Skip to main content

Comparison of Auction Methods for Job Scheduling with Absolute Priorities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Computing Technologies (PaCT 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10421))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The model of geographically distributed computing system with absolute priorities of jobs is described in the paper. Authors designed the decentralized scheduling algorithm using the auction methods. Two auction methods were researched and compared: the first-price sealed-bid auction and the English auction. The paper includes results of experimental comparison of researched auction methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foster, I.: The physiology of the grid: an open grid services architecture for distributed systems integration. Comput. Netw. Int. J. Comput. Telecommun. Netw. 40(1), 5–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kovalenko, V.N., Koryagin, D.A.: Organization of Grid resources Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics RAS, no. 63, p. 25 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khoroshevskii, V.G.: Virtualization architecture of distributed computing systems in Student, Scientist, Teacher. p. 69. Avtograf, Novosibirsk (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Korneev, V.V., Monakhov, O.G.: About allocation of tasks in computer systems with programmable structure in Architecture of computer systems with programmable structure, pp. 3–17. Sobolev Institute of mathematics, Novosibirsk (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamscher, V., Schwiegelshohn, U., Streit, A., Yahyapour, R.: Evaluation of job-scheduling strategies for grid computing. In: Buyya, R., Baker, M. (eds.) GRID 2000. LNCS, vol. 1971, pp. 191–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi:10.1007/3-540-44444-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kovalenko, V.N., Kovalenko, E.I., Shorin, O.N.: Development of grid job dispatcher based on lookahead scheduling. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics RAS, Moscow (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bobchenkov, A.V.: Development of models and management practices in virtual organizations distributed computing systems (in Russian). MPEI, Moscow (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buyya, R., Abramson, D., Giddy, J., Stockinger, H.: Economic models for resource allocation and scheduling in grid computing. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Exp. 14, 1507–1542 (2002). doi:10.1002/cpe.690

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nabrzyski, J., Schopf, J.M., Weglarz, J.: Grid Resource Management. State of the Art and Future Trends (2003). doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0509-9

  10. Wolski, R., Plank, J.S., Bryan, T., Brevik, J.: G-commerce: market formulations controlling resource allocation on the computational grid. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, April 2000. doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2001.924985

  11. Vazhkudai, S., von Laszewski, G.: A greedy grid - the grid economic engine directive. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, April 2000. doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2001.925170

  12. Chen, C., Maheswaran, M., Toulouse, M.: Supporting coallocation in an auctioning-based resource allocator for grid systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, April 2001. doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2002.1015666

  13. Hurwicz, L.: The design of resource allocation mechanisms. In: Arrow, K., Hurwicz, L. (eds.) Studies in Resource Allocation Processes, pp. 3–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752940.002

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomoluch, J., Schroeder, M.: Market-based resource allocation for grid computing: a model and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, pp. 211–218, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grosu, D., Das, A.: Auction-based resource allocation protocols in grids. In: Proceedings of the 16th IASTED International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, pp. 20–27 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolski, R., Plank, J.S., Brevik, J., Bryan, T.: Analyzing market-based resource allocation strategies for the computational grid. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 15(3), 258–281 (2001). doi:10.1177/109434200101500305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vohra, R.V.: Combinatorial auctions. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 4, pp. 455–476 (2015). doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53766-9.00008-2

  18. Kale, L.V., Kumar, S., Potnuru, M., DeSouza, J., Bandhakavi, S.: Faucets: efficient resource allocation on the computational grid. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP 2004), pp. 396–405 (2004). doi:10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327948

  19. Baranov, A.V., Tikhomirov, A.I.: Use closed bid auction in a territorially distributed computing system with absolute priorities. In: Proceedings of the NSCF 2016, Pereslavl-Zalessky (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Toporkov, V.V., Emelyanov, D.M., Potehin, P.A.: Job batch generation and scheduling in distributed computing environments. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Computational Mathematics and Software Engineering, no 2. pp. 21–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Baranov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baranov, A., Telegin, P., Tikhomirov, A. (2017). Comparison of Auction Methods for Job Scheduling with Absolute Priorities. In: Malyshkin, V. (eds) Parallel Computing Technologies. PaCT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62932-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62932-2_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62931-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62932-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics