: Sōdaina Kyōtei o Matomeageta Otokotachi [Truth About TPP: Men Who Finalized the Grand Agreement of TPP]. Tōkyō: Chūō Kōronsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōhata, S. (2015, November 17). Chikusan Nōka e no Sonshitsu, Jimin, Tai TPP de Saishūan [Loss compensation to stock rising farmers, final proposal of LDP on TPP]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōshima, T., & Watanabe, T. (2014, April 24). (Jiji Kokukoku) Keizai, Anpo, Seika ni Nōtan, Nichibei Shunō Kaidan [(now and then) economy and security, various results at the Japan–US summit]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōshita, E. (2014). Naikaku Kanbō Chōkan Hiroku [Secret Notes of Chief Cabinet Secretary]. Tōkyō: Īsuto Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōtsu, T. (2014, March 6). (Seisei Ryūten) Nishikawa Kōya, Jimintō TPP Taisaku Iinchō, Shayō no Nōrinzoku, Genshi Hōkō [(Political wanderings) LDP Committee for TPP Measures chairperson Nishikawa Kōya, declining agriculture zoku, selfless devotion]. Asahi Shinbun, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, I. (1994). Blueprint for a New Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pempel, T. J. (1993). From Exporter to Investor: Japanese Foreign Economic Policy. In G. L. Curtis (Ed.), Japan’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Coping with Change (pp. 105–136). New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. (2010, November 9). Hōkatsuteki Keizai Renkei ni Kansuru Kihon Hōshin [Basic policy on comprehensive economic cooperation]. Kakugi Kettei [Cabinet decision]. Accessed April 14, 2017, from http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/kakugikettei/2010/1109kihonhousin.html. Provisional translation into English available at http://japan.kantei.go.jp/kan/topics/20101109basicpolicyepa.pdf

  • Sakuyama, T. (2015). Nihon no TPP Kōshō Sanka no Shinjitsu [The truth about Japan’s participation in the TPP negotiations]. Tōkyō: Bunshindō.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoppa, L. J. (1997). Bargaining with Japan. What American Pressure Can and Cannot Do. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tettai o Motomeru Kai (Association Demanding Prompt Withdrawal from TPP Accession). (2013). Kōshiki Buroggu [Official blog]. Accessed March 3, 2017, from http://ameblo.jp/tpp-tekkai/

  • TPP Seifu Taisaku Honbu (Government Headquarters for TPP Measures). (2015). Text of the Agreement. Preamble. Accessed March 14, 2017, from https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/_securedfiles/trans-pacific-partnership/text/0.-preamble.pdf

  • TPP Sōgō Taisaku Honbu (Headquarters for TPP Comprehensive Measures). (2015, October 9). Taiheiyō Pātonāshippu (TPP) Kyōtei Kōshō no Ōsuji Gōi o Fumaeta Sōgōteki na Seisaku Taiō ni Kansuru Kihon Hōshin [Basic plan for comprehensive policy measures regarding basic agreement on TPP agreement negotiations]. TPP Sōgō Taisaku Honbu Kettei [Decision by the headquarters for TPP comprehensive measures]. Accessed April 14, 2017, from http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/topics/2015/tpp/20151009hoshin.pdf

  • UHSCAFF (Upper House Standing Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). (2013, April 18). Resolution on Japan’s Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Negotiations. Accessed January 23, 2017, from http://www.sangiin.go.jp/eng/report/standingcommittee/20130617-TPP.pdf

  • Urata, S. (2015). Postwar Japanese Trade Policy: A Shift from Multilateral GATT/WTO to Bilateral/Regional FTA Regimes. In A. G. Mulgan & M. Honnma (Eds.), Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp. 41–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2013, February 22). Joint Statement by the United States and Japan. Accessed January 20, 2017, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/22/joint-statement-united-states-and-japan

  • Yamashita, K. (2015). The Political Economy of Japanese Agricultural Trade Negotiations. In A. G. Mulgan & M. Honnma (Eds.), Political Economy of Japanese Trade Policy (pp. 71–93). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2015, November 10). Naikaku Shijiritsu Jōshō 51%, Honsha Zenkoku Seron Chōsa [Rise of cabinet support to 51%, national opinion poll by Yomiuri Shinbunsha], p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016a, November 4). TPP Sōki Hijun Uttae [Call for prompt TPP ratification], p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016b, February 26). Abenomikusu 3 Nen, Honsha Zenkoku Seron Chōsa [3 years of Abenomics, national opinion poll by Yomiuri Shinbunsha, wiping out anxiety about the future is essential], p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016c, June 25). San’insen, Honsha Seron Chōsa (Shita) Tōhyō “Kanarazu Iku” 58%, Zenkai o Shitamawaru, Niigata [Upper house election, opinion poll by Yomiuri Shinbusha, 58% says “will definitely go,” lower than previous elections, Niigata], p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016d, June 25). San’insen Jōsei Seron Chōsa (Shita), “Shakai Hosho” Jūshi 32%, Kumamoto [Upper house election, opinion poll (part 2) “social security” important for 32%, Kumamoto], Seibu ed., p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016e, November 1). TPP Hōan, Yokka Tsūka Kōsan, Shūin [TPP bill, likely passage on the 4th, lower house], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016f, November 2). Kyōkō Saiketsu Hatsugen “Jōdan,” Yamamoto Nōshō [Declaration of steamrolling the bill as a “joke,” Agriculture Minister Yamamoto], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016g, November 5). Nōshō Shazai de Makuhiki Hakaru, Seifu Yotō, Mondai Hatsugen Meguri, Shūin Gichō wa Kaidan Unagasu [Ruling parties attempt at ending the problem by agriculture minister’s apology for problematic statement, speaker of the lower house presses for talks], p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yomiuri Shinbun. (2016h, November 11). TPP Shōnin’an Shūin Tsūka, Bei Gikai wa Saiketsu Konnan ka [TPP ratification bill passes the lower house, problematic adoption by the US Congress?], p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakowski, K. (2015). Decision-making Reform in Japan. The DPJ’s Failed Attempt at a Politician-led Government. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zakowski, K., Bochorodycz, B., Socha, M. (2018). Abe Cabinet and the TPP Negotiations on “Trade Sensitivities”. In: Japan’s Foreign Policy Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63094-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics