Skip to main content

Aesthetic Principles for Breast Reconstruction: Breast Aesthetic Units and Evaluation of Late Aesthetic Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

Abstract

Aesthetics (aisthésis) is a branch of philosophy dealing with the study of nature and beauty. Several philosophers have encountered great difficulty when attempting to define beauty, or even ugliness, and even more when attempting to quantify this property. Kant, a respected philosopher whose aesthetic notions were quoted by his peers, asserted that it was impossible to establish theoretical rules to build beautiful things.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pussic AL (2012) The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):293–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg S1748–6815(16):30120–30126

    Google Scholar 

  3. Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, MAtros E, Disa J, Mehara B, Pusic AL (2016) Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):758–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:455–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson DA (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burget GG, Menick FJ (1985) Subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spear SL (2009) Oncoplastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):993–994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joyce CW, Murphy S, Kelly JL, Morrison CM (2015) Scar wars: preferences in breast surgery. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Restifo RJ (1999) The aesthetic subunit principle in late TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 43(3):235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coutinho M, Southern S, Ramakrishnan V et al (2001) The aesthetic implications of scar position in breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 54(5):326–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Song AY, Fernstrom MH, Scott JA, Ren DX, Rubin JP, Shestak KC (2006) Assessment of TRAM aesthetics: the importance of subunit integration. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(1):15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Falanga V, Zitelli J, Eaglestein W (1998) Wound healing. J Am Acad Dermatol 19(3):559–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spear SL, Davison SP (2003) Aesthetic subunits of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):440–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenqvist S, Sandelin K, Wickman M (1996) Patients psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 22:262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, Virani S, Narod S, Pal T (2015) Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3324–3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkins E, Cederna P, Lowery J et al (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabino J, Lucas DJ, Shriver CD, Vertrees AE, Valerio IL, Singh DP (2016) NSQIP analysis: increased immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Am Surg 82(6):540–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sampaio, M.M.C., Fraga, M. (2019). Aesthetic Principles for Breast Reconstruction: Breast Aesthetic Units and Evaluation of Late Aesthetic Results. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M., El-Tamer, M., Sacchini, V.S. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62927-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics