Skip to main content

The Person as Actor, the Actor as Person: Personality from a Dramaturgical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deep Drama
  • 539 Accesses

Abstract

The study of personality has long comprised of the major subfields of psychology. Phrenology provided an early means of assessing the distinctive personalities of people, and it enjoyed some dramatic appeal. Now, the technical capacity to examine brain structure and function by means of fMRI has a similar appeal, with a firmer scientific foundation. The assessment of human personality can be seen as portraiture, as a means of fitting people to the requirements of their roles, as a way of diagnosing psychopathology, or as a technique for describing the essential dimensions of human life. This chapter is a critical examination of this enterprise in terms of dramatic devices, including deception.

All the world is not, of course, a stage, but the crucial ways in which it isn’t are not easy to specify.

–Erving Goffman (1959, p. 72)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This point of view is developed fully in The Drama of Everyday Life (Scheibe, 2000).

  2. 2.

    See Allport’s (1955) Becoming.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, Freeman (1993), Mishler (1999), Gergen (1999), Pillemer (1998), Singer and Salovey (1993), and Wood and Kroger (2000) as well as Scheibe and Barrett (2017).

  4. 4.

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagery.

  5. 5.

    See Cochran (1986).

  6. 6.

    See the discussion in Gould (1981, chap. 5).

  7. 7.

    See Hogan (2002).

  8. 8.

    “There are thousands of personality measures in the published literature, and an overwhelming number of them are designed to assess elements of psychopathology” (Hogan 2002, p. 6).

  9. 9.

    The classic reference for self-presentation is Goffman (1959). See Kleinmutz (1967) for a discussion of response sets (reference on impression management as well—Tedeschi, Schlenker).

  10. 10.

    Quotes are from the MBTI manual (Myers & McCaulley, 1985).

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, P. (1968). The empty space. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, L. (1986). Portrait & story. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1993). Rewriting the self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1980). Social being: A theory for social psychology. Tatawa, NS: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (2002). Personality and the laws of history. Keynote address. 11th Annual European Conference on Personality, Jena, Germany, July 23, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmutz, B. (1967). Personality measurement. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, R. O. (1967). The effects of role demands and test-cue properties upon personality test performance. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 304–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1993). Stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1999). Storylines. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSS Assessment Staff. (1948). Assessment of men. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. M. (2004). The cult of personality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, D. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1986). Narrative psychology. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, K. E. (1978). The psychologist’s advantage and its nullification. American Psycologist, 33, 869–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, K. E. (2000). The drama of everyday life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, K. E., & Barrett, F. J. (2017). The storied nature of human life: The life and work of Theodore R. Sarbin. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1993). The remembered self. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1952). Lives in progress. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheibe, K.E. (2017). The Person as Actor, the Actor as Person: Personality from a Dramaturgical Perspective. In: Deep Drama. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62986-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics