Skip to main content

Exploring Aspects of Creativity in Mathematical Modelling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Modelling and Applications

Abstract

The demands of the twenty-first century require a new focus on identification and nurturing of mathematical creativity, an important key to personal and global success. This chapter reports on an investigation of student teachers’ notions of creativity and how creativity can be fostered in school students, as well as an analysis of the creativity evident in their group solutions to a mathematical modelling problem. A questionnaire, a mathematical modelling problem and interviews were used to generate data analysed qualitatively. The findings show participants’ intuitive conceptions of creativity are in line with the main aspects of creativity discussed in the literature – fluency, flexibility, novelty and usefulness – and that creativity in the solving of the modelling task was influenced by suitability of the task for the specific cohort.

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_53

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, M. (2014). The “Kidumatica” project – For the promotion of talented students from underprivileged backgrounds. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1403–1411. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biembengut, M., & Vieira, E. (2013). Mathematical modelling in teacher education courses: Style of thought in the international community – ICTMA. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. Mariot (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME-8) (pp. 980–989). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghes, D. (2015). Mathematical modelling: Its role to enhance mathematical pedagogy? Plenary lecture presented at 17th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications (ICTMA-17). Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Mathematical modelling skills and creative thinking skills. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 457–466). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 90–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterly, J. (2010). An exploratory study of the use of a problem-posing approach on pre-service elementary education teachers’ mathematical creativity, beliefs, and anxiety. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). Seoul: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Amit, M., & Schorr, Y. (1997). Using ‘real-life’ problems to prompt students to construct conceptual models for statistical reasoning. In I. Gal & J. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 65–83). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuel, D. (2009). Does technology help building more creative mathematical environments? In B. Sriraman, V. Freiman, & N. Lirette-Pitre (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, creativity and learning (pp. 233–247). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, D. (2003). No child left behind: A foolish race into the past. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 229–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko, & J. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity and giftedness. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (1999). Time. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, J. (2000). Creating and developing promising young mathematicians. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(7), 416–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (2000). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, H. (2011). Using a modelling task to elicit reasoning about data. In A. Rogerson & L. Paditz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the mathematics education into the 21st century project. Grahamstown: Rhodes University. Available from http://directorymathsed.net/download/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, H. (2014). Levels of mathematical creativity in model-eliciting activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(9), 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P., & Chiou, W. (2008). Postformal thinking and creativity among late adolescents: A post-Piagetian approach. Adolescence, 43(170), 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena M. Wessels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Model-Eliciting Task: Making Money

Appendix: Model-Eliciting Task: Making Money

During the last summer holidays, Maya started a concession business at Wild Days Amusement Park. Her vendors carried popcorn and drinks around the park, selling wherever they can find customers. Maya needs help deciding which workers to rehire next summer.

Last year Maya had nine vendors. This summer, she can have only six – three full time and three part time. She wants to rehire the vendors who will make the most money for her, but she does not know how to compare them because they worked different numbers of hours. Also, when they worked makes a big difference. After all, it is easier to sell more on a crowded Friday night than a on a rainy afternoon.

Maya reviewed her records from last year. For each vendor, she totalled the number of hours worked and the money collected – when business in the park was busy (high attendance), steady and slow (low attendance) (see table). Please evaluate how well the different vendors did last year for the business and which three should she rehire full time and which three she should rehire part time.

Write a letter to Maya giving your results. In your letter, describe how you evaluated the vendors. Give details so Maya can check your work, and give a clear explanation so she can decide whether your method is a good one for her to use.

figure a

(Source: Lesh et al. 1997, p. 67)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wessels, H.M. (2017). Exploring Aspects of Creativity in Mathematical Modelling. In: Stillman, G., Blum, W., Kaiser, G. (eds) Mathematical Modelling and Applications. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62967-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62968-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics