Skip to main content

History and Development of Breast Implants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

Abstract

The first breast implants were created by Cronin [1] in 1962, and after that there was a big evolution in them. The initial concern was to find a biocompatible sort of material: properly tolerated by the body and also inert. In 1958, Scales [2] proposed a review of the criteria needed for implant considering biocompatibility:

  • No chemical activity

  • No physical transformations when in contact with the body

  • No stimulus to inflammatory reactions or foreign material

  • Not being carcinogenic

  • Able to stand mechanical forces

  • Easy to produce at considerable low cost

  • Able to be sterilized

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1963) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scales JT (2004) Biological and mechanical factors in prosthetic surgery. In: Gilles L (ed) Modern trends in surgical material. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnard JJ, Todd EL, Wilson WG, Mielcarek R, Rohrich RJ (1997) Distribution of organosilicon polymers in augmentation mammaplasties at autopsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaubitz M, Jackisch C, Domschke W, Heindel W, Pfleiderer B (2002) Silicone breast implants: correlation between implants ruptures, magnetic resonance spectroscopically estimated silicone presence in the liver, antibody status and clinical symptoms. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kessler DA (1992) The basis of FDA’s decision on breast implants. N Engl J Med 326:1713–1715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan SC, Birdsell DC, Gradeen CY (1991) Urinary excretion of free toluenediamines in a patient with polyurethane-covered breast implants. Clin Chem 37:2143–2145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E (2001) Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: a prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2108–2112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soubirac L, Jougla E, Hezard L, Grolleu JL, Chavoin JP (2002) Deflation of breast implants, pre-filled with saline or hydrogel. Results and analysis of 650 treated patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 47:273–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Little JW, Golembe EV, Fisher JB (1981) The “living bra” in immediate and delayed reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy for malignant and nonmalignant disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heneghan C (2012) The saga of Poly Implant Prosthèse breast implants. BMJ 344:e306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smahel J (1978) Tissue reactions to breast implant coated with polyurethane. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benoit FM (1993) Degradrations of polyurethane foams used in Meme breast implants. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K (2004) Which is the best position for the remote injection dome using the adjustable expander/prosthesis in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:877–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sergotti TJ, Limoli JP, Baldwin CM Jr, Laub DR (1986) Human adjuvant disease, possible autoimmune disease after silicone implantation: a review of the literature, case studies and speculation for the future. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferguson JH (1997) Silicone breast implants and neurologic disorders. Neurology 48:1504–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hochberg MC (1996) Lack of association between augmentation mammaplasty and systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 39:1125–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friis S, Mellemkjaer L, McLaughlin JK et al (1997) Connective tissue disease and other rheumatic conditions following breast implants in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg 39:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanchez-Guerrero J (1995) Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective tissue disease and symptoms. N Engl J Med 332:1667–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherine G, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT et al (1994) Risk of connective tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 330:1697–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller AS, Willard V, Kline K et al (1998) Absence of longitudinal changes in rheumatological parameters after silicone breast implantation: a prospective 13 year study. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2299–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nyren O, Yin L, Josefsson S et al (1998) Risk of connective tissue disease and related disorders among women with breast implants: a nation-wide retrospective cohort study in Sweden. Br Med J 316:417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petit JY, Le MG, Mouriesse H, Rietjens M, Gill P, Contesso G, Lehmann A (1994) Can breast reconstruction with gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of death and second primary cancer in patients treated by mastectomy for breast cancer? Plast Reconstr Surg 94:115–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Petit JY, Le MG, Rietjens M, Contesso G, Lehmann A, Mouriesse H (1998) Does long-term exposure to gel-filled silicone implants increase the risk of relapse after breast cancer? Tumori 84:525–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkins H (1992) Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer? N Engl J Med 326:1649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Deapen DM, Pike MC, Casagrande JT et al (1986) The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Deapen DM, Brody GS (1992) Augmentation mammaplasty and breast cancer: a 5-years update of the Los Angeles Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marotta JS, Goldberg EP, Habal MB, Amery DP, Martin PJ, Urbaniak DJ, Widenhouse CW (2002) Silicone gel breast implant failure: evaluation of properties of shells and gels for explanted prostheses and meta-analysis of literature rupture data. Ann Plast Surg 49:227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ikeda DM, Borofsky HB, Herfkens RJ, Sawyer-glover AM, Birdwell RL, Glover GH (1999) Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography and ultrasounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfleiderer B, Campbell T, Hulka CA et al (1996) Silicone gel-filled breast implants in women: findings at H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology 201:777–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gaubitz M, Jackisch C, Domschke W, Heindel W, Pfleiderer B (2002) Silicone breast implants: correlation between implant ruptures, magnetic resonance spectroscopically estimated silicone presence in the liver, antibody status and clinical symptoms. Rheumatology 41:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spear SL, Baker JL Jr (1995) Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1119–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Loch-Wilkinson A, Beath KJ, Knight RJW et al (2017) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand: high-surface-area textured implants are associated with increased risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):645–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. De Boer M, van Leeuwen FE, Hauptmann M et al (2018) Breast implants and the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in the breast. JAMA Oncol 4(3):335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Clemens MW, Medeiros LJ, Butler CE et al (2016) Complete surgical excision is essential for the management of patients with breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 34(2):160–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rietjens, M., da Costa Vieira, M.A., Urban, C., Lohsiriwat, V. (2019). History and Development of Breast Implants. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M., El-Tamer, M., Sacchini, V.S. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62927-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics