Skip to main content

Climate Change Negotiations Under the DPJ Government

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Japan’s Foreign Policy Making

Abstract

Before ascending to power in September 2009, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) heralded major changes in foreign policy direction. Part of the election campaign concentrated on environmental legislations and ambitious climate policy. Prime Minister Hatoyama Yukio shared a vision of taking a lead in negotiations on cutting greenhouse gases. He made one of the most ambitious declarations in the history of Japan’s participation in the United Nations climate talks. This environmental shift in foreign and domestic policy appeared under rather favorable international circumstances. The Conference of the Parties in Copenhagen was expected to be a major step in the global warming mitigation process. Engagement in a more ambitious climate policy by the Hatoyama administration was an example of using the privilege of initiating important changes by the prime minister despite heavy interministerial struggles and active opposition from domestic interest groups. Thanks to the relaxation of the rule of dispersed management Prime Minister Hatoyama was able to present a different stance on climate policy soon after assuming office. Although one could not identify strong veto players among the groups usually engaged in Japan’s foreign policy formulation, opposition from other ministries and business circles had a significant influence on the perception of the DPJ’s climate program. This chapter shows how a lack of leadership skills, weak policy execution, and defective coordination prevented the prime minister and the Kantei from making progress even in a relatively favorable international setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cap and trade is a flexible approach to emission reduction which places emission limits on particular companies or sectors. The companies can choose between cutting CO2 levels or buying additional emission permits from entities that did not use their full allowance.

  2. 2.

    System of payment for households and companies generating electricity from renewable sources. A limited feed-in tariff mechanism had been launched by the previous LDP administration, but was limited to solar power producers. The DPJ promised to introduce a comprehensive feed-in tariff system which would promote all renewable energy sources.

References

  • Aburaki, K. (2010). The Politics of Climate Change in Japan. In M. Green & A. Searight (Eds.), Green Dragons: The Politics of Climate Change in Asia: A Report of the CSIS Asian Regionalism Initiative (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: CSIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, B. F. D. (2005). Building a National Environmental Regime. In B. Barrett (Ed.), Ecological Modernization and Japan (pp. 27–49). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, P. (2010, July). Cold Climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19(4), 637–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Democratic Party of Japan. (2009). The Democratic Party of Japan’s Platform for Government. Accessed January 10, 2017, from https://www.dpj.or.jp/english/manifesto/manifesto2009.pdf

  • den Elzen, M., Hoff, A. F., & Mendoza, A. (2009). The Copenhagen Accord: Abatement Costs and Carbon Prices Resulting from the Submissions. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(1), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWit, A., & Iida, T. (2009). Is Hatoyama Reckless or Realistic? Making the Case for a 25% Cut in Japanese Greenhouse Gases. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 7(38,4), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWit, A., & Iida, T. (2011). The “Power Elite” and Environmental-Energy Policy in Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 9(4,4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, M. (2009, September 21). Yukio Hatoyama: Turning Brotherly Love into Policy. Financial Times Online. Accessed June 6, 2015, from https://www.ft.com/content/6f93ca38-a3e9-11de-9fed-00144feabdc0

  • Feldman, S. (2010, December 2). Japan’s Motion to Kill Kyoto Protocol a “Slap in the Face.” Advocates Say. Reuters Online. Accessed April 20, 2013, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/12/02/idUS219608262920101202

  • Fujioka, C. (2009, December 11). Japan to Drop CO2 Pledge if no Broader Climate Deal. Reuters Online. Accessed April 4, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/11/us-climate-japan-idUSTRE5BA15820091211

  • Kagawa-Fox, M. (2012). The Ethics of Japan’s Global Environmental Policy: The Conflict between Principles and Practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama, Y. (2003). Climate Change as Japanese Foreign Policy: From Reactive to Proactive. In P. G. Harris (Ed.), Global Warming and East Asia: The Domestic and International Politics of Climate Change (pp. 135–151). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama, Y. (2010). Japan in the Midst of Multilateral Negotiations on the Future Framework for Climate Change. In A. Uegaki & S. Tabata (Eds.), The Elusive Balance: Regional Powers and the Search for Sustainable Development (pp. 187–199). Sapporo: Slavic Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. E. (2010). Hatoyama Administration and Climate Change Initiatives. East Asian Policy, 2(1), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa, A. (2010). Copenhagen and the Consequences. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 45(1), 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2009). Reflections from Copenhagen: The Accord and the Way Forward. World Resources Institute. Accessed April 20, 2013, from http://www.wri.org/stories/2009/12/reflections-copenhagen-accord-and-way-forward

  • Oshitani, S. (2006). Global Warming Policy in Japan and Britain, Interactions between Institutions and Issue Characteristics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pajon, C. (2010). Japan’s Ambivalent Diplomacy on Climate Change. IFRI Health and Environment Reports No. 5. Paris and Brussels: IFRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj, J., Chen, C., & Nabel, J. (2010). Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord Pledges and Its Global Climatic Impacts—A Snapshot of Dissonant Ambitions. Environmental Research Letters, 5, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, I. H. (1995). The Climate Change Negotiations Berlin and Beyond. The Journal of Environment Development, 4(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawa, A. (2009). The High Price Paid for Hatoyama Speech. Nippon Keidanren. Accessed November 23, 2016, from http://www.keidanren.or.jp/21ppi/english/pdf/091030.pdf

  • Schreurs, M. (2002). Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, M. (2005). Japan in the Greenhouse – The Challenge of Addressing Rising Emissions. In B. Barrett (Ed.), Ecological Modernization and Japan (pp. 149–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H. (2017). The Economy and Public Finance: The Challenges and Setbacks of the Reform. In Y. Funabashi & K. Nakano (Eds.), The Democratic Party of Japan in Power: Challenges and Failures (pp. 52–75). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, Y., & Shreurs, M. (2010). Climate Leadership, Japanese Style: Embedded Symbolism and Post-2001 Kyoto Protocol Politics. In K. Harrison & L. McIntosh Sundstrom (Eds.), The Comparative Politics of Climate Change (pp. 139–168). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2009a). Copenhagen Climate Change Conference – December 2009. Accessed March 13, 2013, from http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/items/5257.php

  • UNFCCC. (2009b). Note Verbale. Accessed April 13, 2013, from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/japancphaccord_app1.pdf

  • UNFCCC. (2009c). Department of Climate Change, National Development & Reform Commission of China. Accessed March 13, 2013, from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/chinacphaccord_app2.pdf

  • UNFCCC. (2009d). Government of India Ministry of Environment & Forests. Accessed March 13, 2013, from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/indiacphaccord_app2.pdf

  • Vidal, J. (2010, April 11). Climate Aid Threat to Countries that Refuse to Back Copenhagen Accord. The Observer. Accessed April 20, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/11/climate-aid-threats-copenhagen-accord

  • WikiLeaks. (2009a, September 8). PM-Elect Hatoyama Announces Stricter Greenhouse Gas Targets. 09TOKYO2067_a. Accessed October 12, 2016, from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TOKYO2067_a.html

  • WikiLeaks. (2009b, September 23). Daily Summary of Japanese Press 09/23/09. 09TOKYO2226_a. Accessed October 12, 2016, from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TOKYO2226_a.html

  • WikiLeaks. (2009c, September 25). Daily Summary of Japanese Press 09/25/09. 09TOKYO2247_a. Accessed October 13, 2016, from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TOKYO2247_a.html

  • WikiLeaks. (2009d, November 14). Japanese Morning Press Highlights 11/14/09. 09TOKYO2632_a. Accessed October 16, 2016, from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TOKYO2632_a.html

  • WikiLeaks. (2009e, December 10). Japanese Morning Press Highlights 12/10/09. 09TOKYO2821_a. Accessed October 16, 2016, from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TOKYO2821_a.html

  • Wu, S.-Y. J. (2009). Toward a Model of International Environmental Action: A Case Study of Japan’s Environmental Conversion and Participation in the Climate Change Environmental Regime. Review of Policy Research. The Policy Studies Organization, 26(3), 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakowski, K. (2015). Decision-making Reform in Japan: The DPJ’s Failed Attempt at a Politician-led Government. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zakowski, K., Bochorodycz, B., Socha, M. (2018). Climate Change Negotiations Under the DPJ Government. In: Japan’s Foreign Policy Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63094-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics