Skip to main content

Process, Cause, and Emergence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Anticipation Science ((ANTISC,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter introduces the categories of causation and process – which together with whole and time constitute the fragment of general ontology that I can presently consider. On their basis, the theory of levels of reality, the categorical scaffolding of emergence, is sketched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Already at the dawn of the twentieth century, Brentano thoroughly discussed impersonals – at that time analyzed in detail from a linguistic point of view by Miklosic  – and developed a metaphysics of substance , as well as a logic, a mereology, and a general psychology based on the category of substance and able to include the situations linguistically represented by impersonals (Albertazzi, 2006; Poli, 1998, 2004) . A second example is provided by the ontology of Nicolai Hartmann , which includes both the category of process and the category of substance , although they are presented according to an order of relevance that is opposite to the traditional one. For Hartmann the category of process is one of the central categories of the sphere of real being – together with time and causation  – while the category of substance plays a secondary role limited to the level of physical and biological entities (Poli, 2012). These two exemplifications show that the categories of substance and process are far from being contradictory and, if suitably characterized, may coexist within the same ontological framework.

References

  • Albertazzi, L. (2006). Immanent realism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N. O., & Christiansen, P. V. (2000). Downward causation. Minds, bodies and matter. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S., Bhaskar, R., Colloier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (1998). Critical realism. Essential readings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1969). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1988). The possibility of naturalism (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, R. (2005). The myth of religious neutrality. An essay on the hidden role of religious belief in theories (2nd revised ed.). Notre Dame, France: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H. (1953). A new critique of theoretical thought (Vol. 4 Vols). Philadelphia: The Presbiterian and Reformed Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M., & Schuster, P. (1979). The hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, D. (2012). Top down causation and social structures. Interface Focus, 2, 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T., & Moran, P. (2000). Moving beyond metaphor: Towards a methodology for grounding complexity in small business and entrepreneurship research Emergence. A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2(1), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T., & Moran, P. (2001). Small enterprises as complex adaptive systems: A methodological question? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N. (1912). Philosophische Grundfragen der Biologie. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N. (1950). Philosophie der Natur. Abriss der speziellen Kategorienlehre. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N. (1951). Teleologisches Denken. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CL: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patomaki, H. (2011). On the complexities of time and temporality: Implications for world history and global futures. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 57(3), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (1998). La teoria del giudizio di Franz Brentano e Anton Marty: Giudizi tetici e giudizi doppi. Epistemologia, 21, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2001). The basic problem of the theory of levels of reality. Axiomathes, 12(3/4), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2004). Approaching Brentano’s theory of categories. In A. Chrudzimski & W. Huemer (Eds.), Phenomenology and analysis. Essays in Central European philosophy (pp. 285–321). Frankfurt, Germany: Ontos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2006a). First steps in experimental phenomenology. In A. Loula, R. Gudwin, & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Artificial cognition systems (pp. 358–386). Hersey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2006b). Levels of reality and the psychological stratum. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 61(2), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2007). Three obstructions: Forms of causation, Chronotopoids, and levels of reality. Axiomathes, 17(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10516-007-9007-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2010). The complexity of self-reference. A critical evaluation of Luhmann's theory of social systems. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 8(1–2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2011). Steps toward an explicit ontology of the future. Journal of Futures Studies, 16(1), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2012). Nicolai Hartmann. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (2000). Process philosophy: A survey of basic issues. Pittsburgh, PL: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. (1977). A system analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(4), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R. (1979). Order in living organisms: Systems-conditions of evolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1985). On social-biological homologies. Paper presented at the IIASA, Laxenburg/Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayrynen, K. (2015). Nicolai Hartmann’s concept of causality. In K. R. Peterson & R. Poli (Eds.), New research on the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann (pp. 45–64). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. A. (1969). The living system: Determinism stratified. Studium Generale, 22, 361–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylstra, U. (1992). Living things as hierarchically organized structures. Synthese, 91(1-2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poli, R. (2017). Process, Cause, and Emergence. In: Introduction to Anticipation Studies. Anticipation Science, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63023-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics