Abstract
I am aware that many colleagues do cycloplegic refractions on all children, but in adults they only perform dry (manifest) refractions. There are several reasons for this. In patients with early nuclear sclerosis, dilation may compromise visual acuity testing. Also, in hyperopic patients it can be hard to predict how much latent hyperopia is present, and how much of the plus they will tolerate. But I find that many adult patients with strabismus (usually esotropes but not exclusively so) do “funny” things with respect to accommodation; they may not relax it during a dry refraction in the same way as non-strabismic patients do. I recall one patient who was referred to me for strabismus surgery in her late 40s. She had a history of accommodative esotropia (ET) that had been controlled for many years, but over the prior 10 years her eye began to increasingly cross. She had undergone five refractions over the prior 10 years, having seen five different comprehensive ophthalmologists, all of whom performed dry refractions; they did dilate her for fundoscopy. Although my dry refraction was close to what she was currently wearing in her spectacles, my cycloplegic refraction revealed three additional diopters of hyperopia. She was incrementally given more hyperopic correction which eliminated her ET and brought great relief from the asthenopia she was experiencing with visual tasks.
The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.
—George Bernard Shaw
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Kushner BJ. Grating acuity tests should not be used for social service purposes in preliterate children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1030–1.
Kushner B, Lucchese N, Morton G. Grating visual acuity with teller cards compared with Snellen visual acuity in literate patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:485–93.
Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Measurement of strabismus in shortened exam lanes versus the 20-foot lane. Ann Ophthalmol. 1982;14:86–9.
Stager D, Everett ME. Comparison of strabismus measurements in mirrored and twenty foot lanes. Am Orthopt J. 1987;37:74–6.
Choi R, Kushner B. The accuracy of experienced strabismologists using the Hirschberg and Krimsky tests. Ophthalmology. 1998;116:108–12.
Cestari DM, Hunter DG, editors. Appendix 4. Addition of two prisms with one placed over each eye. In: Learning strabismus surgery: a case-based approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 234.
Morton GV, Kushner BJ. The use of diagnostic occlusion in strabismus management. J Ocul Ther Surg. 1983;2:194–200.
Guyton DL, O’Connor GM. Dynamic retinoscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1991;2:78–80.
Hunter DG. Dynamic retinoscopy: the missing data. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;46:269–74.
Simons K, Arnoldi K, Brown MH. Color dissociation artifacts in double Maddox rod cyclodeviation testing. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1897–901.
Kushner BJ, Haraharan L. Observations about objective and subjective ocular torsion. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2001–10.
Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Postoperative binocularity in adults with longstanding strabismus. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:316–9.
Kushner BJ. Unexpected cyclotropia simulating disruption of fusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1415–8.
Benegas NM, Egbert J, Engel WK, Kushner BJ. Diplopia secondary to aniseikonia associated with macular disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:896–9.
Kushner BJ. Intractable diplopia after strabismus surgery in adults. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1498–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kushner, B.J. (2017). The Examination. In: Strabismus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63019-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63019-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63018-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63019-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)