Abstract
Historically, a division of scientific labor evolved in the USA where universities conducted basic or pure research, federal laboratories and bureaus conducted applied research, and private industry engaged in the development of new products and commercial processes. These boundaries have never been impermeable, but for the most part, basic research and applied research have been conducted by different individuals, who are physically separated by location, and who are also divided by the “two cultures” of academia and business. Much has been written about the incompatibility of the two cultures of business and academia, but that incompatibility is intensified when entrepreneurial culture is brought inside the university, and ironically, this is particularly true in the corporate bureaucratic university. The contradiction between the principles of corporate-bureaucratic organization and entrepreneurial flexible organization is illustrated in four general problems: the pigs at the trough syndrome, the “if I can’t have it, then you can’t have it” syndrome, the campus meetings culture, and the never answers the phone dilemma.
The professional educator is quite as likely to become
narrow and provincial as is any other specialist…it may
not follow that those same learned men are the best judges
of what should be the trend of that educational system…
Keen foresight, a wise and well-seasoned judgment of the
practical value of things ordinarily go to make up the
mental equipment of the man who has made a million
dollars…
– Frank A. Vanderlip, Business and Education (1907)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agreement Between the Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts and the American Federation of Teachers Local 1895, AFL-CIO Faculty Federation and the University of Massachusetts, Effective July 1, 2014.
Barrow, Clyde W. 2010. The Rationality Crisis in U.S. Higher Education. New Political Science 32 (3) (September 2010): 317–344.
Bird, B.J. and D. N. Allen. 1989. Faculty Entrepreneurship in Research University Environments. Journal of Higher Education 60 (5): 583–596.
de Man, Henrik. 1928. The Psychology of Marxian Socialism, trans. Eden and Cedar Paul. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Dupree, A.Hunter. 1957. Science in the Federal Government: A History of Policies and Activities to 1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lenin, V.I. 1974. State and Revolution. New York: International Publishers.
MacCordy, E.L. 1992. Managing Technology Transfer. In Productivity and Higher Education, ed. Richard E. Anderson and Joel W. Meyerson. Princeton: Peterson’s Guides Inc.
Marx, Karl. 1973. Critique of the Gotha Program. New York: International Publishers.
Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
Ollman, Bertell. 1983. Class Struggle is the Name of the Game: True Confessions of a Marxist Businessman. New York: William Morrow.
Parker, L. 1993. Industry-University Research Collaboration: An Option for Generating Revenue. In The Funding of Higher Education: International Perspectives, ed. P.G. Altbach and D.B. Johnstone. New York: Garland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrow, C.W. (2018). The Two Cultures Problem. In: The Entrepreneurial Intellectual in the Corporate University. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63052-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63052-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63051-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63052-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)