Skip to main content

Students’ Overreliance on Linearity in Economic Applications: A State of the Art

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2132 Accesses

Abstract

Students’ overreliance on linear models is well-known and has been investigated empirically in a variety of mathematical subdomains, at distinct educational levels and in different countries. We present a state of the art of students’ overreliance on linearity in economic applications. We illustrate the widespread but sometimes debatable use of linearity in economics, discussing the treatment of demand and supply functions and of the Phillips curve in major economic textbooks. Next, we provide an overview of instances of, and comments on, this phenomenon in the economic education research literature. Typically, the phenomenon is described in the margin of economic studies whose primary focus is elsewhere. Finally, a study having students’ overreliance on linearity as its main research focus is discussed in some detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Besanko, D., & Braeutigam, R. R. (2011). Microeconomics. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (2006). Macroeconomics. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christandl, F., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2009). How laypeople and experts misperceive the effect of economic growth. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christandl, F., & Gärling, T. (2011). The accuracy of consumers’ perception of future inflationary price changes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(4), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., & Janssens, D. (1998). The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students’ solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bock, D., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Students’ overuse of linearity: An exploration in physics. Research in Science Education, 41, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bock, D., Van Reeth, D., Minne, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2014). Students’ overreliance on linearity in economic thinking: An exploratory study at the tertiary level. International Review of Economics Education, 16, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Borger, B., & Van Poeck, A. (2009). Economie in rechte lijn [Economics in a straight line]. Antwerpen: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debelle, G., & Vickery, J. (1998). Is the Phillips curve a curve? Some evidence and implications for Australia. The Economist Society of Australia, 74(227), 384–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decoster, A. (2010). Economie [Economics]. Leuven: Leuven Universitaire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, E. (1986). A note on the use (and misuse) of log-linear approximations in economics. The American Economist, 30(1), 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., Fang, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Medium maximization. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. G., & O’Brien, A. P. (2006). Microeconomics. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huylebrouck, D. (2005). Bang van Filip [Afraid of Filip]. De Standaard, June 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice (Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, 2002). Retrieved on 04.10.15 from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf

  • Lipsey, R. G., & Chrystal, K. A. (2007). Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G., & Taylor, P. (2014). Economics. Andover: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, M. (2010). Microeconomics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, C. (2008). Equilibrium illusion, economic complexity and evolutionary foundation in economic analysis. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 5(1), 81–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Png, I., & Lehman, D. (2007). Managerial economics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, J., & Garratt, D. (2010). Essentials of economics. London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2009). Exponential growth bias and household finance. The Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2807–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, W., & Greer, B. (Eds.). (2010). Special issue: Dominance of linearity in mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(1), 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Depaepe, F., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). The illusion of linearity: Expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daam Van Reeth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Reeth, D., De Bock, D. (2017). Students’ Overreliance on Linearity in Economic Applications: A State of the Art. In: Stillman, G., Blum, W., Kaiser, G. (eds) Mathematical Modelling and Applications. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62967-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62968-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics